<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><title>RedState</title><link>https://redstate.com/dan_mclaughlin/2012/01/25/establishments-and-our-money-a-response-to-avik-roy/feed/</link><description>Conservative News &amp; Politics</description><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 20:09:49 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Establishments and Our Money: A Response To Avik Roy</title><description>&lt;![CDATA[Following my essay on the nature of the Establishment vs Tea Party or Outsider divide on the Right as driven primarily by a divide over whether and how we can roll back the seemingly endless growth of spending and the size of government, a number of people offered criticisms.  Some noted that there are longstanding divides between the DC-based professional class (officeholders, staffers, pundits and journalists who have a direct stake in particular people having political power) and those outside.  Which is true and a contributing factor (as any student of public choice theory could tell you), but not new, and in any event self-defeating definition: if the people in power are definitionally opposed to those without, then new elections are purposeless exercises.  History tells us otherwise: the professional class may restrain and co-opt, but there are always those officeholders (new and experienced) who are willing to stick their necks out for genuine changes in the long-term trajectory of public policy.  Others pointed to the cultural divide such as the one that Angelo Codevilla identified in his 2010 essay distinguishing between a Ruling Class and a Country Party.  Codevilla&amp;#8217;s analysis is certainly a useful part of the debate, and is another longstanding fault line that laid the groundwork for the current schism.  But it doesn&amp;#8217;t really reflect why now, at this time, conservatives are willing to lock horns with the organs of Republican and conservative leadership that, in the Bush years, commanded a good deal of loyalty from the rank and file &amp;#8211; willing enough to line up cheering throngs of responsible citizens behind the most unlikely of 21st century populist champions, Newt Gingrich.]]&gt;</description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:00:41 -0500</pubDate><creator xmlns="dc">&lt;![CDATA[Dan McLaughlin]]&gt;</creator><enclosure url="" type="image/jpeg" length="123" /><link>https://redstate.com/dan_mclaughlin/2012/01/25/establishments-and-our-money-a-response-to-avik-roy-n41971</link></item></channel></rss>