« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Republicans Must Eliminate Ethanol Mandate

The government’s ethanol mandates embody everything that is wrong with Democrats, RINOs, and Marxists.  It is an unconstitutional regulation that has enriched a few special interests with $7.7 billion taxpayer dollars, regressively drove up the cost of food and fuel; and by extension all products and services that rely on fuel based delivery.  The tax credits for energy producers who blend fuel with ethanol have created so many unintended (or intended by some)  negative consequences that even Al Gore is calling for its repeal.  The tax credits are slated to expire in one month and yet, we have not heard much from the newly elected Republican majority in the House.  Is your Republican Congressman more conservative than Al Gore?

According to analysts at Goldman Sachs, the ethanol industry consumes 41% of the domestic corn crop.  Corn is at the top of the food chain, so by creating an artificial shortage in supply of corn, the feds have caused a spike in the cost of meat and chicken as well. In addition, it costs much more to produce a barrel of ethanol than it does a barrel of oil.  Also, aside for providing corporate welfare to domestic ethanol producers, the government slapped high tariffs on imported ethanol.  This prevents us from importing cheaper, more efficient sugar based ethanol from Brazil.  All of this leads to higher prices for home heating and gasoline for cars.  The costs for trucks are even more devastating, as most domestic products that are transported by trucks are now more expensive for consumers.

Every Republican needs to make this a top priority.  Energy is the lifeblood of our economy, while fuel and food represent the basic needs of the low income Americans whom the liberals purport to defend.  This is a perfect opportunity for us to push a prudent policy that will “stimulate” the economy, save taxpayer dollars, put corrupt lobbyists on the defense, and make political hay from it as the same time.  However, does anyone believe that Fred Upton would support repeal of ethanol if he were to become Chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee?  Call your congressman and tell him/her to vote to repeal the Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit.

Cross-posted to Red Meat Conservative

COMMENTS

  • Death_of_the_Donkey

    plus, ethanol subsidies distort the acreage planted for other crops, which in turn can drive up wheat/soy prices as well.

  • Scope

    and made a speech in some other country recently where he said he was wrong to support the mandate. He said he supported it to help farmers in his home state of Tenn. and Iowa. He was planning on running for the Presidency, and Iowa is the home of Archer Daniels Midland, who is heavily subsidized for growing corn for ethanol.

    I recently read that the EPA is increasing the amount of ethanol that must be used in fuels, while it has been proven in studies that ethanol actually increases the very same pollution the EPA is said to be fighting, not to mention it’s combustibility, and the amount of water needed to produce one gallon of ethanol.

    Glen Beck has been addressing the possibility of not only spikes in food prices, but, the outreageous amount of dollars to purchase foods, if inflation increases to projected levels by some. He claims that one ear of food corn can go as high as $11 per ear. Food corn is used in such a wide variety of foods produced, as well as being food for our meat and poultry farmers. Ethanol producers attempt to convince everyone that they only use a part of the corn product, and, that what’s left is sent off to be used as feed product for cattle. Long way around, and expensive way to produce feed for animals.

    Beck has warned also about prices for cotton going through the roof. Check out Monsanto, and see how many of their people have been in and out of federal Government positions, going way back, and including the Bush administration.

  • avgjo

    I know Redstate’s influence can be huge with the GOP. We need to start beating the drum loudly until this trash stops.

    I am so happy to see someone addressing this.

    We are sacrificing our food supply at the altar of Gaia. The real God will not approve of this.

  • http://www.flaliberty.org scorpio0679

    I tried to find the article I read yesterday dealing with this but it analyzed the efficiency of ethanol production in terms of its energy cost to produce versus its output. The study concluded that AT BEST it costs 126% of the fuel output in conventional fossil fuels to make ethanol.

    So basically to get 1 gallon of ethanol you have to burn 1.26 gallons of gasoline. So ethanol doesn’t even make sense from a “green energy” point of view.

  • E Pluribus Unum

    I may be alone in this opinion, but I think not. Iowa gets one HECK of alot of attention from presidential hopefuls, pretty much 3 years out of the 4 year election cycle. People who should know better make ridiculous pitches in order to ingratiate themselves to the people of Iowa.

    Corn ethanol propped up by ethanol mandates is part of that pork, so to speak.

    • http://redmeatconservative.blogspot.com/ dhorowitz3

      That is one of my pet peeves. At best, Iowa is a purple state. Why should they be rewarded with first rights to cast their verdict on out nominee. Shouldn’t that go to a southern state like SC or OK, TX?

      • E Pluribus Unum

        And I have been pushing (rather a lonely job) a proposal that includes true-red states in the 2 opening slots.

  • deevee

    the others ie. wind must go, also. Our tax dollars for these political subsidies are locking up our economy for hoax and frauds.

  • conservativecurmudgeon

    There is no such thing as a perpetual motion machine.

    There is this force in nature, known as “friction”.. And friction dictates that anytime you convert one source of energy into another, you loose the overall power of both by half. This applies to “Ethanol” in especial.

    Follow along…

    With ethanol, you have to power a tractor to disk a field (unless it’s a “no till” operation, in which case you have to truck in more RoundUp, which must also be manufactured and shipped)–then you have to power a tractor to plant the field. Then, you have to supply electricity to power the well-pump to irrigate the field for several months, or rely on nature to provide the irrigation. Then you have to power a tractor to apply herbicides and pesticides, and cultivate. Then you have to power a harvest combine, and several tender trucks to harvest the corn. Then you have to power several tractor-trailer grain-haulers and send the corn to the elevator, where, depending on the moisture that season, it will need to be dried before it is sent to the ethanol plant. All of these vehicles use diesel fuel, and the elevator is likely coal-powered by the local coal-burning electrical generation plant.

    I won’t even go into the amount of energy required to get the train-loads of corn to the ethanol plant, and the outrageously fuel-intensive processes of milling, screening, mashing, fermenting, and storing the ethanol. Each step of this process require vast amounts of electricity or other already cracked or refined fuels.

    Oh, sure, you can eliminate a few steps in this process by using “cellulose” instead of food grains. But corn is full of yeast-loving simple sugars. You can even use lawn clippings, if you prefer, it just takes a lot of them. Nothing, absolutely nothing, though, beats a pipe into the ground that delivers a carbon-rich product in a pipline that practically refines itself by gravity:

    Petroleum. Unless it’s uranium.