« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

A McCain Stumble On The Campaign Trail

Or "how to turn a purse into a sow's ear"

Today, I watched for the second time, a clip prominently running on CNN [the satellite is out to Fox News] in which a woman asks the senator why he voted against a bill that would have provided funding for birth control?

Sen McCain is clearly at a loss for words, having been confronted about a vote he has cast — one out of thousands — and stumbles through a non-response. The clip, predictably stops in mid-speech, leaving the impression that the senator is unable to muster any answer at all.

Failing the discovery of the entire tape and what it might actually reveal — allow me to provide the answer that the good senator SHOULD have made.

“While I do not recall that particular vote, let me ask you Ma’m do you happen to have the actual name of that bill? Failing the name, do you happen to have the Senate bill number?

You see, Ma’m, I see quite a lot of very bad legislation come before the Senate each year — most of it unworthy of ever seeing the light of day. And that, Ma’m is the problem with our government today. If that provision was a part of a much larger, poorly constructed bill that would have done more harm than good, it would be irresponsible to have voted it into law. Now, I am not saying that this is the case right now, but I would need to know which vote, on which bill you are referencing, before I could explain my rationale for the vote that you claim I cast.

In the second place, Ma’m, too often good provisions — very worthy legislation that would benefit the American people — are buried inside Omnibus legislation or huge bills that do nothing more than bloat the Federal budget.

This is not by accident that this happens, Ma’m, but by design. Disingenuous legislators bury necessary legislation — funding for our troops comes to mind — inside bills that are in no way related to the important measures. By tying this necessary legislation to pet spending projects they seek to blackmail the Senate into voting for bad legislation, or suffer this type of questioning later.

It is this type of irresponsible legislating — omnibus spending bills — pork barrel projects costing billions of dollars a year — that I seek to reform. It is this “gotcha” politics brought about by legislators who would spend the people’s money in such a foolish manner, that I have fought against for my entire tenure in Washington. Runaway federal government spending has become epidemic — symptomatic of government’s failure to act in a fiscally responsible manner.

It is this fiscal irresponsibility that I will change as president — vetoing any legislation sent to my desk that contains pork barrel spending — or that lacks proper spending restraint.”

That is the answer that Sen McCain should have given. Perhaps some of his advisers could pass this word on to the good senator, so that the next time someone asks an embarrassing question like this on the campaign trail, he will be ready to turn it back on the left.

COMMENTS

  • Jeff_Emanuel

    n/t

  • Alyosha

    When asked a question about funding for birth control do we really want the Republican candidate to imply that this is “very worth legislation”? Can’t he just say “I voted against subsidizing your condoms because Uncle Sam isn’t running a brothel.”

    • David_Hinz

      of course you have the luxury of NO chance at all of ever being elected to office.

      If the good senator is not going to run a confrontational campaign, why would he say something clearly intended to offend?

      My suggestion is instructive as well as courteous.

      • muxedo76

        if you read my suggested response you would note that there is NOTHING suggesting that the woman’s pet project is “worthy” or “essential” or even “necessary” but the suggested reply points out that such legislation is obscured by the process.

  • pilgrim

    Did the reply come to you immediately upon hearing the lady’s question? If it did I commend you sir for your quick wits.

    I don’t see John McCain being that quick of a wit to this lady or any other questioners. John McCain is not a bad man, but being quick on his feet is not one of his attributes.

    • David_Hinz

      we don’t need the man to dance like Fred Astaire — while the specific question might not have been in his mental rollodex, he has been a politician long enough to be prepared for the occasionally confrontational voter.

      To me, this is a no-brainer. It deflects the question, without appearing to deflect. It points out the absurdity of remembering every single vote over a long career, without pointing out how stupid the question really is.

      And it is an opportunity to teach — how the omnibus legislation that legislators are so fond of ramming through congress is really, really bad.

      • Alyosha

        Well yes, I am pleased to be free of the constraints of running for (or God forbid being elected to) office. So maybe my suggested response is a bit blunt, but is it really too much to ask for a Republican candidate to say clearly and unequivocally that it is not the government’s job to buy condoms? Maybe I’m an old fogie, but I imagine most Americans would be opposed to government-funded birth control as well.

        Incidentally, I do think your suggested answer implies such funding is acceptable. In response to a straightforward question “why did you oppose subsidies for birth control” you’d have McCain answer sometimes he has to oppose “good provisions — very worthy legislation that would benefit the American people” because the bills are laden with bad provisions, without once suggesting this funding is bad.

        I think your answer works when candidates are asked about voting against popular provisions, but I don’t think this is it.

  • aaronbg

    n/t

    • aceintx

      The latest from Carly is that Contraception is a top McCain priority!

      • Justin_Case

        is it really too much to ask for a Republican candidate to say clearly and unequivocally that it is not the government’s job to buy condoms?

        I’m afraid Jesse Ventura type responses are not considered proper with Republican candidates who want to stay in office.

        People have come to expect the government to provide. Shrewd politicians, whose first order of business is counting votes, know this.

  • BooBooKitty

    that until she became smart enough to ask that question in French she shouldn’t be wasting his time.

  • Raven

    stupid requirement to have this field filled. And how do I get a sig again?

  • bs

    right above the horizontal line, underneath the comment count. It’s a link, not a button: “Recommend or unrecommend this diary”. It probably needs to be set off a bit better…maybe center it or something.

  • Justin_Case

    Now that was funny….and for a big part of the electorate that would have worked if he could have pulled it off.

  • Raven

    This link TO a button idea was bad.

    Give us the button back.

  • David_Hinz

    I think they have said it will come back if feasible.

  • Slightly_Askew

    Pourquoi est-ce que vous n’avez pas …er, voter pour le legislation de, um, la chapeau de Jacquemet…

    Dang, I was close.

  • itrytobenice

    Ma’am, I can assure you that never in my lifetime has there been legislation pending before the Senate that only required the government to pay for birth control. There is always more in there.

    And as you know ma’am, the devil is in the details.