<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will Supreme Court Hear Guantanamo Cases?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/davenj1/2012/06/07/will-supreme-court-hear-guantanamo-cases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/davenj1/2012/06/07/will-supreme-court-hear-guantanamo-cases/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 23:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave_A</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/davenj1/2012/06/07/will-supreme-court-hear-guantanamo-cases/#comment-1314</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave_A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 03:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/davenj1/?p=1361#comment-1314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They should be tried in military court as per international law dealing with unlawful combatants.

Similarly, there should not be a requirement for &#039;evidence&#039; to hold someone captured on the battlefield - they should be considered Enemy Prisoners of War and held for the duration of the conflict (eg, indefinitely)...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should be tried in military court as per international law dealing with unlawful combatants.</p>
<p>Similarly, there should not be a requirement for &#8216;evidence&#8217; to hold someone captured on the battlefield &#8211; they should be considered Enemy Prisoners of War and held for the duration of the conflict (eg, indefinitely)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
