« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

What Gov. Palin Needs To Say Tonight

Limited Objectives

Tonight’s speech at the Republican National Convention by vice presidential nominee Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin is probably the most important convention speech in memory by a vice presidential candidate. Gov. Palin made a smashingly good impression with her initial appearance on Friday, but her relative inexperience combined with a ferocious left-wing/media assault on her and her family has left a lot of the public up in the air as to what to make of her. Obviously, she’s enormously popular with Republican activists and hated by the cultural Left, and there is copious evidence that people in general and women in particular are upset at how she has been treated over the past several days (note: when Obama and his allies are turning off the likes of Lindsay Lohan, they are really playing with fire), but sympathy is one thing, and respect is entirely another. Tonight’s audience will be looking to Gov. Palin to show them why they should respect her.

With that in mind, a few thoughts about what tonight’s speech should look like. Gov. Palin has a lot of work to do to close the sale with voters who only first met her five days ago, whether they like her or not, and it’s not going to happen all in one speech. It’s important for a speech not to try to do too many things, lest it fail to accomplish any of them. For example, Barack Obama’s race speech back in the spring was a smashing success, at least temporarily, because it had just two goals: redirect attention away from Rev. Wright, and let Obama speak movingly about a subject he cares deeply about. By contrast, Obama’s convention speech really was not that impressive – Obama was trying to give out some of his patented rhetoric without looking too grandiose, he was trying to reassure people on national security, taxes and social issues, he was trying to prove he could get specific, he was trying to mend fences with Hillaryites…too many goals for one speech. Gov. Palin needs to focus on a few achievable goals.

1. Go light on the ‘girl power’ stuff. The key sound bites from her Friday speech, which most people who would be watching tonight have already seen on the news, were about the historic nature of her candidacy as a woman. That doesn’t need to be repeated at any length. Palin’s mere presence is enough to remind people of that history.

2. Go light on the mooses. It’s hard for any politician to establish a clear identity with the public, let alone in less than a week, but the media blitz around Palin has already hammered home the basic nutshell: mother of five, small town girl, “hockey mom,” pro-life and really means it, pro-gun, shoots moose. That’s actually quite a lot of brand identity already built in, and some of it can be reinforced by her introduction. Gov. Palin doesn’t need to sell people on why they should like a woman with that background (many will, some won’t); she needs to sell them on why they should believe that a likeable, relatable woman is also ready to be the Vice President and, if necessary, the Commander-in-Chief.

3. Guns and abortion are Obama’s problem. Relatedly, Palin’s “pro-life, pro-gun” credibility is not going to be questioned – she needs to expand that issue profile beyond social issues, not worry about proving her bona fides. If she does get into issues like abortion and guns, it should only be to attack Obama’s extremism on those issues. (I had assumed before the Palin nomination and the hurricane-shortened convention that Mike Huckabee would give the speech that tears into Obama’s positions on those issues, but it is unclear now if Huck will even get his speech shown by the cable networks).

4. Stick to the broad themes on foreign policy. Gov. Palin won’t prove herself an expert on national security in one prepared speech and shouldn’t try. Leave the thorny issues like South Ossetia, Waziristan, Iran’s nuclear program and the future of the Atlantic alliance to McCain, who has built decades of credibility on them. Gov. Palin can start the process of reassuring Republicans on her national security credibility by hitting a few marks on the most familiar questions – 9/11, terrorism, Iraq, Afghanistan – and leave for later the process of fleshing out her views.

5. Sell her record as Governor. Traditionally, Governors, whatever their foreign policy experience or lack thereof, have sold themselves to the public as serious people by running on their record of accomplishment and showing how they have grappled with the issues that have come accross their desks. In Gov. Palin’s case that means a heavy focus on energy policy, on which she is legitimately an expert from her time both as Governor and on the Oil and Gas Commission, and on battling corruption and wasteful spending. The Washington Post notes that “Palin is likely to emphasize her areas of policy expertise — particularly energy and political reform — rather than focusing on her biography or gender,” and that’s what it needs to be about. If Palin can convince voters that she is 100% ready on day one to deal with pocketbook issues, she is halfway home.

6. Show some steel. A convention speech is not the time or place to waste time rebutting the other side’s attacks, whether personal or poilitical. Gov. Palin can probably best deal with the personal stuff by sitting down with someone like Barbara Walters or even Oprah (anybody appropriate to the task is in the tank for Obama, so why not someone who is open about it?). But the message does need to be sent in more general terms that she is accustomed to the brickbats that come with standing up to the establishment, that she can – in Harry Truman’s words – take the heat in the kitchen, and that no matter what gets thrown at her, she won’t back off or back down and will keep doing the people’s business. Plus, a few well-timed Churchillian lines of that nature, ideally as the conclusion of the speech, will absolutely bring down the house in a convention packed with delegates who are just dying to put on a rousing show of support for a woman most Republicans feel is being unfairly slimed by a media that’s been all too reluctant to do the same thing to the other side’s presidential nominee.

That is her mission tonight.

COMMENTS

  • entropy

    i agree with basically everything on this post. she needs to be light on her gender and alaska background and focus more on her record fighting against corruption and her extensive knowledge of energy.

    having said that, i’m really concerned that this convention might turn into a replay of the democratic convention in 2004, where they focused extensively on kerry’s war record and personal history. we should be aggressively hitting hard on obama’s ultraliberal policies and values and showing how a president obama and a democratic congress will hurt this country. the convention needs to simultaneously make the case for McCain and the case against Obama.

  • brownierulze

    She shouldn’t talk about her efforts to ban library books. She probably shouldn’t assert that she’s familiar with foreign affairs because Alaska is so close to Russia, nor should she talk about the benefits of abstinence only sex education.

    I wouldn’t brag about her executive experience either :-) Nor would I mention anything about the campaign canceling interviews with such attack dogs as Larry King :-)

    I don’t think she should talk about how she would handle the presidency, if, god forbid, the 4 time cancer survivor and 72 year old McCain were to die, say, in January. That might scare the citizenry a wee bit :-)

  • brownierulze

    I wouldn’t mention her attendance last week at her church when the founder of Jews for Jesus spoke :-)

    • entropy

      the democrats’ attack on palin’s “inexperience” is hilarious and comforting! you guys just nominated the most liberal and inexperienced PRESIDENTIAL candidate in modern American history, who has a long history of forming friendships with racists and terrorists like wright and ayers.

      • TomOConnor

        Talk about her Pastor?
        Her real estate dealings?
        Her Senate committees that have never convened.

        • cnd46

          You liberals need a wake-up call. Why are y’all all so upset with this, your Presidential nominee has no executive experience. Just go away.

  • ZootSuit

    I agree with everything you write but what really steps out in my mind is the idea of Palin on Oprah to address the “personal” questions.

    Although Oprah is understandably in the bag for Obama, her own demographics would dictate that she cannot go too “negative” on Palin for having a pregnant teenage daughter. Being only slightly snarky but I would guess “mother’s of pregnant teenage daughters” is probably 60% of Oprah’s audience and the topic of 50% of her shows. Whatever else, it would give Palin (and the McCain campaign) the opportunity to directly address that demographic.

    And if Oprah did become aggressively negative against Palin, it would be chalked up to Oprah’s pro-Obama bias.

    My only concerns are:

    1) By going on Oprah, it does make Palin to be more of the “woman candidate” instead of the Vice Presidential candidate. This concern can be ameliorated if Joe Biden was also invited on Oprah.

    And yeah, Joe Biden on Oprah is an obvious win for Sarah Palin in particular and the Republicans in general.

    2) Whatever else, don’t underestimate Oprah Winfrey’s intelligence. Although some of you may not like me asking this question but the question remains can Sarah Palin take care of Oprah?

    Indeed, after all is said and done, I think Palin would have an easier time against Biden than against Oprah Winfrey.

  • Rod_Patrick

    If it does, it will destroy him.

    Just a reminder.

    • BrianH

      Their founder has spoken at my church as well. I found the organization to be just what its name suggest. They are people of Jewish background who have come to realize that Jesus really was the messiah. They preach about Jesus from the point of view of Jewish history and teachings.

  • Catsy

    (note: when Obama and his allies are turning off the likes of Lindsay Lohan, they are really playing with fire)

    Obviously this was a throwaway side comment that was tangential to the post, but you may want to reconsider its inclusion and the assumptions behind it. John McCormack quoted one half of Lohan’s comments that does sound like an indictment of the media (less so of Obama), but omitted the rest of her post that paints a decidedly different picture. You can read the whole thing if you click through to the CNN ticker McCormack linked. Or better yet, go to the source itself:

    I’ve been watching the news all morning, like everyone else – and i keep hearing about the issues related to ‘teen pregnancy’- It’s all related to Sarah Palin and her 17 year old unmarried pregnant daughter. Well, I think the real problem comes from the fact that we are taking the focus off of getting to know Sarah Palin and her political views, and what she can do to make our country a less destructive place. Its distracting from the real issues, the real everyday problems that this country experiences.

    I am concerned with the fact that Sarah Palin brought the attention to her daughter’s pregnancy, rather than all world issues and what she believes she could possibly do to change them-if elected. I get Sarah Palin’s views against abortion, but i would much prefer to hear more about what she can do for our country rather than how her daughter is going to have a child no matter what.

    Maybe focus on delivering some words and policy with stronger impact like Joe Biden.

    Now, I don’t think anyone here–myself included–really cares what Lindsay Lohan has to say. She’s entitled to her opinions and her franchise like the rest of us, but her opinions should be evaluated on their merits, not her fame.

    But it’s simply not even close to accurate to imply, let alone state outright, that “Obama and his allies are turning off the likes of Lindsay Lohan” using that quote as the basis.

  • E_Pluribus_Unum

    I think you are absolutely on target.

  • TheSophist

    This is a great list. However, I think you left out something big.

    The reason why I, like many true liberals, are so excited by Gov. Palin is not that she’s a woman, but that she’s a true liberal. Because frankly John McCain is somewhat weaker on this issue, she needs to be strong on it.

    She needs to articulate with clarity the good old conservative message: Government is the problem, not the solution. The party of Ronald Reagan wins every time it articulates its true liberal message: belief in individual opportunity and responsibility, reducing the size and scope of government, and faith in human freedom as the ultimate force for improvement both here and abroad. There is no reason to shrink from it.

    Yes, she’s a reformer, and that is something she should hammer home. But she should make clear the conservative message of reform: that the nanny state is to be resisted and turned back. That power belongs to the people, not to bureaucrats. That the individual American knows what is best for her family than all the commissioners on a Washington DC blue ribbon panel. That the government has an important role to play in the economy, but it has long since overstepped those bounds — and reference ENERGY as the prime example of such overstepping. She is an acknowledged expert on energy economics; she can hit the Dems hard and fast on their refusal to open up domestic energy production, and be credible doing it. At the same time, she can articulate the conservative message.

    She has the bona fides to be convincing on this score — as a true outsider with a track record for taking on entrenched powers even in her own party, she can convince Americans that she and McCain can tear out the corruption from the beast that is the federal bureaucracy and all of its special interests.

    We need to hear that full-throated endorsement of individualism, freedom, and capitalism. McCain, for all his positives, is not the strongest spokesperson for that right now because of things like McCain-Feingold and his embracing of global warming racket. Without contradicting McCain directly on any of his policies, Gov. Palin has the opportunity to articulate with clarity and force the principles of conservatism to the American people.

    Finally, and this is less important, I think she should draw a specific contrast between her record as a reformer, as an outsider, to Biden’s record as the ultimate Washington insider. Let the Dems continually compare Obama to Palin. She ought to hammer them on their ill-fated selection of Biden. Whose ticket is the “Hope and Change” ticket again?

    -TS

  • Adam_C

    Agreed.

    • Taniwha

      As little experience as she has, it’s way more than their TOP of the ticket, and that’s just embarrassing. So they hope that, being a woman, maybe she can be spooked by the savageness of the attack. In less words, they can’t beat her, so they’re trying to psych her into going away. That might end up being a worse bet than just arguing that Obama’s campaign experience beats being a sitting governor. (yeah… that was a good one…) And never mind that it’s McCain that he has to beat, not his veep.

      • civil_truth

        A little google check shows that your threadjacking statement is straight from Daily Kos (or other lefty sites).

        I know you’re just parroting since you couldn’t be bothered to correct the author’s misidentification of the speaker’s relationship to Jews for Jesus.

        No I’m not going to do your homework for you.

        • civil_truth

          A little google check shows that your threadjacking statement is straight from Daily Kos (or other lefty sites).

          I know you’re just parroting since you couldn’t be bothered to correct the author’s misidentification of the speaker’s relationship to Jews for Jesus.

          No I’m not going to do your homework for you.

          • civil_truth

            I didn’t get a “message posted” notice, but rather an IE error message when I clicked to post my comoent. When I signed on RS again, I thought my comment had ended up in a cyber blackholed since it wasn’t listed and thus I posted again.

  • BeerCanDave

    I don’t think we need to care about the political opinions of a trollop who ingests mountains of coke and trolls for lesbian sex in clubs.

    • MattW

      If only we could count on McCain to actually deliver on the promise of smaller government.

      Charts like this are damning. Yes, Reagan had the Cold War to hold, and Clinton had an amazing, unfettered economic expansion to help drive down budget as a percentage of GDP. But the rebound under Bush is part and parcel of a “conservative” administration that passes trash like a “prescription drug benefit”.

      It’s basically too late; McCain is clearly another big-government conservative. I wish we could have seen Reagan in action in a decade during which he didn’t have the Cold War to fight.

      In any event, I’ll keep my fingers crossed that McCain/Palin will be conservative in office, but I have the feeling it will be more of the same.

  • Moriah

    As a woman, a liberal (as in, Democrat), and a Hillary supporter, I did not react very well to Sarah’s statement in her acceptance speech that as Vice-President she would be breaking the highest glass ceiling. Second-highest, maybe, but even if (God Forbid!) McCain were to die in office, becoming the first female president by succession is not the same as being elected the first female president.

    It is going to be hard enough for her to win over Hillary supporters, who generally have the same liberal values as Hillary, without seeming to suggest that being chosen as vice-president is the same as receiving 18 million votes for president.

    This is not to denigrate the historic nature of being the first woman ever on a Republican ticket. But it is not the same.

    That being said, I think many Democrats underestimate the fact that the pro-life message can resonate very strongly with women. While Hillary was the most successful female candidate for president, we can’t forget the achievements of women like Ellen Cullen McCormack — the first woman to ever raise enough money in the bid for the presidency to qualify for federal matching funds — who ran on a strict pro-life platform and were very successful. Not all women are pro-choice, and many women who are pro-choice would still not make that choice for themselves.

    Also, women who are pro-life are generally much more intense about their view than men who are pro-life — it’s women who give birth, it’s women who feel that life move inside of them, and it’s women who feel with acute sensitivity the fear that some woman might be pressured into having an abortion when it is not what they want. It’s also women who feel more guilt if they have had an abortion, and women who experience most directly the pain of miscarriage of a wanted baby. I’m not saying that men whose wives lose a child do not grieve, but women are much more likely to blame themselves if they have a miscarriage.

    I agree that a better forum to discuss her family’s decisions regarding life and choice would be a talk show — especially since the majority of daytime talk hosts’s audiences are women, particularly stay-at-home moms, who are generally more conservative. She can also discuss the issues of balancing a demanding career with having a family and being a good mother — and perhaps even change the mind of women who truly believe Dr. Laura’s meme that all women should say “I am my kids’ mom” before saying “I am “.

    I still don’t know if she will be successful in attracting disaffected Hillary supporters. But I think her appeal to women in general is underestimated.

    • Dan_McLaughlin

      of Obama’s base right there.

      • Moriah

        Let’s give this one more try….

        As a woman, a liberal (as in, Democrat), and a Hillary supporter, I did not react very well to Sarah’s statement in her acceptance speech that as Vice-President she would be breaking the highest glass ceiling. Second-highest, maybe, but even if (God Forbid!) McCain were to die in office, becoming the first female president by succession is not the same as being elected the first female president.

        It is going to be hard enough for her to win over Hillary supporters, who generally have the same liberal values as Hillary, without seeming to suggest that being chosen as vice-president is the same as receiving 18 million votes for president.

        This is not to denigrate the historic nature of being the first woman ever on a Republican ticket. But it is not the same.

        That being said, I think many Democrats underestimate the fact that the pro-life message can resonate very strongly with women. While Hillary was the most successful female candidate for president, we can’t forget the achievements of women like Ellen Cullen McCormack — the first woman to ever raise enough money in the bid for the presidency to qualify for federal matching funds — who ran on a strict pro-life platform and were very successful. Not all women are pro-choice, and many women who are pro-choice would still not make that choice for themselves.

        Also, women who are pro-life are generally much more intense about their view than men who are pro-life — it’s women who give birth, it’s women who feel that life move inside of them, and it’s women who feel with acute sensitivity the fear that some woman might be pressured into having an abortion when it is not what they want. It’s also women who feel more guilt if they have had an abortion, and women who experience most directly the pain of miscarriage of a wanted baby. I’m not saying that men whose wives lose a child do not grieve, but women are much more likely to blame themselves if they have a miscarriage.

        I agree that a better forum to discuss her family’s decisions regarding life and choice would be a talk show — especially since the majority of daytime talk hosts’s audiences are women, particularly stay-at-home moms, who are generally more conservative. She can also discuss the issues of balancing a demanding career with having a family and being a good mother — and perhaps even change the mind of women who truly believe Dr. Laura’s meme that all women should say “I am my kids’ mom” before saying “I am my career”.

        I still don’t know if she will be successful in attracting disaffected Hillary supporters. But I think her appeal to women in general is underestimated.

  • LAWizard

    Be Yourself.

    The whole unknown factor is one of the biggest issues sitting with Sarah Palin. You shouldn’t turn your life and family into a campaign issue, but you can’t deny who you are as a person.

    • Rod_Patrick

      is for brownierulze.

      Many excellent diaries in the last 3 days are being muddled by the trolls and mobies.

      This one of Dan is really very good.

  • bs

    as her finale statement:

    “TO those of you in the MSM who are in bed with The Obamessiah: BITE ME”

    That would be unique and appropriate.

    • ZootSuit

      In his over twenty years in the House and Senate, John McCain has not asked for any earmarks. Moreover, he was almost the lone voice against that “prescription drug benefit” boondoggle that we both condemn.

      Truth be known, despite all of his issues — and yes, they are many — John McCain is probably the strongest and most consistent Republican proponent of small government there is.

  • dp_jack

    Seriously, Sarah Palin is NOT turning her life and family into a campaign issue. You can thank the corrupted media for that, by taking issues way out of context and distorting them by citing accusations on false pretenses.

    NOTE – It’s really ashame that Sarah has more political experience than Osama err Obama for one and hey, what do you know, she can write her own speeches without stealing them from past presidents too!

  • han_solo

    Personally, I think she needs to come out swinging a 2X4 full of nails and talk about:

    1) Cocaine use by Obama

    2) His trips to the middle east when he was young on a Indonesian passport

    3) The fact he is an indonesian citizen and never requested to keep his american citizenship and might have actually lost it

    4) Why did he feel the need to change his name to Barak Hussin Obama from Barry Sowerto?

    5) What religion was he practicing before he converted to christian?

  • han_solo

    Personally, I think she needs to come out swinging a 2X4 full of nails and talk about:

    1) Cocaine use by Obama

    2) His trips to the middle east when he was young on a Indonesian passport

    3) The fact he is an indonesian citizen and never requested to keep his american citizenship and might have actually lost it

    4) Why did he feel the need to change his name to Barak Hussin Obama from Barry Sowerto?

    5) What religion was he practicing before he converted to christian?

    Basically any question/topic that the media is covering up for.

  • han_solo

    Personally, I think she needs to come out swinging a 2X4 full of nails and talk about:

    1) Cocaine use by Obama

    2) His trips to the middle east when he was young on a Indonesian passport

    3) The fact he is an indonesian citizen and never requested to keep his american citizenship and might have actually lost it

    4) Why did he feel the need to change his name to Barak Hussin Obama from Barry Sowerto?

    5) What religion was he practicing before he converted to christian?

    Basically any question/topic that the media is covering up for…any of those topics that they just brush over, ignore or don’t ever mention.

  • blossombear

    I think Palin simply needs to represent herself as someone who is not a token candidate. That is, she needs to show substance. She needs to show that she was not chosen because she?s a woman and as a last minute attempt to pander to disenfranchised Hillary voters and she needs to show that she?s not just the flavor of the month chosen to whip up a media frenzy. As long as she demonstrates that she?s qualified, not because she?s a woman, but because of substance we?ve seen in Obama that people are willing to overlook experience if they see something worth following. I still think though that McCain has now set himself up for some difficult gymnastics because he?s the one who needs to impress, she just needs to show she?s competent. If she wows everyone and then McCain comes out with a mediocre speech, which is a real possibility, ultimately it ends up highlighting how the GOP wishes they had chosen someone more like Palin for the top of the ticket instead of the safe ?next guy in line? candidate ala Gore, Dole, etc. It?s a tight rope to walk and we?ll see how they proceed in the next two days.

    • Moriah

      I personally disagree.

      I am not going to say that she should not ‘come out swinging’ in regards to Obama’s policies. I personally think that yes, distinguishing herself and her policies from Obama/Biden should be her goal, and it will not help her to appear weak.

      However, considering the absolutely vicious personal attacks being made against her, that attacking Barack for the actions of his parents when he was young (taking him to a Muslim country to live, allowing a Muslim to adopt him, etc) are not going to help and may make people think they are justified in continuing to attack Sarah on issue that are not germane to the election. While I personally subscribe to the belief that another person’s hypocrisy does not justify my own, some of my fellow Democrats do not (although I am hoping the ones that are showing that side of themselves are a small minority just being incredibly vocal).

      His cocaine use is a reasonable place to go, for a person who has not admitted to drug use themselves. Of course, when she used marijuana it was legal in her state for her to do so, and that is an important distinction. What is more important than youthful indiscretions, however, is how the person chooses to use those experiences. Sarah has said that she did not want to discuss her drug use with her children because she was very concerned that they might feel that it was okay ‘because Mom did it’ — she has shown that she wants to prevent teens from following down that path.

      And as for religion… this is just my personal opinion here, and you can take it or leave it as you like. But I do not think that any Christian would say that Jesus does not have the power to save the soul of a Muslim, or that just because Muslims believe that “once a Muslim always a Muslim” means it is true.

      … I’m probably going out of left field here (wow, no pun intended, I swear)… but this kind of post seems very similar to the “moby” posts that other people have been called out on. I don’t know you or your history, however.

      Again, just my opinions here. I may not be planning to vote for the Republican ticket, but that doesn’t mean I feel it is right or fair for people to attack someone on issues that have nothing to do with their ability to govern, regardless of if the person being attacked agrees with me or not.

      • bs

        You may be a liberal, but I’m liking your presence here more and more. Good response. “han_solo” is indeed just as bad as the leftist trolls we’ve been seeing here lately.

        • Moriah

          My grandmother thinks I’m crazy to talk about politics. She knows I hold very liberal views, and she’s afraid that they’re going to get me in trouble someday. She feels that a person’s political views are really no one else’s business, and that a person’s decision in that booth is a completely private one. She has shown she believes what she says by absolutely refusing to ever say who she voted for. (Her only comment about Sarah Palin being chosen was that she was disappointed that McCain hadn’t chosen Mike Huckabee — she really likes our ex-governor.)

          However, I find politics fascinating. It’s one of the few subjects that everyone has an opinion on, even if they choose not to discuss their opinions. And while discussions might get heated, if all sides are willing to be intellectual and honest the discussions can be quite enlightening.

          The main reason I am here is that I don’t feel that a person can critically analyze their own opinions and make informed decisions if the only people they talk to feel the same way as they do. The whole “preaching to the choir” idea. I do participate in liberal discussion boards — with this same screenname — and often I get into disagreements there too. But I really enjoy talking to people who disagree with me, because it lets me see the faults in my own logic.

  • Kate_Shanahan

    Good points. I just think that Palin must, must confront the media on their unquestionable double standard.

    She should just look the camera in the eye and dare them to cover Obama and Biden in the same tone and with the same depth and enmity.

    • BrianH

      You will never have a problem here.

      I welcome future debates on matters of policy.

      • ruhtra

        Giving any credence to political statements made by Lindsay Lohan or P Diddy is like caring what Rush Limbaugh or Sean Hannity think about the latest rap or hip-hop album.

  • tcgeol

    Those are great suggestions, Dan. I haven’t seen the enthusiasm locally that exists here on Redstate for Sarah, but with a good speech tonight she could do a lot to overcome that.

    If she follows your suggestions, she could help herself tremendously and give a big boost to the ticket. I especially have to agree with the “girl power” part. We already know her sex, now we need to get to know her.