« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Social scientists at UC Berkeley study the Tea Party

Do you ever feel like someone is watching you? Do you ever feel like someone is studying you and those you associate with from afar? Well guess what, you’re not paranoid it’s real. We’ve been under the microscope for two years now by Berkeley’s Center for the Comparative Study of Right-Wing Movements. And here you thought those cars driving around your neighborhood with the funny looking cameras on top were from Google.

Okay, I don’t have any proof that they are studying us cloak and dagger style but we are being studied nonetheless. Slate has the story, the subtitle of the article reads: “Lefty academics convene in Berkeley to try to make sense of the Tea Party movement.” To the academic elites at Berkeley we are like an alien species that just landed on Earth and they are naturally curious.

Put yourself in their shoes for a minute. Obama and the progressives in Congress gave us all these wonderful things like the Stimulus and Obamacare and Finance reform. They are also trying to save the planet with Cap and Tax. And how do we show our appreciation? We go to town halls and shout at them. No wonder they are confused and perplexed. This calls for some serious research, here are a couple of papers they are working on:

Prospects for an American Neofascism. Initially the project would consist of a review of recent research on American right wing groups (including the Tea Party movement, the Minutemen, and the Christian right); and of trends in national and transnational political economy that bear on our subject (such as cyclical and structural economic crises, corporate/government interpenetration, and the explosive growth of the military/industrial/security complex).

A Macro-Micro Model of Participation in Political Action: The Tea Party and Cognitive Biases in Information Consumption and Processing. Hypotheses were tested using qualitative data obtained from interviews with two groups: protest participants from various Tea Party protests (protesting group, N-15) and non-protesting Tea Party “supporters” (supporting group, N=3). Results show that strongly held pre-existing beliefs (particularly economic and political individualist ideology) heavily impacted levels of dissatisfaction with government policy and choices of information consumed.

Gee, I didn’t know I was a neofascist. I just thought I wanted a smaller less intrusive government based on our founding documents. On the second paper, I’ll admit I’m not as smart as these researchers but I think I know what “Cognitive Biases in Information Consumption and Processing” means. It’s just a fancy way of saying that I listen to Rush Limbaugh too much. I’ll have to plead guilty on that one.

The results of two years of study are in and the participants in this conference have found that the tea party is racist:

“There is that U.S. DNA that goes all the way back and does provide the conceptual source for this lynch mob mentality,” says Steve Martinot, who teaches at San Francisco State University. “And that is white supremacy. Shouldn’t we be looking at the Tea Party through that?”

Perlstein moves around the question. “The thing that makes America different, and this is a very dialectical, paradoxical concept, is that we have a lot of democracy,” he says. “The idea that everyone has an opinion of about what they’re hearing is both the glory and the tragedy of American democracy.”

But the social scientists are more ready than the historians to crunch numbers and prove that racial animosity is key to the Tea Party. It’s cold comfort for people like Hardy Frye, but it does suggest that Obama’s ability to form some grand populist coalition was always limited.

So, there you have it. According to the academics at this conference, “racial animosity is key to the Tea Party. And we have a ” lynch mob mentality.” And apparently it’s a “tragedy” that we have so much opinion in this country.

There is only one small flaw in their logic. If America is a boiling cauldron of racial animosity as they seem to imagine how did Obama become president when only 12.4% of the population is African-American? Is it possible that the sinking popularity of the President has something to do with his failing policies?

And by the way, do these academic types realize that Obama is not on the ticket in this upcoming election? Race has nothing to do with what is going to happen on November 2nd. And all those White Democratic Congressmen and Senators about to be unemployed know it.

COMMENTS

  • http://908StraightSt.wordpress.com/ mbecker908

    They don’t do science. At best they are aberrant statisticians.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    to understand even the smallest portion?

  • http://www.alyssakaeding.com Alyssa Kaeding

    And, yes. the Tea Party is being studied by the ruling class elites. I find it shocking that people in the ruling class cannot comprehend that the reason Obama’s numbers are plummeting are because his policies are anti-American, not because Americans are racists. Well, as The New York Times said last week, (paraphrasing) if President Obama cannot be great, then no modern president can be great….

  • 6eorge Jetson

    to $18k to cover my family. (It was $11k in 2008 w/ a different employer.)

    It was clear Obama was lying about the results of Obamacare, and most folks knew it. Even the AP is reporting the consequences.

    Could overhaul undermine employer health coverage?

    Those geniuses on the Left can’t figure out why Americans don’t want their lives made worse by the Ruling Class.

  • lukematthews

    We will need to record what has actually happened since the Petulant One’s ascension. We need to tell the whole story of how the American people stood up at Tea Parties, townhalls, through email and letter, through demonstration and organization and reversed the European socialization of this nation. We have to tell the tale of how the Ruling Class met its match in the hoi polloi of the body politic.

  • SteveLA

    My company’s annual benefits renewal is just around the corner, and I do wonder how much ObamaCare is going to cost me.

    I expect some increase as my now 21 year old son who is not in college is covered, something I hope is going to be continued in any new Republican bill, and my company merged with another bigger company. But still I expect my health insurance to go up $1K to $2K this year thanks to ObamaCare.

    Anyone else seen real increases in their company health care cost?,

  • acat

    Have to see what my company (and I mean that literally – self-employed = self-insured) will be shelling out next year.

    Mew

  • renny

    because the insurers have had the risk removed from their business and MUST cover all cases and all situations.

    If your adult children will be added to the policy, THEY WILL COST MORE.

    If all conditions will be “covered”, THEY WILL COST MORE.

    Insurance is based on RISK Ten people pay the same premium and the co. takes the risk that only one will get sick and the 10 premiums from everyone will pay out for the one illness. When ALL TEN are sick to start with, there is no risk and only payouts.

    In the end, no amount of raised premiums will cover everyone, and lo and behold, when the med. ins. industry is nil, YOU WILL HAVE A SINGLE PAYER SYSTEM: THE FED. GOV.

    And we don’t think little o is brilliant.

    Bork’em and vote the Rep. ticket all the way and REPEAL the Patriot Protection Act (Orwellian speech example in perfection) and start fresh with 1) competition for ins. across state lines, 2) dismantlement of state ins. reg. agencies, 3) serious tort reform, 4) portable ins. from place to place and job to job, 5) restructuring of Medicare and Medicaid to make both more financially sound, such as raising the age for Medicare as Soc. Sec.’s age requirement has been raised, use means testing if necessary, and even out state requirements for Medicaid so some states are not Medicaid havens.

  • SteveLA

    acat

    When my package shows up, mostly on the ‘net now which I don’t like, I will not be pleased. That much I am sure. I did the self insured paying for coverage myself back in 2000, not cheap ether and a bit hard to get.

    One aspect of insurance reform that I hope a R majority will tackle (no helmet to helmet) is the ability to buy insurance across state lines if the policies meet state guidelines.

  • reddog53

    This is a typical academic “center” composed of a couple of professors that devote most of their time to it (for $$, of course) and a bunch of ‘affiliated scholars’ that might know how to find the center’s office on campus….

    But the fascinating detail that jumps from their website is the donated collection of material from the People for the American Way. Apparently, Norman Lear’s folks were very, very busy!

    Personalize, Isolate and Attack your enemy….Saul would be proud of these students of his!

  • mikerazar

    but the one thing that all fascist regimes and their supporters agree on is tight central control by the State.

    All the central themes of the Tea Party movement involve decentralizing power. Is the tenth amendment a trick to add powers to the federal government? Does the Gadsen flag call for a strong leader making decisions for those of us incapable of thinking for ourselves?

    Have you ever heard these questions raised on a lame street media venue? Not even on Fox.

  • acat
  • JSobieski

    People have to get out of the one-size-fits-all model for health insurance. We don’t purchase homes that way. We don’t purchase cars that way. The most dynamic parts of the economy definitely don’t function that way.

    If you actually scrapped the state coverage requirements and limited regulations to (1) financial strength requirements (need to have cash reserves to sell policies) and (2) procedural safeguards (not substantive coverage requirements), people would actually have the ability to choose what they need and much of what they want for a very reasonable price. Through in high deductible plans with HSA accounts, and you have real reform.

    Some states have guidelines requiring all sorts of stupid stuff that just make health insurance more expensive. You think the government of California hasn’t instituted “guidelines” that cause price increases?

    Convert Medicare and Medicaid into voucher systems, combined with the remedies above, and markets would actually bring costs down.

  • izoneguy

    it will be cheaper to hire your own doctor…..
    If I could find one that would mow my yard, clean the house and cook the meals – that might be worth 100K…..
    I could convert a spare bedroom into a hospital/operating room.

    LOL

  • SteveLA

    30 Percent…YIKES….Does that come with your own dedicated set of Dr’s? LOL

  • izoneguy

    And it is a disaster. Now expand that disaster 5 fold and that is what America is in store for.

    The left talks of people dying in the street when the Republicans are in power…..

    Well people will be dying in the street if the socialists get their way.
    They could care less about the individual.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    Healthcare would actually be pretty cheap if there were very broad plans that covered only the catastrophic care that most people need,

    But plans were limited by state and so were limited in the size of their pools, then the states started mandating so many damn things to be covered that it drove the prices sky high.

    Just the way the liberals wanted it.

  • acat

    Not sure how competitive the marketplace is this year, but ..

    Mew