« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Education Reform Cannot Wait

Promoted from the diaries

The time for real change and big ideas in the education arena is now. We can no longer afford to sit idle while a generation of Americans receive a second class education from a first class country. It is unfathomable that in the wealthiest country in the world our minority and low income communities have limited educational opportunities. There are some statistics that are hard to ignore and one that bleeds each time is this; of the nation’s 20,000 high schools, 2,000 are responsible for nearly half of the dropouts. If you are one of our nation’s black families you have a 50% chance of sending one of your children to one of these schools. This is not a partisan issue or a political issue but an issue which centers on the fundamental American belief that opportunity is not relegated to those winning the zip code lottery.

We can all agree that improvements can and should be made in our education system. Our system has been progressively moving towards a top-down, overly bureaucratic model which allocates funds based on models divorced from student results. We have doubled per-student funding over the past five decades and have seen virtually no noticeable improvement in test scores. These sad numbers belie the fact that bureaucratic top-down models have a sad history of failure and those who defend them are typically the very bureaucrats whose power is enhanced as a result of them.

I propose that the answers are in front of us if we are bold enough to accept them and put down our rhetorical arms in this ideological battle. We can make bold changes now by moving to a system where the parent and child, rather than a zip code, becomes the center of our education universe. Choice in educational facilities has enabled our university system to become the envy of the world, regardless of the zip code the facility is located in. Choice has the potential to rewrite our education future and redefine educational excellence. It is unfortunate that the arguments used to refute this simple proposition strain credulity. Stating that taxpayers should fund public education and yet be ordered where to send their children to school, regardless of the school’s record of success or their personal choice, is un-American at its core.

Local implementation of means-tested voucher based programs would revolutionize our education system with the real winners being American children. Successful schools and excellent teachers would be rewarded with increased demand for their services. Funding would follow as it would be attached to the child and not to the zip code. Schools which fail to attract students due to their inability to produce results would then be subjected to charter takeover. This process will ensure that competition creates a vibrant educational environment for all of our children and failure is no longer sugar coated. From a federal perspective, we can set an example by fully supporting these initiatives in Washington DC.

While engaging in a healthy debate about education change, I want to emphasize that I owe my success to caring, dedicated teachers who rescued me from poverty. Teachers are not now, and have never been, the problem. They are the bedrock of our society and I refuse to believe that any teacher arrives at their schools in the morning without sincerely trying to better the lives of the students they serve. The fault lies with the system we have cornered them into and that should be the focus of our change initiatives. As world economic growth and productivity enhancements transition global economies to ideas-based models, it is imperative that we implement bold changes. It is time to leave behind partisan politics, ideological agendas, and vested interests and put our children, and their futures first.

In conclusion, we can no longer forfeit our minority and low income communities in the world-wide education race for ideas. These children are entitled to a chance at the American dream. We will never know how many transformational ideas could have been launched from communities left out of our collective American dream as a result of educational disparities. The reservoir of ideas being left behind in these communities is a travesty from both a moral and economic perspective and I will make it a centerpiece of my pro-growth plan for economic revitalization.

(Originally published in USATodayEducation.com, January 12, 2012)

Dan Bongino is a Republican Candidate for U.S. Senate from the state of Maryland. He is a decorated Secret Service Agent who served under three presidential administrations, and was the lead security representative for the United States for foreign presidential visits.  Dan is a small business entrepreneur who has obtained graduate degrees in both Psychology and Business Administration. His wife Paula is a first generation immigrant and a successful business owner. Dan and Paula have two children, 8 year old Isabel and newborn Amelia.

Tags:

COMMENTS

  • dvdmsr

    If people don’t like their zip code and the irresponsible people who live there and who make having a quality life and education difficult, then they should move to a house or apartment in a better community. School-of-choice is no sure fix because it is largely unable to filter out irresponsible/poor character students from transferring into and poisoning the culture of another school/community. If responsible parents want a better life and opportunities for their kids, then they owe it to their children to do the responsible thing and move completely out of that terrible community.

    • Caleb Howe

      School choice is about freedom, but it’s also about raising the bar for education in this country. Saying “if you don’t like it, move” isn’t a solution, it’s invective.

      • acat

        dvdmsr is hoping to protect if a small number of kids from another culture are able to destroy it?

        Let’s be serious. School X is failing. In order to leave School X, the parents of the child must (a) recognize that it’s failing and (b) make the effort to enroll their kid in School Y and (c) get the kid from their neighborhood to wherever School Y is .. without help!

        Hint: Anyone who questions whether school choice can work has only to remove the blinders and look at Chicago’s Catholic schools, where – - if the kids are committed to learning and the parent(s) or guardian(s) are committed to getting them there and getting them to do homework, even if there’s no money, they can still go get a first rate education.

        We need more school choice, more challenging of the dominance of the teachers union and hidebound school boards.

        Mew

        • Caleb Howe

          If this country is serious about improving education, school choice must become a top priority.

        • goodolboy

          We should do it as the Europeans do…the money follows the student. I saw a program on TV a year or so ago and the principal of the school said students get to decide what school they want to go to and the money comes with them to that school. If the schools do perform nobody comes to it…just like any other business that is in business to perform a service…you perform or you close. There is always someone wanting your customers and their money. Competition and the free market will work. I heard an “educator” in FL say, “Competition is good but not when it comes to educating the children.” Also, if a kid is a disciplinary problem they are kicked out of school and given a choice to go to an alternative school or drop out. If they drop out, all government assistance the parent(s) is getting is cut off. It’s called taking care of the responsibility for you and your children’s actions. You ask what will happen if the government assistance is cut off? Let the church and neighbors take care of them as was the case before the government started setting out teats for the takers to suck. Maybe an alternative could be to cut the assistance to 50% if the student reeenrolls back in school after 90 days. If the student is no longer a problem after a 90 trial period full 100% would be restored. If the student still is a disciplinary problem…assistance is cut to 0%.

          • Stan(ley) Pruss

            Many home schooled children receive a better education than most in public schools. Nothing is 100%. Responsible home schooling should be encouraged somehow.

          • Flagstaff

            my own recent experience with video-based education makes me think there is a huge opportunity waiting for the entrepreneur who can figure out a way to get it delivered successfully.

            I know there are computer-based education programs, but I don’t know the details. When it comes to delivering good teaching, it would seem to me that it wouldn’t take that many GREAT teachers to create a great teaching program.

            It wouldn’t have to be a home schooling situation, but such a program would eliminate the current non-availability of great teachers and programs in many communities.

          • goodolboy

            However, the idea that only $2500-$5000 out of $8500-$15000 will gut the school as the teachers unions say is a false argument because $6000-$10000 would be left behind without the requirement to teach a student who is not there and would mean the school is making money. As quill67 says, all the money should go with the child. The teachers unions have done more to ruin this country than anything else in history by turning out generations of uneducated children who in turn produced uneducated children who produced uneducated children all who become takers and not makers. Why send children to a school based on zip code when you don’t shop at a grocery store stocked by the government based on your zip code? Didn’t they do something like that in the old USSR?

          • jakee308

            be on target.

            To say that 2,000 schools produce the dropouts is not strictly correct. (it may be likely but not certain).

            Whats’ certain is that the highest dropout rates are at those schools the reasons may not be all the schools fault. Generally schools are making kids dropout. The conditions may be at fault but even there it still takes a parent and a community attitude that allows that choice to be prevalent.

            Much of the reason for dropouts stems from the dropouts themselves. They aren’t learning, don’t care to learn and see school as a waste of time. That’s an attitude that needs to change. That it is prevalent in schools in largely minority neighborhoods also begs the question; who’s at fault? Is it the school system that fails the student or is the political system that fails the school.

            All those questions need to be sorted out.

            The actual FIRST action that needs to be taken is to remove the largest, most powerful block against reformation of the school; THE TEACHER’S UNION.

            Across the board, across the Nation, Unions are the major roadblock to changing the school system and allowing school choice to asset in that change. They spend time and dues to fight school choice legislation everywhere and anytime it’s brought to the public for a vote.

            There by the way is most likely the main reason for a school being a dropout center. Unions and Union teachers with tenure.

            Millions of dollars are spent all over the country to see that bad teachers and teachers charged with crimes are kept on the payrolls due to union contract rules and union contract lawyers.

            It’s also due to the studies being foisted off as education in elementary and high schools.

            Most topics taught will do little to aid a student in pursuing a path to a satisfying well paying job.

            At a time when jobs are being destroyed the Democrat party, schools poorly preparing students to be in the dwindling workforce is a waste of money.

            We would be better off spending the money on trade schools or prisons that continue to fund schools that teach garbage and don’t teach anyone how to live in society or get and keep a job.

            good luck with a national effort though as this problem MUST be tackled locally for it to be worthwhile.

            Note the decline of schools began in earnest after the creation of the Dept. of Education.

            It’s the reverse midas touch of Government. Once Government begins it’s interference, the subject will soon be overrun with costly and worthless regulations that serves more as a job security fountain for bureaucrats.

          • dvdmsr

            We want to teach people to fish not give them a fish each day, but not many care to learn when the fish are handed out for free. I would put the beginning of the decline in education sometime after the war on poverty started.

            It’s hard to encourage responsible behavior in the classroom when it isn’t modeled in many homes and communities, and when irresponsible behavior is often rewarded by entitlement programs like teacher tenure, food stamps, endless unemployment maintenance programs etc.

        • quill67

          Too many times I’ve seen Republicans propose school vouchers and then promise only a fraction of the cost. Public schools in most parts of the country get $8500-15000 per year per student. And timid Republicans promise only $2500 to $5000. Then they wonder why people do not rally to support their plans.

          If we are going to do it, do it right. Promise the full amount of at least $10k per student to be used at any school.

          Did you know Sweeden has had a voucher program instituted in 1994? There any parent can send their child to any school and government money will follow. If Sweeden can do it, so can we.

          • kipling

            Having witnessed the system from the inside, it is clear that the leftists have the educational system they want. It is top-down, bureaucratic, and ensures that power remains with the governing elite. The system is one massive form of indoctrination. It is also a way to pay off their political arm in the various unions associated with education.

            To ask them to lay aside their rhetorical arms will bear no fruit.

            We must overwhelm them at the ballot box.

            I agree with much of what you said. I just do not think we can expect the left to join us. We should be able to sway the people but the leftist elites have too much to lose.

          • demsaresatanic

            it is foolish to try to “set aside politics” and try to work with the people who have wrecked the system, we already know what their objectives are and we have nothing in common with them. Any compromise with the Left is a step backwards and there are few enough steps left until the cliff. The only way for this country to survive is to smash the Left like the insects they are.

          • Bill S

            The education system is the boiling frog of leftism. It went awry in such a way that we didn’t realize the damage that was done until it was over. Now the education system is infested with leftists and turning it around will be virtually impossible. The worst of it is the university system, though – which isn’t really the subject of this diary.

            They were clever little b******s. They knew just where to infiltrate to turn ideologies around from bottom up.

        • dvdmsr

          remain in the slums of Detroit? Are they victims of an unfair system, or something else?

          • dvdmsr

            nt

          • JSobieski

            Seriously, you don’t have to be a bleeding heart to understand that

            (1) Kids cannot force their parents to make sensible decisions
            (2) Responsible adults get get themselves deep into a hole that becomes increasingly hard to get out of

            There are parts of Detroit in which jobs are extremely hard to come by. Most landlards need new tenants to have sufficient money for a security deposit, etc.

            Places like Detroit have lost and will continue to lose population in significant numbers. However, when your resources are low and you have been raised in an environment of dependency, it is no simple matter to just get up and leave.

            Life is hard and life is in fact unfair. Conservatism is acknowledges the realities of life.

          • Dave_A

            Because they can’t afford to move elsewhere, and those who are employed may not be able to find a job elsewhere…

            However, that doesn’t mean that they should be forced to finance a failing school with whatever taxes they pay (And to a one, almost everyone pays state/local taxes that currently finance schools – sales tax, property tax (weather you pay it, or it’s rolled into your rent by your landlord), car tax, etc)…..

        • dvdmsr

          Private schools can and do filter out iresponsible students. They can be exclusive, and they can compel parents to be responsible too under threat of expulsion – public schools cannot so easily do these things.

          Sadly, the legal strings that will certainly come with vouchers may very well deprive private schools of one of the reasons why they do so well – their ability to exclude people of poor character – that are disruptive and unmotivated (irresponsible students and parents).

          • Locked and Loaded

            public schools CAN deal with problem students. They have just adbicated to noisy and unruly parents, and now they do not have the stomach to deal with the problems. The teachers and administrators who will meet the problems head-on (I was in both of these groups) are not supported in the effort.

          • Ausonius

            Cowardice and stupidity will always win if they are not opposed.

            You are quite right: and Catholic schools are also not immune to the idiocy of “the customer is always right” philosophy.

            Education is NOT a commodity: it is (or should be) a moral, psychological, spiritual experience. The assembly line philosophy of education is a recipe for disaster, as we are now seeing.

            Not long ago the father of an 8th Grader broke down in tears in my room, after his son, also in tears, admitted that for over 2 years he had been lying about what happened in my classroom.

            “My son…has been lying to me…for all this time???”

            Yes, children lie to get out of doing what they are supposed tro do!!! EVEN YOUR CHILD LIES!!! That might be hard to believe, but yes, children lie and cheat and steal and that is why we have schools, because that is where basic honesty is supposed to be reinforced.

            But when the parents gullibly believe that their children are ALWAYS honest, and that Teacher X must really have thrown an eraser at them, or insulted an ethnic group, or (my favorite) “embarrassed him in front of the class just because he didn’t have his homework,” when in fact none of that was true, you have developed a person who thinks that dishonesty works, that things should always be easy, and that effort and honesty are for suckers.

            Welcome t the development of an Obama voter!

          • dvdmsr

            One of the many problems with public schools is that the local boards of education often reflect the morals and values in the communities that elect them, which can be a problem if the norm for that community is to make excuses for and enable poor behavior. Local boards often democratically hold to the maxim that the customer or voters are always right, even when they are not, which is to say that often lack the moral courage to lead. I guess they like their positions too much. In my state our governor as passed legislation to allow for the takeover the schools in these failed communities. I look forward to his sound leadership in this area, but to date the state is reluctant to take responsibility in communities where responsibility is sorely lacking. Here

          • dvdmsr

            One of the many problems with public schools is that the local boards of education often reflect the morals and values in the communities that elect them, which can be a problem if the norm for that community is to make excuses for and enable poor behavior. Local boards often democratically hold to the maxim that the customer or voters are always right, even when they are not, which is to say that often lack the moral courage to lead. I guess they like their positions too much. In my state our governor as passed legislation to allow for the takeover the schools in these failed communities. I look forward to his sound leadership in this area, but to date the state is reluctant to take responsibility in communities where responsibility is sorely lacking. Here

          • Ausonius

            According to what I could find, we are spending immense amounts on public education on the local, state, and federal levels combined.

            See:

            http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/breakdown

            K-12 expenditures are around $600 billion. In 2007 on average America was spending over $10,000 per student.

            The tuition at my suburban Ohio Catholic grade school is $4,000. To be fair, we do receive monies from the state for certain personnel, (e.g. a few of the counselors), and other services (e.g. public school busses do bring some students here.)

            We are accepting more students with problems than ever before, including so-called “learning disabled” and “problem students” with e.g. Asperger’s Syndrome or (one of my favorites) “Generalized Anxiety,” which must mean that the kid saw MAObama’s Budget Proposal! :)

            We have parents who are complete morons, whose kids are so messed up by inflated expectations, excuses, irresponsibility, chronic mendacity, etc. etc. etc. that we struggle to counter-balance the idiocy at home.

            What I do not have as a Catholic school teacher – and never need – are armies of bureaucrats sending me forms to fill out about how much chalk I have used, or second-guessing my curriculum, or telling me how to teach my subjects, or sending me scripts of what I should say in the classroom.

            I have taught occasionally in public schools throughout my nearly 40-year career. They were suburban high schools, where one might expect higher standards…but no. I was famously told 30 years ago by a Foreign Language Depratment Chairman that I had to stop demanding that homework be done from my German students. “They’ll just drop your course, and then you’ll be out of a job. You can only teach for about 15 minutes. The rest of the time is for them to do homework. You can’t have any kind of rigor here!”

            Which is a real re-definiton of “home”-work!

      • dvdmsr

        legal ability to exclude students and parents who have previously shown themselves to be irresponsible – or to boot those that come in and prove to be unmotivated or disruptive.

        • Repair_Man_Jack

          NT.

    • http://www.hakubi.us/ Neil Stevens

      Sheep accept whatever their servants in government choose to do.

      Free men demand results and hold public servants accountable.

      I choose to be a free man. Have fun being a sheep.

    • JSobieski

      Do you deny that in many problem school districts, the family structure is not so strong? (i.e. a child is lucky to have a responsible adult somewhere in their life—much less responsible parentS)

      Hundreds of thousands of people fleeing Detroit did nothing to fix anything, but it did create a heck of a problem.

      • goodolboy

        However, the idea that only $2500-$5000 out of $8500-$15000 will gut the school as the teachers unions say is a false argument because $6000-$10000 would be left behind without the requirement to teach a student who is not there and would mean the school is making money. As quill67 says, all the money should go with the child. The teachers unions have done more to ruin this country than anything else in history by turning out generations of uneducated children who in turn produced uneducated children who produced uneducated children all who become takers and not makers. Why send children to a school based on zip code when you don’t shop at a grocery store stocked by the government based on your zip code? Didn’t they do something like that in the old USSR?

        • jgelling

          In many states, school funding is provided primarily from local property taxes. If “money follows the child”, how does that work when students from poorer districts bring say, $4000 a year with them, and students from wealthier suburban district bring $10,000+?

          I just don’t understand how these plans work. Often, I see voucher plans and the amounts of money discussed are nowhere near what it costs to pay for private or charter schools. I just don’t see how you really revolutionize public education with free choice while keeping our very fractured public funding scheme intact.

        • acat

          More kids cost more, obviously. Special needs kids cost more, too. Sometimes, several orders of magnitude more. What do you do if they start leaving the district for charter or private schools?

          Mew

    • Adjoran

      Some are stuck where they are because of financial reasons, others by job requirements, others by the need to be near elderly parents or other family needs.

      To insist ANY function of government has an unalterable right to funding without showing responsibility or results is just STUPID.

      • dvdmsr

        They need our excuses – they are entitled to them.

        • JSobieski

          Reagan never talked about people in the way that you do.

          I like his approach better.

    • Dave_A

      There is nothing ‘conservative’ about forcing a family to go to a specific school based on a specific ZIP code.

      Why should the location of your home be the only thing you can choose?

      Moving is expensive – as is the cost of living in most neighborhoods with good public & private schools (although there are exceptions – good private schools found in not-so-good neighborhoods – which is why the Catholic Church does so well attracting non-Catholics to their school system).

      So why not let parents ‘vote with their feet’ on under-performing schools – even if they can’t afford to ‘vote with their feet’ on the place where their home is located? A voucher system takes the per-child expenditure for education and directs it to the school (public OR private) of the parent’s choice – thus breaking the tie between school funding and local property-tax, AND introducing market competition into the school system.

      In fact, personal choice & personal responsibility effectively ensure that the irresponsible and/or lazy parents who let their kids become holy-terrors will most likely NOT take the effort to get their kid into a good school in another neighborhood.

      It’s not about ‘culture’, it’s about parent involvement & school administration authority (both to deal with under-performing teachers, and misbehaving students)…

      Break the teacher’s unions & mega-districts.
      Eliminate residency-rules.
      Fund schools with state-issued vouchers instead of local tax.

      • dvdmsr

        what explains the different beliefs, values, and customs of parents when it comes to education, personal responsibility, and involvement in school?

        • Repair_Man_Jack

          If people are too lazy and self-centered to raise children properly, they will want to do all things possible to fob them off on the state.

  • skorrent1

    If he doesn’t want to zing the NEA too hard.

    “I refuse to believe that any teacher arrives at their schools…” Seems like his English teacher didn’t assign enough homework! Studies have consistantly shown that Ed Colleges enroll the dregs of the would-be professionals, and graduate the lowest performing of all graduates, by major. Obviously there are some (a few) outstanding and dedicated teachers, but the majority are not capable of instructing at a high, professional level, and are perfectly happy to fit into the dull routine of a one-size-fits-all institutional setting.

    The Kahn Academy concept of having video lectures delivered individually by outstanding, inspiring speakers offers hope. This turns the average classroom teacher into a mentor/toutor for individual problem solving which, at least for the lower grades, may be a better match for his capabilities.