« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Just a Few Things to Think About…

By: davenj1 (Diary)  |  March 18th, 2012 at 08:12 AM  | 

RESIZE: AAA

1. Why do liberals refer to “social justice” or “economic justice?” Shouldn’t it simply be “justice?”

2. If global warming is shrinking the polar bear population due to loss of habitat, why has their population increased from 5,000 to 25,000 over the last 50 years?

3. Why is Obama our “first black President” if his mother was white? Wouldn’t he be our first “half black President?” Are we to just forget his mother? And if so, isn’t that kind of sexist?

4. If liberals like to call themselves progressives, why are their solutions to problems so oppressive?

5. Why do Moslem women have more rights in Israel than they do in Arab/Moslem countries?

Tags: ,

COMMENTS

POSTING RULES  |  LOGIN TO COMMENT  |  REGISTER TODAY
  • Viet71

    BTW, don’t look too closely at Obama’s lineage or upbringing. Not PC.

  • lastgopinillinois

    “social justice” in reference to some alleged discrimination, and
    “economic justice” in reference to poverty.

    By itself, the term “justice” is in reference to conforming with the law, but the two buzz phrases above are meant to conjure feelings of UNFAIRNESS.

    You’d probably be apt to hear these phrases used within OWS crowds (another leftist invention). So we have an invented group using their invented phrases to vent hate and vile against those whom they BELIEVE are responsible for their victimhood. They’re too stupid to realize that they are angry at the wrong people. It is actually democrat government policies that they should be angry with.

    A private company would hire the most qualified person for the job regardless of race, creed, etc without affirmative action. It is affirmative action that has CREATED the notion of discrimination.

    If government beaurocracies were cleared away for the private sector to grow the market, there would be more jobs and less poverty.

    The whole idea behind a limited government is to enable individuals to use what they have to learn and become useful in society on their own merits. If people fall short (or have loftier goals), it gives them an INCENTIVE to adjust their strategy or further their education so they can improve their lives on their own and take pride in what they have accomplished.

    They dont understand that their beloved nanny-state and their beloved food-stamp President 0bama is at the root of their problems, NOT the CEO who worked his tail off, sacrificed, took a risk, and made a fortune.

    If they want what he has, they should do what he DID !!!