« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

Stay Class-Conscious, Barack Obama

Proletarians Unite!

From the annals of silly, and perhaps revealingly silly, arguments – an email from the Obama campaign following last night’s debate repeats a line he’s used before:

I will fight for the middle class every day, and — once again — Senator McCain didn’t mention the middle class a single time during the debate.

It’s true that Senator McCain didn’t use the words “middle class.” But let’s go to the transcript and look at what he did say:

I think you have to look at my record and you have to look at his. Then you have to look at our proposals for our economy, not $860 billion in new spending, but for the kinds of reforms that keep people in their jobs, get middle-income Americans working again, and getting our economy moving again.

+++

So let’s not raise anybody’s taxes, my friends, and make it be very clear to you I am not in favor of tax cuts for the wealthy. I am in favor of leaving the tax rates alone and reducing the tax burden on middle-income Americans by doubling your tax exemption for every child from $3,500 to $7,000.

+++

When he ran for the United States Senate from Illinois, he said he would have a middle-income tax cut. You know he came to the Senate and never once proposed legislation to do that?

That’s right: on three occasions, McCain used the term “middle income” to describe Americans whose incomes are in the middle of the spectrum. Apparently, Senator McCain doesn’t think in terms of dividing Americans by “class” or running to represent only one such class against others; he simply looks at income groupings to discuss how his plans will affect people at different income levels. He doesn’t think of himself, being a wealthy man, as being in a different class of people than everybody else. In terms of language, the difference is subtle, and for most of us the terms are interchangeable…what is telling is how indignant Senator Obama is that McCain would not think in terms of class.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • CSUFBomb

    …”free markets” or “capitalism” or “personal responsibility” or “Barney Frank loves Fannie Mae” or “my favorite ice cream is pistachio” . . . he’s obviousloy out of touch.

  • aaronbg

    Because he doesn’t believe in it. Apparently to Barack and his ilk we are a feudal system that offers no opportunity for advancement from class to class. This is truly an odd position for Obama to hold considering all the advantages he had in lifting himself to the next class. Furthermore it is odd because his policies would ensure a feudal system. I assume now that Barack is in the higher class he would like to keep the club small.

  • sayward

    McCain has been successfully branded as out of touch with middle-class Americans. Now, when he speaks, low information voters don’t “hear” his non-literal references to the “middle-class.”

    I don’t think most Americans have a problem with recognizing there is a class system in America. Most Americans, sometimes very unrealistically, describe themselves as “middle-class.” There used to be more movement between classes in the U.S. The leeway for movement has been decreasing, but there are still many opportunities for the lucky and/or energetic.

    McCain is doing himself no favors if he is consciously avoiding the term “middle-class” because he doesn’t want to risk the specter of a “class war,” since most Americans don’t see the issue that way.

    • Pomme

      if he does use the term, he will be pounced upon by the media elite as playing class warfare.

      Maybe we should all take up McCain’s argument and stop using the term!

      I am Middle-Income America!

  • JLenardDetroit

    I love to remind these peeps that keep this up in discussions about town that…

    We Republicans care about a Nation with opportunity and true-equality for ALL. We are concerned for ALL AMERICANS, not just pandering and promoting divisiveness amongst class, race, gender, etc…

    Reminding them that it is Democrats that continue to make Race and Gender “Issues” and part of their arguments, not Republicans – we elect based on “Ideals” not skin-tone, body-parts, type of car driven, number of houses owned. Actions, not Rhetoric, matters.

    … it irritates them, and I love it!