« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

FRONT PAGE CONTRIBUTOR

The Palin Push-Back

The Evidence-Based Community vs. The "Reality-Based Community"

As has often happened with Gov. Sarah Palin during the campaign, we’ve had a battery of headlines from a single report, putatively based on an unnamed source, and only later do we get the facts. Let’s look at some of the McCain and Palin aides now going on the record to respond:

Let’s start with Meg Stapleton, one of the few people on Palin’s staff who wasn’t originally a McCain aide:

Stapleton told ABC News the Fox News report on Africa and NAFTA was taken out of context. She explained that during a briefing session, someone asked Palin to explain the McCain-Palin stance on an issue, and as she was responding, “in the middle, she said ‘country of Africa’ and somebody instantly wrote it down and said, ‘Oh, my God, she thinks it’s a country.’”

But “she knows it’s a continent,” Stapleton said. “It was just a human mistake, just like Obama saying 57 states. I don’t think anyone ever doubted that Obama knows there are 50 states.”

+++

Regarding the $150,000 worth of clothing, Stapleton claimed it was the campaign that said, “This is what you need as a VP candidate, and it was the campaign and/or the RNC [Republican National Committee] — but it wasn’t the governor — saying this is what she needs.”

Stapleton added that a New York stylist was told to go and make Palin look presidential, that Palin was simply presented with her wardrobe and staff and told, “Here’s your people, here are your clothes.”

The only items Palin remembers requesting from staff are toothpaste and coats for cold weather, Stapleton said.

Palin even saw a price tag of $3,500 on one suit jacket and said she didn’t want to wear it, Stapleton said — but she was told to wear it anyway.

Stapleton claimed there also was a directive to buy any and all clothes before Sept. 4, the day the Republican convention in St. Paul, Minn., ended, so that it could be buried as part of other convention costs.

*

Then we have McCain foreign policy adviser Steve Biegun:

He says there’s no way she didn’t know Africa was a continent, and whoever is saying she didn’t must be distorting “a fumble of words.” He talked to her about all manner of issues relating to Africa, from failed states to the Sudan. She was aware from the beginning of the conflict in Darfur, which is followed closely in evangelical churches, and was aware of Clinton’s AIDS initiative. That basically makes it impossible that she thought all of Africa was a country.

On not knowing what countries are in NAFTA, Biegun was part of the conversation that led to that accusation and it convinces him “somebody is acting with a high degree of maliciousness.” He was briefing Palin before a Univision interview, and talking to her about trade issues. He rolled through NAFTA, CAFTA, and the Colombia FTA. As he talked, people were coming in and out of the room, handing Palin things, etc. She was distracted from what Biegun was saying, and said, roughly, “Ok, who’s in NAFTA, what the deal with CAFTA, what’s up the FTA?” – her way, Biegun says, of saying “rack them and stack them,” begin again from the start. “Somebody is taking a conversation and twisting it maliciously,” he says.

More from Biegun and other more general statements of support on the record from Tracey Schmitt here. You can read Randy Scheunemann’s defense here. On NAFTA:

Scheunemann suggested the Africa and NAFTA incidents were inaccurate.

“I was not present for all of her sessions, so I can’t disprove that,” he told ABC News. “I severely doubt that it is accurate. It’s certainly not accurate in any of the sessions I had with her.”

More here from Scheunemann and Nicolle Wallace defending Palin on the record (“The only thing I’ve seen her ask for is a diet soda.”).

Steve Schmidt:

Steve Schmidt, the campaign’s chief strategist, defended Mrs. Palin in an e-mail exchange with The Times concerning, among other articles, a Newsweek report that at the Republican National Convention in St. Paul, Minn., Mrs. Palin had greeted Mr. Schmidt and Mr. Salter in her hotel room while “wearing nothing but a towel, with another [towel] on her wet hair.”

“The towel story categorically is not true,” Mr. Schmidt told The Times in the course of telephone and e-mail exchanges over the weekend.

(The Washington Times report has more quotes from people properly noting, in any event, that the informality suggested by that story isn’t exactly unusual on the campaign trail).

Charlie Black, on the NAFTA and other specific stories:

“Answer to all of this is no, except she was victim of hoax perpetrated by Canadian talk radio re Sarkozy,” Mr. Black said. “Even then, she said nothing wrong in the call. We think she did an excellent job and added a lot to the ticket. ‘We’ includes John McCain.”

And here, of course, is Gov. Palin’s own response:

Believe what you want, but in my book when you have multiple named sources standing by specific accounts, and on the other side you have reporters making vague allegations purportedly based on the word of unnamed and unidentifiable sources, the people going on the record and giving specifics have the better argument.

You can watch more of Gov. Palin’s most recent press conference back home in Alaska here.

COMMENTS

  • Susannah

    By the way, this morning on “Morning Joe”, I heard Joe Scarborough specifically state that Nicole Wallace wasn’t even trying to go back into Republican politics and didn’t want to work on future campaigns–that she was trying to get a job in the media instead. Therefore, she has absolutely no motivation to slander Palin in order to cover her own *ss.

    Anyway, I aways thought that McCain had nothing to do with this, and I wanted to hear more evidence before I joined a circular firing squad and jumped on Nicole Wallace or Steve Schmidt–falsely accusing people makes me nervous. I like to have all of the facts first. :-)

    • finaljeopardy

      None of these people (except for Randy Sheuneman possibly) should ever work on a campaign again. It was that threat that made them finally come forward and set the record straight. McCain himself has yet to do so which speaks volumes for his character and sense of honor.

  • davo

    First the anti-Palin accusations are as thick as a Montana blizzard. Then suddenly no one seems to know where they came from. I guess the culprit must be Annonymous.Or maybe it was Not Me. Well neither of them will ever be able to get a job in politics again.

  • Scope

    Someone is telling Cameron these tall tales. Or is Cameron telling his own tall tales? I was surprised that he was the one choosen to follow her campaign, he never seemed to be even a Republican in the past.

  • jdripper

    Carl Cameron screwed up big time and Fox News does not have the guts to have him apologize.

    Oh wait he was on God’s show Bill O’Reilly and we all know how he never makes mistakes.

  • aceintx

    nt

  • redstatedawn

    Conservatives need to be ready to fight starting right now! We need to defend our own and COUNTERATTACK ferociously against the vicious Dem attack machine. Talk about what we want to talk about not what they want to us to talk about. The substance of these attacks against Gov. Palin is absurd and weak and someone needs to corner Carl Cameron in the men?s room and find out if this is really coming from the left. YOU REALLY HAVE TO BELIEVE THE AFRICA THING IS A RACIAL POLITICS ATTACK. KGB tactics. Welcome to the new regime. Sarah Palin is being attacked because she is a threat to them. She is such a stark and appealing contrast to them. Where they are murderously cold about the unborn and indeed life, she is lovingly warm, you know; like you?d expect a mom, a mother, a human being to be.
    President Bush?s rating is so low in part because when he made the hard choices the Republicans did not defend him. As soon as the dems attack they assume the fetal kick me position instead of counterattacking and breaking teeth. So as soon as the dems start being mean the Republicans started caving and before you know you can?t tell them apart. Why have the dems not paid for trying to lose this war during this election? Why haven?t they paid for their subservience to the UN given the UN/Saddam bribery scandal and 100 other things?
    Starting today Conservatives need to make them pay and we are in the position to do it. 1st assignment: listen to Reagan?s speeches because he outed their idiot freedom robbing policies. Reagan shows how easy it is to debunk them because their rhetoric is a sham designed to cover their socialistic programs (Marxist in the case of the Obama). McCain should have branded that bogus 95% number and that focus group tested class envy $250k number on Obama?s forehead so everyone would laugh just to look at him. Instead he had a conversation with him about it. DEBUNK THE DEMS DON?T DEBATE THEM.
    How about this: ?Dems want more government and less free enterprise but remember less free enterprise means less freedom.? Simple concept eh? Always say free enterprise not capitalism because the # 1 word and thought associated with Conservatives should be FREEDOM.
    Start kicking teeth. NOW!

    • Susannah

      Jack, I think that you hit the nail right on the head. I think that this all started because Carl Cameron repeated gossip from some second rate source without first verifying if it was true or not (and McCain can’t refute the source, because no one really knows who it is yet). Anyway, what really should happen is that Fox News should retract the story and apologize–but, I doubt that they will.

  • MCPO_Airdale

    Still I wait for MAVERICK to come out and condemn this nonsense. . . crickets

    • Next93

      Now I can appreciate how surprised the allies must have been in April ’45 when they discovered that there had never been more than 5 Nazis in all of Berlin (and THEY were all dead!).

      • wt259

        it might have been idunnoknow, or wuzntme. And downthread, I totally agree with Susannah, Fox should either have Cameron verify his “story” by naming sources, or they should apologize for running a story that wasn’t verified.

  • SAZMD

    He admits it in this post. Apologies if this was already known.

    http://www.eisenstadtgroup.com/2008/11/10/eisenstadt-the-source-for-sarah-palin-africa-leak-and-proud-of-it/#comment-2081

    • SAZMD

      Some are saying that is a hoax, as I just saw.

      http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlDC/newsnotes/martineisenstadtiwascarlcameronssource100202.asp

  • Pete_in_GA

    On topic:

    I guess Mr. Bill is mad that Gov. Sarah Palin did not go on his show. As for Fox, maybe they were just trying to make sure they got a press pass in January.

    Off topic:

    My advice Gov. Palin, -just say No to Oprah!.

    • towdogInCal

      The best reason I can think of for Wallace to slime Palin is because she’s trying to work in a liberal dominated media establishment as a former McCain/Palin campaign worker.
      She picked the town she wanted, the other she’ll never work in again.

  • MikeInOhio

    Really, who would even say something as accurate as ‘country of Egypt’? It’s too awkward. To me, ‘country of Africa’ doesn’t ring true at all.

    Much more likely is a reference to ‘countries of Africa’. But reporters have demonstrated that they can apply selective hearing (remember Bush’s 16 words) to transform anything said to be anything they want to report.

  • casel21

    O’Reilly had Cameron on his show to dump all this stuff about Palin to blackmail Palin into coming onto his show.

    This is not past O’Reilly a/k/a Ted Baxter as Mark Levin calls him. He is the same man who helped the Saudi government hold 2 American women in captivity just to get an interview.

    WSJ September 2000, The Blowhard Zone

    • kyle8

      O’Reilly might not be perfect, but he is the closest thing we have to a real investigative journalist left in this country, which is kinda sad.

  • RedNeckState

    Why are people defending her? It was a mistake to pick her as VP. Let’s just admit that and move on.

    This woman is just plain ignorant. She can’t even put together a grammatically correct sentence.

    Can’t we just move on? Seriously… just forget her and move on.

    The Presidency is something that should be earned. It’s not something you should be able to back into.

    There are much better people in the Republican Party to carry us forward. You know, my suspicion is that the liberal media is keeping Sarah Palin in the news because as long as she’s seen as the future head of the Republican Party, the Republican Party has no future.

    For God’s sake, wake the heck up!!! Let’s move on from Sarah Palin and get behind someone who has intelligence and qualifications!

    • itrytobenice

      And you sure look like a little sissy pansy for quaking in your socks at the thought of her.