« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Memo to McCain Camp: Washington Has Failed. Send in Gov. Palin.

Can This Bailout Bill Be Saved?

So neither party’s House leadership was able to deliver the votes to save the bailout. As Erick noted above, John McCain fought valiantly but came up short in trying to find support in his own caucus, while Barack Obama sat on his hands:

Mr. Holtz-Eakin said Mr. McCain had made “dozens of calls” on the bill, some to House Republicans who opposed it.

Aides to Mr. Obama said he had not directly reached out to try to sway any House Democrats who opposed the measure.

It seems to me that if the deal is to be saved, and the McCain camp wants to get the credit, it may be time for a last-ditch effort to combine leadership with pure political theater, and send in Sarah Palin.

The ideal resolution here would be to get the whip count from Roy Blunt of the most-wavering Republicans, the people who might yet be persuaded to change their minds, and have Gov. Palin burn the phone lines and round up 12 House conservatives who voted against the bailout but could be talked into switching now that we have seen the ugliness that followed Monday’s vote. Given suddenly softening public opposition to the deal after yesterday’s market crash, this may yet be possible, and given that the holdouts include a lot of rural/small town Republicans, Gov. Palin may be just the person to speak their language. Surely, she could fairly promise in return to campaign in their districts and defend their decision to skeptical voters. Then, hold a joint press conference hailing them as heroes for biting the bullet to switch their votes and save the economy and, while she’s at it, explain to the media that she has learned as a Governor that being a doer matters more than being a talker. “Nancy Pelosi, here are the votes you couldn’t deliver in your own caucus. Now, let’s get beyond finger-pointing and do the people’s business.”

That would be a political masterstroke. Unlike many other solutions now being mooted about, it could be accomplished entirely by conservative Republicans without the assistance of a single Democrat or wobbly moderate. It would instantly stand the entire blame debate on its head and totally and immediately remake Gov. Palin’s reputation going into Thursday’s debate. While there’s no guarantee that Democrats wouldn’t find another way to stymie the bill, they’d at least then have to take full responsibility for doing so.

Of course, dramatic gestures of that nature are easier said than done. But I can’t see why it would not be worth a try.

COMMENTS

  • Patricia_C

    A gesture such as this by Sarah Palin would be just as (if not more severely) trashed as a “political stunt” as was McCain’s suspension of his campaign to also attempt a solution to this mess.

    And, of course… the media and the democrats will ignore the fact that Biden (as with Barack)is also doing pretty much… nothing at all, in spite of the fact that they are both senators and solving this is currently… their JOB.

    • Dan_McLaughlin

      Not if she had a list of names that showed that the tide had turned.

      I mean, they could try. But the truth helps, sometimes.

  • jdripper

    if this worked the media would give all the credit to Pelosi. Leave her to campaign and kick ass there.

  • Dan_McLaughlin
  • Siberian

    Which I really think it did.

    I think you’ll see a push out of the Democrats to pass their own completely different take on a bailout plan now that the “bipartisan” bill blew up.

    And this time they’ll stuff it full of ideas they like and just push it through the house.

    Then if the Senate Republican’s filibuster it, the Democrats will once again jump on TV screaming the GOP is putting politics first/blah blah. Market will slide again and thus far bad economic news seems to benefit the Democrats.

    If they don’t filibuster and it passes your left with Bush having to veto a bailout bill over disagreements on it or pass it even if it’s stuffed full of democrats bad ideas.

    I don’t see how this isn’t a win/win for them at this point.

    • Patricia_C

      The truth, however, doesn’t help at all if no one knows what it is.

      The democrats and the media are intentionally covering up the truth… a LOT of truth, especially regarding Barack and Pelosi’s New Congress.
      In the meantime, the republicans (particularly McCain) seem too intent on maintaining a picture of public peace and unity (and some such nonsense) rather than on shaking things up the way McCain keeps SAYING he’s going to do as president.

      I was so geeked today when Rush echoed what I have been saying all day here (and for months to everyone who will listen).

      McCain was talking about how difficult bipartisanship is and Rush said “NO IT ISN’T, SENATOR!”

      It isn’t playing nice-nice and trying to come to agreements and compromises that is difficult. All that means is you end up with a plan that’s half-way from wrong on both sides.

      The hard part is doing what is right. Perhaps that is the reason why so few people DO the right thing because “the right thing” is never easy, is rarely popular and always requires a willingness to make a sacrifice.

      McCain said he’d rather lose an election than a war. As I mentioned in an earlier thread, perhaps McCain only meant losing a war to terrorists who want to destroy us from outside our country rather than democrats trying to destroy our country from Capitol Hill.

      • liberalrepublican

        If the Dem’s are for it, the Republican are against it and vice versa.

        That is the top principle in Washington and do anything, say anything to get elected in the second principle.

        Right now, honest principles be dammed.

        It’s a dysfunctional mess and anyone who thinks their party is always (or mostly) right, is nuts.

        A pox on all their houses.

        • Martin_A_Knight

          Is there really any point of view you hold on any issue that is not based on liberal premises?

          • liberalrepublican

            I don’t think that is leftie politics.

            I am for free markets – good and bad.

            I don’t think that is leftie.

          • Martin_A_Knight

            Ever since you registered, on almost every issue, you always take a position well to the Left of center and defend your views with Lefty talking points (more softly put, of course).

            I really don’t see what, if anything, makes you a Republican – sort of like Lincoln Chafee.

            PS: There are some top of the line Conservatives who support the bailout as well as oppose it. And there are hard left liberals who support the bailout as well as some who oppose it.

            Heck, I’m not quite so certain you’ve been so gung-ho on the free market here before …

          • liberalrepublican

            I am not a social convservative – far from it.

            I am a strong, very strong, supporter of smaller government – which puts me at odds many times on this site with many Republican ideas.

            I happen to think that Washington is a total mess and I don’t have faith in either party, and look at Republicans as the lesser of two evils.

            I happen to agree with the Obama tax cuts and McCain has been my man since 2000.

            I do think Palin is in way over her head and needs to pay her dues if she really wants to be a national candidate.

          • SwampRat

            Picking Palin was the the dumbest thing the party could do. She is a moronic high school cheerleader and embarrassing.

            A couple days after the debate, she is taped in a sandwich place saying we should go into Pakistan, blatantly contradicting McCain. Did she NOT watch the debate? Is she retarded?

            My opinion is anyone who has attended succession meetings is about as unpatriotic as you can get and they shouldn’t even be aloud on the White House tour.

            Picking Palin and this whole “postponing the campaign” gimic makes the whole party look desparate.

          • SwampRat

            Sorry, that should have read “has attended secession meetings”.

          • liberalrepublican

            Trolls pretending to be Republicans.

            You are so clever.

  • Harod

    VP debate moderator Ifill releasing pro-Obama book
    ELECTION 2008
    VP debate moderator Ifill releasing pro-Obama book
    Focuses on blacks who are ‘forging a bold new path to political power’

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=76645

  • Harod

    VP debate moderator Ifill releasing pro-Obama book
    ELECTION 2008
    VP debate moderator Ifill releasing pro-Obama book
    Focuses on blacks who are ‘forging a bold new path to political power’

    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=76645

  • ThrillerJesus

    Yes, as unlikely as it is, I guess everyone on both sides is hoping for a Palin press conference some time before Election Day.

  • liberalrepublican

    Palin has looked HORRIBLE in any setting other than a speech – the CBS interview was embarrassing.

    She has to be sent quietly to a corner and not let out.

    The worst thing would be to make here front and center – she just isn’t up for that yet.

    McCain needs to be the one who makes the deal happen (although I want no deal) if anybody.

  • Dan_McLaughlin

    The bad interviews are precisely why it would be a good idea to show that she can work behind the scenes.

    Good speeches + bad interviews + no accomplishments = Obama

    Good speeches + bad interviews + accomplishments = Much better mix.

  • Vegas_Rick

    She hasn’t looked good in the gotcha interviews. Big deal. If they’d just let her be herself, she’d be fine.