« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

A Conservative Call to Arms

I’m supporting Danny Tarkanian for the United States Senate in Nevada. He’s a great candidate. His opponent has a troubling record that might make her a Republican, but should give conservatives pause. — Erick

Fellow conservatives, it is time to issue a “Conservative Call to Arms” in Nevada.  It is still three months away, but the Nevada Republican primary is just as important as the primary in Florida.  It’s time for conservatives across America to pay close attention to the differences in this important race.

In Nevada, I am running against the establishment Republican candidate Sue Lowden.  Sue Lowden is one of Harry Reid’s earliest supporters and campaign contributors.  Even during this primary she still compares Harry Reid to Ronald Reagan – calling Harry Reid an early “Reagan Democrat.”

But her defense of Harry Reid doesn’t stop there.  In January, Sue Lowden stunned Republicans when she stated that she would have joined Harry Reid in voting for the Wall Street bailouts given the “panic” at the time.  Her explanation is that she was just agreeing with Senators like John McCain, but she doesn’t seem to understand that those taxpayer-funded bailouts launched the bailout mentality that seeks to socialize entire American industries including health care.

Not long after her bailout defense, the Las Vegas Review-Journal reported that as a Nevada State Senator, Sue Lowden voted for numerous tax and fee increases, including Nevada’s infamous ‘Job-killer Tax’ that taxed Nevada’s businesses $100 per year for every job they create.  Instead of admitting it was the wrong vote, today she defends this vote as “fairness” since her vote also ensured that small businesses would be included under the tax.  I ask, what is “fair” about taxing job creation under any circumstances?

On the issue of Life, the Las Vegas Sun reported in December that Sue Lowden was originally a strong supporter of Roe v. Wade, going so far as to support removing the pro-life plank from our National Republican platform in 1996.  Now, of course, she claims a change of heart.

Sue Lowden says she’s pro-Second Amendment, even though she supported Harry Reid’s election and first Senate term with three separate $1000 campaign contributions – while he voted for Justices Breyer, Souter and Ginsburg – thus providing three of the four “no” votes on the historic gun rights decisionDC v. Heller.  That first term, Harry Reid also voted against Justice Thomas, and more recently against Justices Alito and Roberts – taken together, he opposed three key votes in the Heller majority.  My guess is that very few would cast those same anti-Constitutionalist confirmation votes while calling themselves “Second Amendment supporters.”’

Sue Lowden isn’t just one of Harry Reid’s earliest supporters. On the issues, she is aligned with Harry Reid on the Wall Street bailouts and tax increases. Like Harry Reid, she has also argued that Nevada needs more pork, not less. Sue Lowden has financially supported Harry Reid and his anti-Constitutionalist judicial votes, and she sought to remove the abortion plank from the Republican platform. Voters in Nevada are starting to understand why the Nevada Republican primary is as important as the general election.

Sue Lowden’s one main asset isn’t on the issues – it is access to campaign cash.  As Chairman of the Nevada Gaming Commission, it was Harry Reid who provided the unique privilege of a Nevada gaming license, and she is using the wealth she has accumulated since to try to buy this race with an early barrage of television advertisements.  She refuses to debate for the benefit of voters – a true measure of establishment candidate arrogance.  This is troubling.

What is most troubling, however, is the idea that we might replace Harry Reid with one of his earliest supporters or any defender of the Wall Street bailouts for that matter.  And that is why I am issuing this conservative “call to arms.”

To be fair, there is another true conservative in this race, and I have great regard for the passion and intensity of Sharron Angle.  If I weren’t running, she would have my support.    But I am running the strongest conservative campaign, and I am resoundingly beating Harry Reid in every poll taken – some by double-digits.  I am clearly conservatives’ best chance to make sure that neither Harry Reid – nor any other defender of the bailouts – will represent Nevada in the U.S. Senate.

It is early, and there is plenty of time to make sure that a real conservative beats Harry Reid in Nevada.  So let’s make clear the differences.

Unlike Sue Lowden, I oppose all bailouts, regardless of any so-called “panic.”  I am the one candidate who understands that this administration will use crises at every turn for ideological gain.

On fiscal matters such as taxes, I have signed the no-tax pledge, and unlike Sue Lowden, who broke it repeatedly as a State Senator, I will honor it under all pressures from my own party, whose record on fiscal issues is in urgent need of rehabilitation.  On pork, I support a complete ban on earmarks, while Sue Lowden voted for pork as a State Senator, argues for more pork, and said she will only support a ban if all other Senators agree.

On Life, I have always supported the inalienable human rights of the unborn, and I believe that plank is the heart of our party platform.  It is a line in the sand – its own ‘call to arms’ that we are a party with principles, beginning with that most basic of principles – protection of innocent life.

Furthermore, I understand and have written about the imperative to reject judges who oppose our Second Amendment rights to own, possess and to defend ourselves with firearms.   The fact is that the government doesn’t grant us those freedoms.   The right of the people to defend their Life and Liberty against aggression and tyranny is a God-given right – which they may defend at the point of a gun, if necessary.  No exceptions.

Like many of you, I am disappointed in our Republican party for losing its way.  However, I stay in this party because I know in the end the party is you – the conservatives.  And I am proud to be counted among you – fighting back for the heart and soul of our party.

When I played basketball, I always believed in leadership and teamwork.  But when the team loses focus, leaders need to step up and speak their mind.  So I say it’s time to get back to a Constitutional view of our federal government’s responsibilities.  It is time to lead our country out of the wilderness-to fight the lazy conventional wisdom of the establishment, whose inertia threatens to pull our country off a cliff.

If I just wanted to beat Harry Reid, I’d be content with becoming a U.S. Senator.  But that’s not my goal.  Beating Harry Reid is but one step along the way towards turning our nation around using the Constitution as our beacon.  That long journey must begin in this primary, and continue long after the defeat of Mr. Reid. If I am Nevada’s next U.S. Senator, I will wake up every day with the same intensity I brought to the basketball court, determined to bring back a Constitutional vision and direction for this great nation.

G.K. Chesterton once spoke of the ‘eternal rebel’ at the heart of every conservative.  He was right.  Liberty is at the core of our philosophy, but it is a revolutionary concept in this day, and as conservatives, we are the ones who can truly inspire change and yes – revolution. If you are with me, stand with me be counted.  Join me now at TARK2010.org.

Thank you.

Danny Tarkanian

COMMENTS

  • NeoKong

    With bells on.
    My checkbook is ready.
    Let’s send her to Coakley Town.

    • KathW

      For me your strongest arguments against Sue are her establishment money as a casino owner and her horrible willingness to accept earmarks. You’ve got a tire iron under her on the pork issue and you should leverage for all you’re worth.

    • turningred

      I can

      • giantsprincess

        Slow down and go to Danny’s website (www.tark2010.org) and read his position on gun rights. He is a lifetime member of the NRA and is being endorsed by Charles (Chuck) Heath – aka Sarah Palin’s dad. Do you think the Heath/Palin family would support Danny if he was anti-guns? The Brady endorsement – when you know the whole story – is a non-story. Don’t buy into Sue Lowden’s garbage.

        When Danny was running for Secretary of State there was a volunteer helping his campaign by the name of Dan Burdish. For whatever reason, Burdish contacted the Brady people – on his own – and asked for an endorsement. He handled everything and the campaign didn’t know until after the call had been released that it was done. Burdish has since admitted that Danny knew NOTHING about this request – if he had he would have put an immediate stop to it. Oh yeah – Dan Burdish is now a PAID member of Sue Lowden’s campaign. I believe he is her political director.

        So, when you connect the dots the story becomes clearer. I am so sure of Danny’s position on this issue that I am working with his campaign and support him 100%.

        • turningred

          First of all you admit you are working on Dannys campaign so it is obvious that you are one sided and you are also full of garbage and Danny can write all the garbage he wants on his own website because its meaningless and he has no real record to prove otherwise. I work on nobodys campaign but I have stated fact and provided the links and the fact is Danny got the Brady Endorsement and the fact is Brady Campaign made thousands of phone calls on behalf of Dannys campaign and the Brady Campaign never endorses a Republican over a Democrat without knowing all the facts and Danny has never denied it but if Danny wants to pretend that he was stupid enough to not know what everybody else in his campaign knew then Danny has no business being a US Senator. Its also a fact that Danny contributes his own money to elect other gun haters. Another fact to remember is the NRA graded Danny with an F for a reason and who cares about a membership that Danny bought because anybody including a liberal like John Kerry can buy a membership to the NRA so it really proves nothing and even Harry Reid scored a better grade from the NRA than Danny did. Also the Palin family is not endorsing Danny. Chuck Heath is a basketball fan who lives in Alaska and knows nothing about Danny except that some man name Jerry Tarkanian was a coach and since the story broke that Danny was anti-gun I noticed that Chuck has stayed away. Hey believe what you want to believe because it won

  • Castor

    My research coincides with the above. There is a good reason not to split the vote between Tarkanian and Angle on primary day which would allow the opportunistic Lowden to slip in.
    Since Danny Tarkanian has the best chance according to all of the polls,Sharron Angle can best be advised to wait for a future shot.(possibly replacing the disgraced John Ensign?)
    In order to conform to Red State

    • mjs_pa

      Sorry Danny, I’d love to donate to your campaign but according to Erick I’m too extreme.

      I’ll say a prayer though. I know that won’t pay the bills, but you know, Erick gets to set the rules.

      • Vegas_Rick

        Do you want a little cheese with that whine? My 10- year old niece comes off more mature.

        If you have a beef with Erick, why not try to show some moxie and discuss it with him via the contact form.

        Sheeesh!

        • Vegas_Rick

          I’m giving what I can and I’ll be sportin’ some stickers and signs, and with what little time I have free, I’ll be on the phones!

          Git ‘er one!

      • roscopico

        Did Erick mean too extreme in your propensity to be childish and vindictive? If this is not the case, then I assume this means you believe the birfer crap?

        Whatever it is, I can assure you , I don’t care enough to learn the source of your tantrum. Seems likely to me the problem is entirely between your ears. If you don’t wish to support Mr. Tarkanian financially, Fine. But do shut up.

        And to Mr. Tarkanian: I wish you the best of luck, and I’ll support you in the primary as well as the general.

        • turningred

          I can

          • http://thefloridaprecinctproject.wordpress.com/ precinctpatriot

            on why he is getting support from the Brady gun control group. What is his position on Government limits on controlling our ability to “keep and bear arms”?

          • giantsprincess

            Danny is NOT being endorsed by the Brady group. See my message on this board which explains the whole situation.

          • turningred

            Not only did the Brady Gun Control Group endorsed Danny, the NRA also scored Danny a big fat F! Even Harry Reid got a better grade.

            The truth is here>

            http://media.washingtontimes.com/media/docs/2009/Dec/16/Nevada_Tarkanian.pdf

            http://media.washingtontimes.com/media/audio/2009/12/17/brady.mp3

        • newnoni

          I agree Sue Lowden is not the candidate to get behind but I also will not get behind Danny Tarkanian. He is not the conservative he makes himself out to be. He can talk the good talk but like it has been stated he has donated to a democrate gun-hating liberal. He was endorsed by the Brady campaign (another gun-hating group) when he ran for Secretary of State. He has no record for us to check to see if he ever kept his word. My money is on Sharron Angle. She has a very conservative record and that’s what she is running on. The only reason Lowden is getting any traction is her money. She has put a lot of her own money into the campaign. The only reason Danny Tarkanian is getting traction is because of the name “Tarkanian.” This is the primary. This is where we can pick the best candidate. Check them all out and get behind the one who will truly represent us in the Senate.

          • giantsprincess

            See my other commebnts regarding Danny and the Brady Bill mess. . .

          • turningred

            haha you are right it is a mess and its a mess you cant clean up. Tarkanian has no record except for giving money to gun haters and getting the Brady Gun Control Group Endorsement.

      • http://thatssaulfolks.com saul_anuzis

        http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2010/03/lowden_leads_bu.php

        Sue Lowden lead expands in the primary and leads in the primary.

        • giantsprincess

          Sue Lowden’s lead has increased due to one thing – she has the money behind her to run TV ads this early in the process. Unfortunately, the money she is using is on the backs of the 106 LAID OFF employees of her company.

          Lowden and her husband laid off 106 employees of their company – while her hubby took a salary of $550,000 and a bonus of $200,000. Their company also stopped its 25% match of employee contributions to their 401(k) program.

          Danny is running a grass roots campaign and is the only REAL CONSERVATIVE in this race. Sharron Angle has nothing to offer except personal digs (I experienced that first-hand while speaking to her) – she wouldn’t talk issues but instead said that Amodei was “not a real candidate” and “lazy”. . she made fun of Sue’s beauty queen/TV past. Nothing on the issues.

          • turningred

            Wow giant princess you are a real RINO not only do you work for Danny Tarkanian but you also defend a tax and spend giant like Mark Amodey. You certainly show your true colors. You should give up while you can but please try to provide us just one actual FACT that Danny Tarkainian is a REAL CONSERVATIVE as you claim. What exactly has the basketball dribbler done in his whole life that proves he is a REAL CONSERVATIVE other than the garbage that Danny makes up on his own website? Please show us some real proof.

  • becolt

    Well put enough to make me google the hell out of you before deciding on support :) but if your words are any indication, google research won’t be a hindrance.