« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Electoral Projections: The Senate

In a previous article, I described the methodology used for the Presidential election. Unfortunately, applying that system to Senate and House races is futile. For the Senate, since there are two per state, it is difficult to get an accurate view of long and short term electoral trends even when one looks at the actual seat in play. Obviously, with House elections, redistricting every ten years totally upsets the apple cart. Because House elections are a guarantee every two years, to obtain a long-term trend, one would have to go even further back in time. Additionally, the down-ticket effect in Presidential election years that coincide with Senate and/or House elections is important and would have to be controlled for in any analysis.

First, in the Senate, let us dispense with the obvious outcomes. For the Democrats, the winners will be Diane Feinstein (CA), Ben Cardin (MD), Bernie Sanders (VT), Tom Carper (DE), Amy Klobuchar (MN) and Sheldon Whitehouse (RI). For the GOP, it will be Roger Wicker (MS), Tom Barrrasso (WY), Bob Corker (TN) and Orrin Hatch (UT). Some here have expressed a willingness to dispense with Corker and/or Hatch. Hatch is out of the way and conservatives will have to wait six years to get rid of him. Corker in Tennessee is another question as they have not had their primary yet.

In the other races, moving west to east, it is likely that the race for an open Democratic seat in Hawaii will be between former GOP Governor Linda Lingle and Rep. Mazie Hirono for the Democrats with Hirono the winner. Likewise, although I believe the race will be closer than polls currently indicate, Maria Cantwell should keep the seat in Washington in Democratic hands. Assuming a Flake-Carmona match up for the open Republican seat of John Kyl in Arizona, look for Jeff Flake to win keeping it in GOP hands. In Nevada, Dean Heller will face Shelley Berkeley and, at this point, I see a 6-point victory for Heller. An interesting race to watch will be in New Mexico where John Bingaman’s Democratic seat is up for grabs. With Heather Wilson the GOP candidate, she is probably the best bet for the party and will face Martin Heinrich. Although polls indicate a Heinrich victory, this race should be very closely watched and if Wilson prevails, it could be the biggest Senate upset of the night.

There is only one poll out of North Dakota thus far and it shows Heitkamp (a Democrat) with a one point lead over Rick Berg for Byron Dorgan’s open Democratic seat. That will definitely change and should be a lesson against using “the most recent poll” method in projecting winners. This is a GOP pick-up in the Senate. In Nebraska, Debra Fischer is running for the GOP after outlasting a crowded field in the primary. She will run against former Senator Bob Kerrey for Ben Nelson’s open seat. Even before the primary, Fischer (indeed, every Republican) led Kerrey and that trend holds true after the primary. Hence, Nebraska is a second Republican pick-up in the Senate. And although candidates for both parties will be determined after a run-off, whoever replaces Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX) will be a Republican.

Missouri has yet to have their primary to determine who will take on the very vulnerable Democratic incumbent Claire McCaskill. Polls show that any of the three GOP possibilities- Steelman, Akin, or Brunner- would defeat McCaskill, which is not good news for McCaskill. Should she prevail, it will be by the skin of her teeth. Assuming the GOP candidate does not shoot themselves in the foot- never a given- it looks like yet another GOP pick-up (running count- +3 seats). In Montana, incumbent Democrat John Tester will face a tough challenge to keep his seat also. These two states- Missouri and Montana- are where the down-ticket effect comes into play. Assuming both will break for Romney, and given the polls thus far, I would look for a Republican pick-up in Montana also. Hence, our running count is a net 4 seat pick-up for Republicans.

In Michigan, although showing signs of slipping slightly, miscues by GOP candidate Pete Hoekstra still has Debbie Stabenow headed for reelection. For Herb Kohl’s open Democratic seat in Wisconsin, there is one certainty- the Democratic candidate will be Tammy Baldwin. Against either Thompson or Neumann for the GOP, there has been a fairly consistent trend- Thompson would be a shoo-in while Neumann would be a nail-biter. With the future so important, let us not repeat the mistakes of Delaware/Colorado in 2010 and go with an almost-sure thing. If Thompson, then the GOP takes this seat, hence a 5-seat pick-up.

In Ohio, Republican Josh Mandel will face off against Democratic incumbent Sherrod Brown, probably one of the most consistently liberal voices in the Senate. At first glance, given Brown’s liberalism and Mandel’s thin resume and questionable background, this creates a weird race. Unfortunately, unless something changes, I do not believe the down-ticket effect will benefit Mandel. Thus, I would keep a close eye on this race, but have to give it to Brown at this point. In Indiana, having dispensed with Dick Lugar in the primary thus creating an open Republican seat, the only poll shows a tie between Richard Mourdock and Joe Donnelly with an almost equal number undecided. Personally, given the post-primary approach of Mourdock, I cannot see this seat falling into Democratic hands, thus a Mourdock victory.

In Pennsylvania, Democratic incumbent Bob Casey will win reelection. And despite dismal approval ratings in his home state, in neighboring New Jersey Democrat Bob Menendez will win reelection. I may have told this story before about my home state Senator during the Obamacare debate. I had sent e-mails to both Lindsey Graham (R-SC) based on a floor speech, and to Menendez. Although it was not Graham’s policy to reply to non-constituents, he nevertheless did. Menendez’ reply was a plea for a campaign contribution. Needless to say, I would rather vote for Willy the Wonder Donkey rather than Robert Menendez.

In New York, it would appear that Democrat Kirsten Gillibrand will win reelection. In Maine, Olympia Snowe’s surprise retirement creates an open Republican seat. It appears that an independent will win this seat. And there is no mistake that Snowe’s decision- despite her reasoning- has hurt the GOP in the Senate. Thus far, there is no doubt as to who they will caucus with in January. Saying you will vote for Obama over Romney is a big “duh!” The premiere race out of New England will be in Massachusetts where Republican incumbent Scott Brown faces uber-liberal Elizabeth Warren. Whatever the outcome, it will be very close. However, I feel that Brown has positioned himself sufficiently as a moderate while Warren’s miscues and brand of liberalism maybe just too much even for Massachusetts. Then again, this is the land of Ted Kennedy and Barney Frank and John Kerry. At this point, I would call this race for Brown. The final race out of the Northeast is in Connecticut where Joe Lieberman’s seat is up for grabs (technically a Democratic seat). Unlike the GOP, if the Democrats choose Susan Bysiewicz as their candidate, they place the seat at risk. If not, no matter who runs for the GOP- Linda McMahon (again) or Chris Shays- this seat stays in Democratic hands. Thus coming out of the Northeast, the GOP loses one seat (thanks, Snowe!) for a net gain of four seats thus far.

The final two races are in Florida and Virginia. In Florida, initially the Republicans thought they finally had their candidate in Rep. Connie Mack. However, incumbent Democrat Bill Nelson has shown a rather consistent lead in the polls since the beginning of the year. I would not count on a GOP pick-up here just yet. Finally, in Virginia- one of the most polled states for the Senate- it has been back and forth between Democrat Tim Kaine and Republican George Allen for an open Democratic seat. I have no doubt that the final result will be razor thin, although there are a lot of undecided votes in practically every poll conducted. Here, the down-ticket effect may play a major role in the Senatorial outcome. Additionally, the role played by Gov. Bob McDonnell in delivering Virginia for both Romney and Allen will be an important factor. Based on the average of all the polls, at this point, I would give the race to Allen. Hence, the GOP should pick up a net 5 seats in the Senate and control of that chamber.

I do have one major suggestion when and if this happens. Although Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell has done a deft job as Minority Leader in certain aspects, I personally do not believe, given the challenges facing this nation, he is the right man for Majority Leader. Making that transition to Majority Leader is not a given. Hence, come January, McConnell should be thanked for his service and eased out of his leadership position. There are certainly “better” candidates- John Cornyn (TX), James Inhofe (OK) or even Jim DeMint (SC)- who can better represent core conservative values.

COMMENTS

  • APA Guy

    I don’t give a rip about “experience”. I swear, if someone lauds experience or holds it over the head of our young warriors in congress one more time, I’ll explode.

    What we need is strong, principled leadership at the helm of congress…even if Mitt Romney is elected. I have long since tired of the establishment’s lip service in dealing with the issues of our time.

    • mikeymike143

      and i was curious if you know my tea party friend monica boyer of hooisers for a conservative senate. she was one of the leaders in the fight to oust richard lugar and replace him with conservative richard mourdock. and i know you were pretty active on that front too.

      as far my choice for as senate majority leader, let’s go for all the marbles. jim demint. its a pretty safe bet he wont fold under political pressure. and his record of standing up for conservative values is beyond reproach.

      • APA Guy

        If memory serves, she is from the Warsaw area…just minutes from my hometown. My territory covered the Indy suburbs and ran north just shy of Kosciusko County.

        Tell her your RedState amigo, APA Guy, is a college professor among a dwindling number of liberal instructors here in Indiana. That ought to make her day :)

    • davenj1

      Principle over experience at this position. Absolutely.

  • APA Guy

    nt

  • http://www.flaliberty.org scorpio0679

    I would love it if we got to 60. Is it possible? Honestly, this COULD be a huge landslide defeat, Obama’s victory four years ago was totally based on massive enthusiastic turnout, which is NOT going to happen this time around.

  • http://boldcolor.blogspot.com/ Paula

    “At first glance, given Brown

    • davenj1

      About Mandel. Yes, his resume is thin and just because you do two tours in Iraq is not a free ride into the US Senate. Can you explain why the Mandel family has donated to every liberal Democrat in Ohio and elsewhere? Can you explain why Mandel was an apparent supporter of Al Gore in 2000? Hey- I would like to see Sherrod Brown flushed down the political toilet, but please don’t say that Mandel is the best and brightest to do so in Ohio.

    • davenj1

      After pledging to serve a 4-year term, why did he announce his Senate candidacy three months into that term?
      Running against a law against discrimination against gays in housing, why when Mandel was in college as President of the Undergraduate Student Government did he fight for housing for same-sex couples at OSU?
      Why has the Mandel family donated to Bill Richardson, Ted Strickland, Frank Lautenberg, Allyson Schwartz- all Democrats and all liberal- and others?
      When James Ratner, through Forest City, donated $1.5 million to ACORN to help Brown get elected, why was the Mandel family also targeted by ACORN?
      Why did Albert Ratner donate $17,000 to Mandel in 2008?

      I am not trying to tear him down because all these facts are out there. My main question is: when did Mandel have his great conservative epiphany?

      • http://boldcolor.blogspot.com/ Paula

        Sheesh! You’re repeating all the talking points of Plunderbund, Ohio’s version of Media Matters. What’s your deal?

        OK, let’s think this through.

        First, I was a liberal in college. I spent most of my time completely plastered and am not sure who I even voted for in those hazy years. I suspect that a lot of others here at RedState have similar stories. If that’s the criteria by which we are going to judge our candidates, we’re in big trouble. For my personal story, I became a Christian and God changed me almost overnight. Among other things, I went from agnostic on abortion to strongly prolife almost instantly. Over a period of a year I became a conservative and voted accordingly. It happens to people for a variety of reasons. Otherwise we wouldn’t bother with campaigns.

        I also come from a family of liberal Democrats. Die hard union people. On Mother’s Day my dad told me he thought Castro had it right and thought all guns should be banned. Fortunately, he doesn’t have millions of dollars to donate to his causes. Everyone in my family is liberal. They all think I’m nuts. Does that cause you to question my conservative credibility? If so, you are the one with the problem.. We live in a constitutional republic and our founding fathers rejected the idea of a nobility that passes its titles down through the generations.

        For the record, Mandel is Jewish, traditionally a group that votes Democrat. Exactly what do you think his motivation might be to switch to the GOP, run for a dozen years on a conservative platform, and compile an extensive, consistent conservative voting record in the state legislature? Do you think he’s scamming the GOP and he’s going to suddenly “come out’ as a Democrat once elected to the senate? Because I think it would have been a heck of a lot easier for him to go along with his family and just be a Dem from the beginning. He won elections in a Dem city and a Dem district. Why would he do that if he were a secret liberal?

        You really need to stop reading Plunderbund’s conspiracy theories. They’re certainly not appropriate here.

        • davenj1

          After over 200 diary entries here on RedState, you have outed me as a “troll.” I believe I was a vocal supporter of someone infinitely better than Josh Mandel very early on- Ken Blackwell. Would me being a supporter of Blackwell qualify me as a troll also in your mindset?

          Second, what the hell is plunderbund? Until you mentioned it, I had never heard of it before, so strike 2.

          Third, you haven’t answered the criticisms I cited other than to say they part of some vast conspiracy by some Plunderbund something or other. Strike 3.

          Winning elections in a Democratic city and district by running on your Iraq tour of duties smacks of opportunism to me. As concerns his run for state treasurer, I am sure the chickens of Ohio can rest easier since his platform included making cockfighting a felony. Oh that and divesting pension funds that invest in Iran. Was that really a major issue in Ohio? Since then, after missing so many meetings as Director of the state board that oversees these pension funds, it kind of lessens that campaign plank. Incidentally, was mis-stating the amount of money he oversees by $65 BILLION a Freudian slip, stupidity, or ignorance?

          Again, please explain his family’s relationship to Forest City and the Ratners. I am not saying that Mandel is a closet liberal; I am saying that he is NOT the wunderkid people are making him out to be. And, incidentally, if he was an apparent avid supporter of Gore in 2000, the great Mandel conservative epiphany must have occurred post-2000. Did his tours in Iraq jiggle his brain towards conservatism?

          • http://boldcolor.blogspot.com/ Paula

            Are we really going to hold that against him? Are Jews not allowed to break the family tradition and come over to the conservative side?

            What is your end game here?

          • http://boldcolor.blogspot.com/ Paula

            Seeing Islamic radicalism face to face, seeing our military in action, coming to grips with American exceptionalism., facing your own mortality. Under those circumstances, the question is why doesn’t every soldier return from active duty a conservative.

            I can’t help but think there is an agenda behind your cynicism.

          • aesthete

            in charge of procurement, medical benefits, budgeting, etc. really brings to life just how venal and petty the fiefdoms in government are (and they are much worse in civil bureaucracy).

            With that said, right now I think that davenj is making his case better: where you offer hypothetical, he is offering facts. Nothing wrong with hypotheticals but they don’t compete with real-world data.

          • http://boldcolor.blogspot.com/ Paula

            Let’s start with some endorsements: Marco Rubio,the Club for Growth, Jim DeMint’s Senate Conservatives Fund, Congressman Jim Jordan and conservative commentators Hugh Hewitt and Mark Levin. I believe that Erick has also endorsed him.

            Jim Jordan said of him:

            ” I believe Treasurer Josh Mandel is a fiscal conservative who is committed to changing the deficit culture in Washington. Josh understands that the federal government should balance its budget just like families and small businesses have to do every day

          • davenj1

            Lets take another example. In neighboring Indiana, Lugar received 100% ratings from traditionally conservative groups like the Chamber of Commerce and high ratings in the satisfactory category from groups like the American Conservative Union and National Taxpayers Union. He also received the worst ratings from liberal groups like the ACLU, NAACP, Human Rights Campaign and others. Does that make Lugar a staunch conservative? I think not and the voters of Indiana did not think so either. If you are basing Mandel’s conservative credentials based on endorsements from the Club for Growth or Jim DeMint, then that is your choice. Of course, you failed to mention that Mandel received the endorsement of that “uber-conservative” John McCain also.

            I stand corrected on the cock fighting issue. He voted against the bill making it a felony citing more important business before the Assembly. The law passed anyway, but his vote should get him the endorsement of the Ohio Cockfighters Association although it will cost him the vote of many a rooster.

            Incidentally, his Iran divesture initiative was never signed into law and instead a compromise solution was reached- a gentleman’s agreement and handshake deal.

            Regarding the property tax thing in Lyndhurst, didn’t he, despite being on the finance committee, overstate the city’s finances and the $4 million rebate became $2 million which became $1.5 million? And imagine that- a politician calling for a property tax rebate. Cheapest trick in the book.

            Finally, the housing law discrimination bill. Yes, this is the same Josh Mandel who as head of the Undergraduate Student Government openly advocated for same-sex couple student housing? Not withstanding the religious aspect to the Ohio law, would Mandel support the law?

            And as for the family’s politics, yes it is relevant especially when we are talking about the Ratners and ACORN and how they stole the election for Sherrod Brown the last time around. Forest City is a Ratner company that donated $1.5 million to ACORN for these purposes. ACORN also targeted the Mandel family for solicitations. They were specifically listed in their action memo. Whenever the specter of ACORN or the Ratners are involved, it demands an answer. Is Josh Mandel, the Republican candidate for Senate in Ohio, willing to denounce this?

            Incidentally, the Erickson “endorsement” was in response to his ability to raise funds.

          • http://boldcolor.blogspot.com/ Paula

            You say you’re not from Ohio, but you seem to know every detailed piece of opposition research that has been floated by the MSM and liberal blogs in Ohio. Clearly, you’ve spent a lot of time on this. What dog do you have in this fight?

          • davenj1

            My only “dog in the fight” is a thirst for information- positive and negative. If its out there, its no secret. As I mentioned, most of the information about Mandel was gleaned from a conservative site and following the original cited links.

            No, I am not from Ohio; from New Jersey as the name suggests. In 2010, I was from New Jersey also, but did a series of articles on the midterm elections almost state-by-state. Using the same sources- not only national media sites, but local newspaper articles (sometimes better information there)- I did detailed treatments of Christine O’Donnell in Delaware, John Raese in West Virginia, Joe Miller in Alaska and others. Took a lot of hits for the articles too: “With friends like you, who needs enemies” type comments. Doesn’t mean I did NOT want to see O’Donnell, Raese, or Miller win their elections, just as I would like to see Mandel take down Sherrod Brown in Ohio this year. But that detailed research also led to some pretty accurate projections: picked 35 of 36 Senate races and was over 90% in House races, some of them surprises when expert pundits like Cook, Sabato and others were picking incumbents.

            Sometimes, the best candidates are those without the DC experience. The House need not be a stepping stone to the Senate. Or even being Governor. In Mandel’s case, however, two terms in the state Assembly, a city councilman, and state treasurer- I just don’t realistically see it, unless the dislike of Brown is so high in Ohio. There are positives in his performance as treasurer, but you can’t deny there are also negatives. Like I said, if I lived in Ohio, I would vote for Mandel, although I may not have in the primary.

          • aesthete

            I don’t know much about Mandel, and more information is always better. I’m sure others appreciate you taking the time to lay out what you like about Mandel in detail, as well.

          • tnfriendofcoal101368

            One of them is an avowed socialist; the other is not. Brown sure isn’t a closet liberal; he is a loud and proud liberal. Sign me up for full throated support for Mandel. He might not be Ohio’s best and brightest but he is the only Ohioan who can immediately “retire” Sherrod Brown.

          • davenj1

            Sherrod Brown is probably the most vocal liberal in the Senate. If not, he is a close second to Sheldon Whitehouse of RI. However, I do not believe that Mandel is the only Ohioan who could retire Brown. But, he is the choice of the GOP voters in the primary and, despite my misgivings about him, if I were an Ohioan, I would certainly vote for Mandel over Brown.. My main point is that before everyone goes all goo-goo gaa-gaa over him in knee jerk fashion, do some homework and ask some questions. If not, the Democrats will do it for us and spin it to their advantage.

  • davenj1

    A lot of this information with additional links can be found at conservative-outlooks.com/…/josh-mandel-r-oh-u-s-senate-candidate-not-so-golden/

    Lest you think I rely on Huffington Post or some other liberal sites.

  • stingray11214

    Angus King may be a lot of things to a lot of people. But, Cynthia Dill is going for blood. King and Dill will kill each other. Once the campaign gets going, whoever gets 40% will win. NOBODY is breaking 50. Summers will climb over the wreckage of Dill and King.

  • http://boldcolor.blogspot.com/ Paula

    nt

  • Pingback: hier klicken

  • Pingback: Georgia Crouser

  • Pingback: Cruz Mestanza