<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/dan_mclaughlin/2011/06/09/the-perils-of-complexity/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 12:52:24 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>The Perils of Complexity</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[As a practicing lawyer, I naturally have a professional interest in vague and/or complex legal rules that require lots of expensive legal research, training and experience to understand and explain.  But complexity isn&amp;#8217;t just costly to consumers of legal services, and thus a burden on business as well as on citizen access to the courts.  It&amp;#8217;s also a drag on the economy and on personal liberty, as businesses and ordinary citizens must choose between paying lots of compliance lawyers or steering too wide of increasingly large gray areas.  It risks in particular the unfair, arbitrary and sometimes corrupt or discriminatory abuse of the criminal justice system to prosecute things that were hard to foresee as violations of the law.  And it demeans democracy, as the actual making of law is done by judges and bureaucrats rather than citizen-elected legislators.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2011 13:35:11 -0400</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Dan McLaughlin]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/dan_mclaughlin/2011/06/09/the-perils-of-complexity-n39297</link></item></channel></rss>