Comments on: The Real Problem With Romney’s Comments http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/02/02/the-real-problem-with-romneys-comments/ Wed, 19 Jun 2013 03:38:07 +0000 hourly 1 By: Aaron Gardner http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/02/02/the-real-problem-with-romneys-comments/#comment-7461 Aaron Gardner Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:31:46 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3055#comment-7461 Your chosen scriptural rebuke is a non-sequitor. I wasn’t holding Mitt responsible for George’s actions. I was making a judgement on George’s actions only.

I suppose I could rebuke you with Exodus 20:16, but I think the effort would be wasted.

]]> By: Juggernaut http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/02/02/the-real-problem-with-romneys-comments/#comment-7460 Juggernaut Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:12:52 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3055#comment-7460 This is the same man who claimed to be both moderate and progressive. As for tarring, he deserves it considering the kind of campaign he’s running. Don’t worry, I’ll change the Sig soon but people should know plus haven’t conservatives tarred Obama since 2007?

]]> By: Ann_W http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/02/02/the-real-problem-with-romneys-comments/#comment-7457 Ann_W Sat, 04 Feb 2012 20:38:54 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3055#comment-7457 Sons aren’t held responsible for the sins of their fathers.

]]> By: Aaron Gardner http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/02/02/the-real-problem-with-romneys-comments/#comment-7426 Aaron Gardner Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:25:21 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3055#comment-7426 ntntnt

]]> By: Ann_W http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/02/02/the-real-problem-with-romneys-comments/#comment-7425 Ann_W Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:10:29 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3055#comment-7425 Detroit was having race riots, so G. Romney was reaching out to people who could help him with that. If Alinsky had influence in this area, why would he not be willing to meet with him. Rules for Radicals was published in 1971 so G. Romney would not have even had access to all his radical notions, but even if he did, he was trying to do something about race riots and thought this community organizer could help him. But you’ll tar him for being an admirer of Alinsky for that.

Then because the G. Romney had one contact with Alinsky in the context of getting help for race riots, his son gets tagged as “influenced by Alinsky.”
The most ridiculous thing I’ve heard all day, and I get up early.

]]> By: mikelindell2 http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/02/02/the-real-problem-with-romneys-comments/#comment-7424 mikelindell2 Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:05:34 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3055#comment-7424 Stop watching Fox and do some research, son. And no, I don’t care who he has ever sat on a couch with

]]> By: edintexas http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/02/02/the-real-problem-with-romneys-comments/#comment-7419 edintexas Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:03:36 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3055#comment-7419 Romney has doubled down in pointing out he has no Conservative bonafides. He supports automatic increases in the Minority Youth Unemployment Statute, AKA Federal Minimum Wage.

]]> By: rsklaroff http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/02/02/the-real-problem-with-romneys-comments/#comment-7418 rsklaroff Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:00:52 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3055#comment-7418 …as he attacks Mitt for his support of the minimum-wage being pegged to the cost-of-living.

]]> By: edintexas http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/02/02/the-real-problem-with-romneys-comments/#comment-7417 edintexas Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:00:15 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3055#comment-7417 If you were a Conservative, you would understand the difference between the Conservative position and supporting government welfare.

]]> By: edintexas http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/02/02/the-real-problem-with-romneys-comments/#comment-7415 edintexas Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:57:04 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3055#comment-7415 Romney is in favor of the “safety net”. If there is a problem with the safety net, Romney will “fix it”.

The Conservative answer is to help people out of poverty, reducing the need for the “social safety net”. That is not what Romney was even close to trying to say. Yes, the poor will be with us always, but we can try to reduce the incidence of poverty. And, it is worth pointing out, Christ wasn’t talking about a government safety net. Christ charged each of us with a personal responsibility for charity, not having the government take on the task by taking from Peter to support Paul.

]]> By: edintexas http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/02/02/the-real-problem-with-romneys-comments/#comment-7414 edintexas Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:50:44 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3055#comment-7414 That’s true. Those who have no principles also have no ideology beyond personal aggrandizement. Romney has proven he lacks firm principles, the rest follows.

]]> By: Juggernaut http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/02/02/the-real-problem-with-romneys-comments/#comment-7413 Juggernaut Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:35:09 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3055#comment-7413 to get a response, then they go to Romney. There’s an AP update from Newt’s camp saying they have no meeting this afternoon, so now the drama queens in the media go to guessing Romney. I suppose Santorum is next.

]]> By: Juggernaut http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/02/02/the-real-problem-with-romneys-comments/#comment-7412 Juggernaut Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:31:33 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3055#comment-7412 for another boring year.

]]> By: Ann_W http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/02/02/the-real-problem-with-romneys-comments/#comment-7411 Ann_W Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:30:10 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3055#comment-7411 Look, I think he’s a clown, too, and don’t care about his endorsement. But this is sour grapes. Newt’s people were slobbering all over themselves announcing that Trump would endorse him. Then when Trump didn’t, you’re going to say, “We didn’t want his endorsement anyway.” LOL

]]> By: WillWong http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/02/02/the-real-problem-with-romneys-comments/#comment-7410 WillWong Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:19:27 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3055#comment-7410 Looks like Trump has succumbed to the electability issue. Wasn’t that hard to figure him out. You just have to get through his gimmicks! Not sure if his endorsement is a benefit! 27% said his endorsement will make it less likely for them to vote for that candidate while 10% said they are more likely to vote. Most said no effect! I would imagine his $$$$$$$ meant more!

]]> By: carolynr http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/02/02/the-real-problem-with-romneys-comments/#comment-7409 carolynr Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:16:40 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3055#comment-7409 While I do not go along with all the arguments of the birther issue….
look at this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H3aCfR8rmrw

I realize that there is drama here…but look at the bills presented!

]]> By: Juggernaut http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/02/02/the-real-problem-with-romneys-comments/#comment-7408 Juggernaut Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:11:01 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3055#comment-7408 Trump has beclowed himself and laughed at during the Presidents Correspondence dinner. I don’t think any candidate could benefit. Unless Trump walked away and avoided commenting, his mouth has a way of ending up with his foot inside.

]]> By: WillWong http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/02/02/the-real-problem-with-romneys-comments/#comment-7407 WillWong Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:03:25 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3055#comment-7407 Also perfectly ok to primary him in 2016 if he governs the wrong way! Just cannot imagine what will be left of the country with 4 more years of Obama.

That said, i am convinced that Newt can still beat Romney….especially if God fearing people all over the country cry out to God for mercy on this nation.

]]> By: angryguy77 http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/02/02/the-real-problem-with-romneys-comments/#comment-7406 angryguy77 Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:40:56 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3055#comment-7406 If you don’t vote for mitt if he’s the nominee, you’re an idiot to some here at RS. You are supposed to vote for him no matter if he’s a conservative or not, You see, it makes perfect sense to throw one liberal out and replace him with another and screw our chances of trying to get a true conservative in the WH in 2016.

This is why he will not get my vote if he’s the nominee. I don’t believe he will be that much better than Obama.

]]> By: rsklaroff http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/02/02/the-real-problem-with-romneys-comments/#comment-7405 rsklaroff Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:36:21 +0000 http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3055#comment-7405 http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46233761#.Tyq7LVxSRBE

AP sources: Trump intends to endorse Romney

By BETH FOUHY, KASIE HUNT

LAS VEGAS ? Three Republican officials are telling The Associated Press that Donald Trump intends to endorse Mitt Romney’s presidential bid. Trump plans to make the announcement Thursday afternoon at his casino hotel in Las Vegas.
The surprise development comes even though Newt Gingrich had informed close advisers Wednesday night that he had expected to win the real estate developer’s support.
The GOP officials spoke on the condition of anonymity so as not to pre-empt Trump’s announcement.

]]>