<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/dan_mclaughlin/2011/01/24/why-2012-is-not-1996/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 19:14:52 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Why 2012 Is Not 1996</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[A little history can be a dangerous thing, and in advance of Tuesday&amp;#8217;s State of the Union Address by President Obama, political commentary will be focusing on Obama&amp;#8217;s ability to replay 1995-96, when President Clinton rebounded from a similar rout in the midterm elections to more or less coast to re-election (while Clinton finished below 50% of the popular vote, it was only a &amp;#8220;coming home&amp;#8221; of Republicans in the campaign&amp;#8217;s closing weeks that averted a more lopsided result; the outcome was not seriously in doubt).]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 13:30:01 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Dan McLaughlin]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/dan_mclaughlin/2011/01/24/why-2012-is-not-1996-n37716</link></item></channel></rss>