In the NYT’s, the Number One Health Reform Bill Killing Issue Gets One Sentence


The abortion issue, you may recall, was described by George Stephanopoulos as “the gravest threat” to the health reform bill. The largest concentration of Democratic NO votes on health care reform are because of the abortion issue.

So, naturally, in an article about Speak Pelosi’s efforts to rally votes for ObamaCare, the New York Times actually talked about other issues besides the public option as critical to passage of the bill. Here is what the New York Times said about abortion yesterday:

“House Democratic leaders are still trying to figure out exactly how to limit the use of federal money for abortions.”

In other words, they know that their current language will not satisfy, among others, the Catholic Church, which issued a change it or else threat. But the Democratic Leadership has not figured out what to do. The demands of the pro-life Democrats have been really straight-forward, give us a vote on our amendments to ban federally funded abortions and allow medical providers the ability to refuse to perform or help perform abortions.

What this really means is that the Speaker does not want to compromise and allow pro-life amendments, unless she has absolutely no other choice in the matter.

On that issue, the NYT reports “Ms. Pelosi said she had not decided whether lawmakers would be allowed to offer amendments on the House floor.”

The Speaker will not allow the pro-life Democrats to offer and get votes on their amendments. She has not said yes, meaning she is now at no.

Further, the need to get CBO to score the bill before it gets to the House floor was also acknowledged as another complication, as the NYT reported: “In addition, before taking their bill to the House floor, Democrats need to get a cost estimate from the Congressional Budget Office.” This is no small matter, since scoring takes about two week, once CBO has the language in hand.

There are other issues that are causing intra-Dem heartburn, and one of them is the Democratic Governors who are very concerned about the unfunded mandates the federal government is imposing on State governments. A Medicaid concerns letter signed by more than a dozen (14) Democratic Senators, sent late last week to Senators Reid, Baucus and Dodd, can be found here.

It is useful to note that the Speaker does not have the votes for ObamaCare now, nor will she likely anytime soon. Other vote draining issues on the Democratic side are the cuts to Medicare Advantage, the public option, the spending and tax levels of the bill and whether to give illegal immigrants benefits under the bill.


RSS feed

4 Comments Leave a comment

I think that abortions should be covered...

nyindy Monday, October 26th at 12:21PM EST (link)

In cases where the mother’s life is in danger.

Otherwise, it should be treated as any other elective procedure and not covered by any insurance.

“When a man finds a conclusion agreeable, he accepts it without argument, but when he finds it disagreeable, he will bring against it all the forces of logic and reason.” -Thucydides

 

Public Approval of Health Care Reform

earlgrey (Diary) Monday, October 26th at 2:27PM EST (link)

despite all the bad press the health care reform plans have been getting, the approval on Rasmussen was up to 45% from 42% this week. Any ideas as to why? It makes me wonder how people get their news.

 

The Times statement was poorly worded

RedBeard Monday, October 26th at 5:47PM EST (link)

“House Democratic leaders are still trying to figure out exactly how to limit the use of federal money for abortions.”

Should read, “House Democratic leaders are still trying to figure out exactly how to limit public discussion about their desire to use taxpayer funds to kill even more unborn children.”

Standard-bearer for grouchy curmudgeonry since, oh, 1975 or so.

 

House Committee on Energy & Commerce

amigag Monday, October 26th at 6:26PM EST (link)

One of the Amendments to HR 3200 in the Energy & Commerce Committee

An amendment offered by Rep. Capps D-CA., would allow for immediate federal funding of elective abortion coverage through the public plan, permit taxpayer subsidies of private plans that cover elective abortion, and mandate that all areas of the country contain one private plan that covers abortion. For a detailed vote tally and text of this amendment, click here.

This amendment passed by a vote of 30 to 28.

***********************************************************************************

There are 36 Democrats on this Committee and 23 Republicans.
Since these now “House Democrats” are not named, it is difficult to charge hypocrisy. But the roll call votes would show not only the final vote on H.R. 3200, but on the many amendments that were passed , including the one I sited above. In addition, many other amendments that the Republicans offered and voted down by this Committee. Representative Joe Pitts (R-PA) offered an Amendment to Prohibit a Federal mandate for abortion coverage and this was also voted down. I would love to know who these “House Democrats” are.