« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

UN Agenda, Sustainable development or Enslavement of a Planet

Over two hundred people poured into the Millsboro Delaware Fire Hall, Thursday night to hear a presentation given by the “9-12 Delaware Patriots.” The presentation of the affects of United Nations Agenda 21, also known as, “Sustainable Development” for a “One World Government,” that George Herbert Walker Bush called the, “New World Order.”

President Obama signed his 86th Executive Order (13575) on June 9, that established the White House Rural Council that seems to be in line with the United Nations radical agenda 21, and it is designed to begin taking control of almost all aspects of the lives of 16 percent of the American People. In 1992, President Bush signed the Agreement for the Administrative Implementation of Agenda 21 and another 178 nations also signed.

The objectives of Agenda 21 would be to abolish private property ownership and bring all nations under international economic regulation and law. The new international law would supersede our Constitution and Bill of Rights. Nations would lose their sovereignty and there would be global ownership of natural resources. The goal would be to reduce the human population of the planet by 80 to 85 percent. The educational systems would concentrate on becoming unified with a “dumbing down,” of the global population.

There would be a complete global redistribution of wealth, with the emphasis on “no private ownership of property.” There would a replacement of Judeo-Christian values, with pantheism. Parental rights would be diminished and children would be trained by the state. All citizens would be disarmed and the United Nations would control the Military.

This sounds like a bleak future. If accomplished, this global plan would make slaves of everyone who wasn’t in the controlling elite. This Agenda 21, is all about power and control.

the controlling agents of this, “New World Order” would still have all the rights and privileges that the wealthy icons have today, while the ordinary citizen would have nothing, not even the right to voice grievances. Having already been disarmed, the people could not fight the tyranny they found themselves in.

A recent article in “American Thinker Magazine” by Scott Strzelczyk and Richard Rothschild, details some of the specifics:

“Most Americans are unaware that one of the greatest threats to their freedom may be a United Nation’s program known as Agenda 21. The United Nation’s Department of economic and Social Affairs, Division for Sustainable Development created Agenda 21 as a sustainability agenda which is arguably an amalgamation of socialism and extreme environmentalism brushed with anti-American, anti-capitalist overtones.
A detailed history on sustainable development, definitions, and critical actions can be found here. Section III of the Agenda 21 Plan addresses local community sustainable development. The Preamble and Chapter 28 discuss how Agenda 21 should be implemented at a local level. The United Nations purposely recommends avoiding the term Agenda 21 and suggest a cleverly named alternative, “smart growth.”

Part of Agenda 21 that must be implemented at the local level is, ICLEI, International Council For Local Environmental Initiatives, also known as “Local Governments for Sustainability.”

They will be directing policies that cause: Stack-em and Pack-em housing, traffic congestion, light rail, inaccessible open space, managed control over our lives, management of water, prohibition resource management, fire hazards and private property restrictions
.
If this sounds like Big Brother, it is. We would not longer enjoy the rights that we have become accustomed to. We would not control hardly any aspects of our lives and many would die of futile resistance.

COMMENTS

  • BigRedConservative

    I’m not a particularly big UN fan myself, but I would like you to point me to the exact line references where:
    >Pantheism is mandated to replace monotheistic values
    >The UN takes over the world’s military
    >All private property is made property of the state
    >The global dumbing down of all education

    Or have the black helicopters and the Masons taken you away already?

    • Tbone

      to the reach of the EU into the individual lives of the citizens of the former sovereign nation members of the EU.

      • BigRedConservative

        I can confirm that none of my friends there have been forced to convert to Wicca, have had their children’s exam scripts rewritten by the EU to make them easier, had their property taken from them or had their military disbanded. That said, the EU is a corrosive influence on Europe. But it was developed specifically for an economic supra-sovereign role, whilst the UN is a negotiating body for countries that can legislate at an inferior level to individual countries.

        • Tbone

          NT

    • runner12

      While there are many conspiracy theories linked to Agenda 21, it is a real project and its goal is to use environmental concerns to create a socialist state. It is a reflection of where the “green” movement is today.

      The problem is that people are mixing truth with myth, which results in many good people like yourself being dismissive of Agenda 21 and its real problems. The conspiracy theorists need to give it a rest, because they are hurting their own cause.

      A factual analysis of the Agenda 21 plan is enough cause for alarm, without the added embellishments. The point remains though that we must fight against the modern meme of multiculturalism and push a more nationalist viewpoint. We must also educate people on the real dangers of Agenda 21 and also reduce our role in the UN.

      • westcoastpatriette

        .

        • Donald Ayotte

          I can’t possibly quote a single instance of complete takeover, the whole Agenda 21 theme is a UN governmental takeover of the planet. There is no indication of anything else.
          I can’t think that the UN would have our best interests at heart. As a matter of fact, I know they don’t; they have done nothing but slam America at their meetings and denigrate us before the world.
          Yes, I believe that they would desire to control and govern the world according to their own purposes. It is not in America’s best interests and, it is not a far research in deduction to assume that we can assume that the UN would be a heinous dictatorship..

          • westcoastpatriette

            you on any of your concerns about Agenda 21 or the UN for that matter. I was simply agreeing with runne12 that if we overly embellish and exaggerate our presentation of the threat, we lose credibility as we appear to be overly zealous fear-mongers.

          • westcoastpatriette

            Can you refer me to more info on how to detect if these people are actively engaged in my own local governing bodies? Are they primarily elected city and county officials who are stealthily trying to sneak in their agendas or do they work through sub-committees? We need more practical info on how to detect and combat them locally.

          • runner12

            In my local hometown, in one of the most conservative states in the nation, some local officials were trying to push an aspect of Agenda 21. The people rallied and needless to say, the attempt was defeated.

            But I agree with you that a step by step instruction on how to fight this is needed. I did not even know about the issue until it was defeated. More information based on facts is needed rather than fear-mongering and myth.

            True knowledge, along with how to take action is needed. No more conspiracy theories!

          • Donald Ayotte

            When I attended the meeting at Millsboro Fire Hall in Millsboro Delaware, i was well aware of this problem but these people that presented the Agenda 21 seminar did a great service to the community. There radio website is:
            www.theunsolicitedopinion.com

            I hope this prvides you with all the information that you need. These are great people!!

          • westcoastpatriette

            I will check out the website. I am interested because I suspect my city and county may be very involved.

          • Donald Ayotte

            If you suspect this program is in operation in the county that you live in then you have a right to get involved.
            I know that is already in operation here Deleware. There is not doubt about it.

          • lineholder

            to see if you city or county have become global members.

            http://www.iclei.org/index.php?id=11454

          • Donald Ayotte

            that my state was a conservative state, but I live in Delaware, the home of Joe Biden the sycophant blow-hard in charge. We have a completely conservative group in Sussex County Delaware but the state is in full Agenda 21 mode. It is all being done behind the scenes but we recognize it for what it is. The Vice Progressive President in Charge doesn’t have to reveal his true intent. He only has to bow and scrape to his Majesty, The great and wonderful King Hussein Obama.

          • BigRedConservative

            Do you really think that the UN-a collection of harmless bureaucrats led by a mild-mannered Korean mandarin-is actually planning to take over America through Agenda 21? I read the document carefully and thoroughly, and what I (and, I imagine, most rational people) see is a perhaps misguided but completely well-intentioned attempt to alleviate world poverty through international collaboration.

            As for “slamming” and “denigrating”, their job is to ensure that every country has an equal voice on the world’s stage. Over Iraq they did just that. That is their mandate and they fulfilled that. You can’t expect a supra-national body to kow-tow to America when there are 192 other countries to be listened to.

            So I conclude-the UN is a misguided and naive force for good that exists to provide the best deal for humanity as a whole. It doesn’t desire to take over the world and it does not desire to expand its mandate apart from where necessary. You sir are fear-mongering where it is not necessary.

          • westcoastpatriette

            all kinds of evidence by bashing and mocking this discussion.

            Something tells me you already have a closed mind on this issue, otherwise I might debate you further.

          • BigRedConservative

            And I’ll see. I’m waiting.

          • Donald Ayotte

            People are a lot like pack animals on the plains of the Serengeti in Africa. They herd in large numbers, staying to the inside of the pack, hopeful that they won’t be the one that the lioness picks for her dinner.
            People don’t realize that the whole planet will be picked off just so the United Nations can be the sole and absolute hegemony of the planet. Folks, this is not a game that “we the people,” can afford to lose!

          • Donald Ayotte

            I don’t think you read the document and yes I believe that our president and many people in America think that yielding our power to the United Nations is the best way to go, I don’t believe it for a minute.
            We should all have an equal voice on the “world stage” but every country is not equal in stature with America. (sad but true) and should not have an equal voice. I know that you would not agree with this assessment but that is not my concern. I value your opinion and respect you opinion.

      • Donald Ayotte

        I published this diary to strike some awareness in the American Citizenry. Not to instill fear but awareness that our Republic must be defended constantly from those who would take our Sovereignty.
        Only through educating the American People on the dangers, can we fight to retain the freedom that our forefathers fought to give us. It is our turn at bat and two strikes have come across the plate without us swinging at them. We need to step up to the plate with a clear and concerned mind and bat a HOME RUN when the next pitch is thrown.

  • Pingback: AGENDA 21 | Elect Gresham Bouma

  • lineholder

    and it’s association with urbanization projects in our nation. We have numerous agencies within our government that are directly involved in implementation of these policies, including the Dept. of Homeland Security. GAO listed these agencies in the reports they have provided to Congress during the past few months.

    If ever there was a time to go after these agencies, it is now. We don’t need them. They aren’t necessary. They operate primarily as planning agencies, focusing on the future rather than the present. They are costing us money that we don’t have to spend.

    Everyone keeps saying, “Oh, but going after anything in the GAO list is just a drop in the bucket financially and it really doesn’t matter in the grand scheme of things”. I don’t agree with that. I think these agencies functions could be eliminated very easily, and we’ll be protecting ourselves for other dangerous aspects of the agenda being implemented in the process. Get rid of this potential harm, at least for the time being, and let us have some time to recover.

    President Obama’s determination to keep high-speed rail projects moving forward isn’t just about “being like Europe”…it’s about making progress in the area of urbanization for the purpose of accomplishing some of the goals you’ve mentioned above.

  • jonnymuffin

    I hope our society decides it wants to be free again.

  • Donald Ayotte

    The ICLEI is part of the larger plan. Full implementation of of this part of Agenda 21 would regulate power away from the people and give it to the state. After that, bringing forth the rest of Agenda 21 would be much simpler. Once the UN is established as the government, the Constitution and Bill of rights would be null and void.

  • Donald Ayotte

    I have found that this is a volatile subject that most people want to avoid if possible. This enormous problem must be met with the force of the American people who will speak their mind.
    At the present America just wants the Congress to get along and balance the budget. I know that this is important, but if we don’t have a republic any longer, what is there to defend?
    Let’s address the major problem of saving our republic of further denigration and then take back our precious hard fought freedoms.
    We should be interested in stopping the useless United Nations from furthering their Agenda 21. We should also be further interested in not only defeating their Agenda but improving our Republic to withstand any assault form foreign adversaries. We should become more nationalistic, instead of globalistic.

  • Donald Ayotte

    We all must add something to keep our Republic free.

  • Donald Ayotte

    In Delaware, Agenda is already being implemented in several stages and it’s difficult to stop because the Democrat have a super-majority in the state legislature.
    Democrats have become aggressive because they feel they can’t be stopped. My wife and I have spoken more than once of selling and abandoning this state that is quickly becoming a Marxist State