« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Portman Would Be Poor Choice for VP

Vladimir Lenin once said that a lie told often enough becomes the truth.  I’ve come to believe there are some soundbites from the 2008 election that were regurgitated so many times they’ll forever be accepted as truths no matter their inherent falsehood.  How many times did we hear “…a return to the failed Bush economic policies” when Obama was slinging mud at John McCain?  That line has been said so many times by Barack Obama that I’ll never be able to evict it from my mind.

Who will Mitt Romney choose for his running mate?  Will he choose the Senator from Ohio, Rob Portman?  I certainly hope not.  We do not need the former Director of Management and Budget for George W. Bush on the ticket.  If Mitt chooses him then my hope for a GOP win this November really takes a nose dive.  Over and over we will hear Barack Obama harping on Romney choosing George W. Bush’s former budget director and how he’d (Obama) never again to steer the US toward “…a return to the failed Bush economic policies”.  He may well be the most qualified man for the job; he may be more qualified than Romney himself.  I don’t care.  He’s closely tied to George W. Bush’s “compassionate conservative” EXPLOSION in federal spending and he elicits no enthusiasm from me.  Mitt needs an individual who will generate some excitement.

The smartest choice for his running mate is Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin.  Our nation is headed off of a fiscal cliff.  We are assuredly galloping down to the road to serfdom at an unbelievable rate.  In his capacity as House Committee Budget Chairman, Paul Ryan knows what must be done to stop our national decay.  He is incredibly sharp and a true conservative.  Plus, let’s face it, the fellow was blessed with good looks and hair comparable only to Reagan.  This never hurts a campaign ticket.

I’ve stated who I want Romney to choose, but there are some other men out there who I be comfortable having as our leader.  Certainly Lt. Col. Allen West of Florida has moral fiber any man or woman could admire.  He has the right convictions and would energize the conservative base.  Bobby Jindal makes the list, too.  I’m not as excited about him as Ryan or West.  I do believe a woman could hold the #2 spot.  At present I think a woman could hold the #1 spot.  However, America does not have her Thatcher yet.  She will come along someday.

Christie is a firebrand, but New Jersey needs him more than we do right now.  He needs to be out in the spotlight, not tucked away as often happens to the vice president.  I think Bob McDonnell would have been my first choice, but his advocacy of drones spying on US citizens and requiring women to have an ultrasound before having an abortion is not in my comfort zone.  We need to denude the government of as much power as possible.

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • http://nextgenerationvoters.com Bethany

    Either of them would be perfect in my opinion. Paul Ryan is my third choice– I think his policies are a great start in the right direction. I just prefer the first two.

    • westcoastpatriette

      only my third choice would be Bobby Jindal.

      • mikeymike143

        great minds think alike. :)

  • retrocon87

    solid-enough conservative creds, two-term governor of a blue state, zero ties to bush, comes off well, not over-powering so would be a good #2, does good interviews… perfect for romney.

    • Tbone

      of his nose to tell if he is still alive.

      Romney picks him and he gains no votes.

    • darrenperkins

      There is a strong chance that you may be correct on Pawlenty.

    • littlehouse18

      He came off as petty. I think he will at best do nothing for the ticket.

      • Xasteius

        I’d like to see Jindal as VP. Ryan should stay in the House.

  • bbjaylive

    So you slam Portman for being tied to Bush and being easy prey for Obama to feast on, and then you go and choose EVEN BIGGER prey in Paul Ryan? Where is the logic in your argument? Did you not hear what Obama called his budget? Something about Social Darwinism?

    I’m sorry but I cannot take this diary seriously when you say the above and then mention Allen West (aka. bomb-thrower). The media would take him to the woodshed. It would be Herman Cain ALL OVER AGAIN.

  • JSobieski

    Then he might as well have someone capable of defending it. Besides Ryan is not tied to Bush

  • darrenperkins

    Many news articles have been published confirming that apart from endorsing the Ryan plan, Romney has also met with the Wisconsin House member who confirms having thoroughly discussed how his plan works. Last month a top Ryan aide jumped to the Romney campaign as well.

  • bbjaylive

    At least according to Darren, Obama would be able to say the same thing about both of these guys, i.e.:

    “Do we really want to go back to the policies that got us in this mess?”

  • darrenperkins

    bbjaylive, I will concede that there is merit in what you are saying. I am DEEPLY troubled by Ryan’s vote for TARP, Medicare Part D, the automobile bailouts, and in favor of the Obama stimulus.

  • JSobieski

    Who has shown more guts and grace on that issue?

  • darrenperkins

    A “NAY” vote on the $1 trillion stimulus. My mistake.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    I’ll let Congressman Ryan defend it – David Gregory is a lot better debater than either Barack Obama or Joe Biden – Gregory tried to beat him over the head with mediscare, and class warefare. Basically, no affect for anyone 55 or older; means testing for people more than one generation from retirement; willing to negotiate, this is his best effort; doesn’t see how

  • bbjaylive

    Fact of the matter is, Obama and his minions will be looking to use this as a political hammer and therefore according to Darren’s logic, since Portman can be tied to bush, Romney will be tied to Ryan’s budget plan.

  • tnfriendofcoal101368

    without ever having the debate. To finish.

  • JSobieski

    And you are wasting your time. . . And ours.

  • littlehouse18

    The main arguments they’ll have against Ryan relate to his plan. Ryan will be more than capable of deftly refuting them in debate. Maybe he can finally get enough people to see the truth and make a dent in the ignorance Americans show on the issues. He exudes competence, knowledge, and honesty. And he’s unflappable like Reagan – I’ve never seen him get flustered, bitter, or defensive.

    I believe Ryan will be the best choice and will gain us votes. As VP he’d also be a great liaison with Congress. Even most Dems like him personally.