It Depends Upon What The Meaning Of The Word “Lobbyist” Is


There Is No Such Thing As New Politics

It Depends What The Meaning IsJake Tapper notices that Obama’s nominee for US Trade Representative, former Dallas Mayor Ron Kirk, worked as a state and local lobbyist in Dallas; Tapper notes that he’s at least the fifth lobbyist picked for a significant position in the Obama Administration (and that’s before we consider family members like Joe Biden’s son or Tom Daschle’s wife). Here’s the Administration’s defense:

“Ron Kirk has never been a registered federal lobbyist,” White House spokesman Ben LaBolt told ABC News….”How precisely is it a loophole when we never pledged to bar state lobbyists?” a Democratic official asks.

(Emphasis mine). Hey, isn’t that a tune we have heard before?

As Tapper notes, that’s not exactly what Obama on the campaign trail led people to believe:

[T]hough the president at his most precise has railed against former “federally registered lobbyists” running his administration, at other times he has not been so precise, and his language on the matter at times may have given many Americans the impression that state and local lobbyists — who in many instances bring the same baggage as federal lobbyists — would be kept from working in his administration as well.

Now, personally, while it’s worth taking a long look at the lobbying background of anyone looking to get into government to see who they owe favors to, I don’t actually think being a lobbyist is any less honorable a profession than my own (lawyer), and the role of a lobbyist is inherent in the First Amendment right to organize and petition the government for redress of grievances. As I noted during the campaign, Obama himself once worked as essentially a lobbyist - what else is a “community organizer” but someone who lobbies the government on behalf of the interests of particular people? (In fact, John McCain had also worked as a Washington lobbyist for the U.S. Navy near the end of his time in the service - his official title was as a Congressional “liaison,” but the job was functionally indistinguishable from that of a lobbyist for private sector interests). If lobbyists have too much influence in Washington - and most of us would agree they do - it’s not because of the nefarious influence of lobbyists but for two related reasons: (1) because the federal government has grown to such a scale and insinuated itself in so many aspects of life that it is in position to do enormous favors or inflict enormous damage on private businesses; and (2) because Congress in particular is willing to write special rules favoring or disfavoring particular businesses to benefit its friends. That power, after all, is a valuable thing; should they give it away for free? And companies that don’t want to play ball quickly learn they need to; as Jonah Goldberg likes to point out, Bill Gates once boasted that Microsoft’s one Washington lobbyist had no work to do and Washington was “not on our radar”; after the Justice Department came after the company with a series of antitrust lawsuits at the behest of its more plugged-in competitors, Microsoft changed its tune and started hiring lobbyists and making campaign contributions like everybody else.

If you want money out of politics, you first need to get politics out of money. It’s the only way. And that’s absolutely the last thing Barack Obama is going to do; it’s not in his background, and it’s certainly not in his policy programs, from more regulations to massive pork-barrel “stimulus” bills to buying big banks.

But while I was never naive enough to believe that Obama intended his talk about lobbyists and “new politics” to be anything but window-dressing on an expansion of the role of the federal government’s favor factory, and while anyone who paid attention during the campaign had to know that, the amount of stress Obama put on those themes during the campaign means it is entirely fair game to keep pointing out what a false bill of goods he sold the public. Any serious adult had to know that “new politics” was never meant to do anything but get Barack Obama elected. Which only makes it funnier watching him come up with excuses for why he’s still doing business as usual.

Category: , ,

RSS feed | Trackback URI

4 Comments Leave a comment

Is it my imagination or

youthgrunt Tuesday, February 24th at 10:55AM EST (link)

Is it my imagination or is Jake Tapper about the only MSM reporter actually doing his job? Kudos to Jake.

 

Obama left such an oozing trail of campaign-promise slime

E Pluribus Unum Tuesday, February 24th at 11:58AM EST (link)

that it is just indecent not to pound him into goo over said broken promises. Downright irresponsible, I’d say.

Lobbyists were always the proverbial straw man anyway. When discussing what exactly has poisoned the atmosphere in Washington, it really ain’t lobbyists. They would not be in line for favors if favors were not being routinely dispensed.

Like most Obama targets, they are purely targets of opportunity,

Carthago delenda est
Do your conservative t-shirt Christmas shopping at EPU Gear. Save the conservative muse, save the world.

There are lobbyists and there are lobbyists.

Achance Tuesday, February 24th at 12:06PM EST (link)

The Ds had the lobbyist market cornered for almost 50 years. No D ever had a tab and all Ds got the inside scoop and the insider deal. The Gingrich Revolution changed all that and there was a reason for the K Street Project. Political types being as they are, the lobbyists would just hedge their bets and keep their heads down to see how long it would take to restore America’s rightful rulers. So, the Rs went on a program to make them declare and made it clear that a hedged bet was no bet at all.

Comes the counter-revolution and the lobbyists who did align with the Rs are the bad lobbyists that can’t play in the D sandbox. Other lobbyists are just fine.

In Vino Veritas

 
 

This is why

red4ever Tuesday, February 24th at 12:43PM EST (link)

I am not watching his speech tonight. It does not matter what Obama SAYS, it is what he does.

The hottest places in hell are reserved for those who, in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality.
Dante

 

Leave a Comment

 

Be respectful, or be banned. No Profanity.