I’ve listened to quite a bit of Obama’s Berlin speech (some parts of it over and over), and I’m going to flat out disagree with the media and pundits claiming that he is a great orator. I do a fair bit of speaking in front of the public, and have been a fan of some of the better speeches over the years. If this is an example of Obama’s best effort, it is pretty bad.
Look, a great speech needs to have three things going for it. It needs to have a strong theme, it needs a coherent structure, and it needs good delivery. The Berlin speech had only one of them, delivery. I literally found myself zoning out listening to the words, because they were just a jumble of random thoughts delivered with a nice cadence. The phenomena of Obamamanics may be due to literal hyponosis.
When you have listened to a great speech, you can sum up the entire experience into a single sound bite that delivered the theme of the speech in a single line punctuating the message. It is what the people leave with as the message in their hearts. Look at examples from the past:
Lincoln: “these dead shall not have died in vain; that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom; and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.”
Roosevelt: “December 7th, 1946, a day that will live in infamy”
Kennedy: “My fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country. My fellow citizens of the world, ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man.”
Churchill: “We will never surrender”
King: “I have dream this afternoon that the brotherhood of man will become a reality this day”
Reagan: “Mr. Gorbachov, tear down this wall!”
Other than “I am a citizen of the world” and “This is our moment”, where is the structure and driving theme from Obama’s speech? I can’t find it, I don’t think it exists. The only theme I take from the speech is that this is the world’s “moment” to deify him. As a speech, it really sucked.
Jeff Emanuel
Neil Stevens
Caleb Howe
Daniel Horowitz
I stopped listening to Obama's speeches.
Mord (Diary) Saturday, July 26th at 11:11AM EDT (link)I realized I don’t even know what he is actually saying when I listen to him talk. Like you say..I just zone out and it’s hard to actually pay attention to what he is saying. This might be why he has been so successful, you think? When I read a transcript, what he actually said doesn’t really make sense. When he is off-script and “uh-uh-uh” comes out, it ruins the effect and lets you see he really isn’t that eloquent. I believe he stutters so much because it’s hard to come up with things that a politician SHOULD say when they are at odds with what they actually BELIEVE. Has anyone noticed that he CONSTANTLY looks far-left and far-right, like he is addresing a huge crowd, even when he talks to just a couple of reporters?
————————————–
“Republicans never win polls, they win elections,” – Rudy Giuliani
————————————–
I felt the same way about
Mark Kilmer (Diary) Saturday, July 26th at 11:27AM EDT (link)Romney’s “religion speech,” but it was not nearly as vacuous as an Obamily.
I don’t watch anymore, either.
Read
RJD (Diary) Saturday, July 26th at 12:59PM EDT (link)Obama’s speeches. There’s nothing there. No substance. The man could read the phone book and make it sound like the greatest speech ever. That’s his only gift and why he is the figurehead of the Obama Cult of Personality.
I’ve written this before, but President Bush has the opposite problem. He has poor delivery for generally great speeches. Read those speeches and you find substance, passion and usually a memorable line or two.
The best part
ThreeNineNine Saturday, July 26th at 2:08PM EDT (link)was when he said “Will we lift the child in Bangladesh from poverty…”
Which McCain already did 17 years ago.
Honestly though, I listened to some of it. The beginning was really good, but the rest of it was just like all his other speeches, which like y’all, I completely zoned out through.