« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Another Capitulation on Postal “Reform”

As we’ve noted in recent weeks, there is an effort to bail out the Postal Service with phony accounting measures.  Democrats are currently voting on amendments to  a bailout bill (S. 1789) that leaves taxpayers on the hook, without reforming the USPS with structural changes that the Postmaster General himself supports.

This bill will offer a backhanded channel to grant the USPS $41 billion from the Treasury.  This is accomplished in two ways.  First, the bill would rebate $11.1 billion in “overpayments” to the Treasury.  The problem is that these are not overpayments. Last year, the GAO ruled that the Postal Service was wrong in their assertion that they overpaid for employee retirement benefits. After all, like anyone who pays a fixed amount into a pension fund with a variable rate of interest, there are ups and downs depending on the market. As such, any money recouped from the Treasury would engender more taxpayer funding.

Second, this bill would re-amortize the entire prefunded payment structure, denying the Treasury of nearly $30 billion. Supporters of the bill refer to it as an intra-governmental transfer. In reality, it is a backhanded bailout.
Even the Postmaster General, Patrick Donahoe, wants to reform the Post Office and cut $22 billion in costs by closing offices and ending Saturday delivery.  This bill precludes those reforms and ensures that the USPS will remain insolvent, exposing taxpayers to future bailouts.

Earlier in the day, Senator Sessions tried to raise a point of order against the bill, noting that it would violate the Budget Control Act by increasing the debt through reduced funding in the treasury.  This is yet another example where Republicans could have blocked a bad piece of legislation by denying Democrats the 60 votes they needed to waive the point of order.  But with the help of 9 Republicans, they defeated the point of order and proceeded with debate on the bill that will likely pass.

Later on, Senator McCain proposed a substitute amendment (S. 1625), which would create a new postal oversight board (similar to BRAC)  to close $3 billion worth of facilities over a two-year period and seize financial authority over the Postal Service if it defaults with more than a $2 billion deficit for more than two years.  It would also allow them to make reforms, such as ending Saturday delivery.  This will ensure that the USPS either succeeds on its own merits or becomes a private entity – free of government regulations, but also free of its government-sponsored monopoly on first class mail.  The bill closely mirrors the Issa-Ross bill in the House.  Yet, once again 16 Republicans joined with Democrats to defeat this modest reform bill.

This is going to be a long week on the Hill….

COMMENTS

  • http://www.internationalpolicydigest.org/author/william-eger/ vmibill95

    NO coverage of this bill on MSM. Dems continue to try and funnel money to the Obama Campaign via contributions from Union dues.

  • ThePoliticalHat

    I’d just like to point out that at least the Post Office is authorized by the Constitution, unlike most of what we spend out money on.

    That’s not a defense of their incompetence, however.

  • Next93

    I work with numbers every day. Numbers are my friends. Numbers never lie to me. I hate these people who torture numbers until they can find ways to “pay” for a hopeless (but politically significant) government program using money that simply doesn’t exist.

    How do these people get to adulthood without learning that there are things that you’d like to have but simply can’t afford? I just don’t understand how they can keep writing checks out of a treasury that’s EMPTY, and think that it’s morally superior to making necessary cuts thaat will allow us to continue as a (nearly) going concern.

    You know those bumper stickers that self-righteoisly proclaim that “Hate is not a family value”? (and, by the way, who said it was?). Well, maybe the GOP motto for this election should be “Collective Bankruptcy is Not a Family Value”

  • BlueLandRed

    we should just let the Post Office sells stamps at whatever price it needs to make a small profit. Having Congress micromanage the USPS seems nonsensical.

    • The_Gadfly

      But I think it makes even more sense to increase the bulk rate charges to the point that they pay for themselves. And I say that as someone who has helped non-profits take advantage of bulk rates. Frankly the Post Office should be free to set all postal rates for all mail and packages they deliver.

      • BlueLandRed

        Indeed, it’s not rocket science. Let the Post Office hire some consultant and have them figure out what rates to charge for postage. That Congress has to always insert their “two cents: is retarded.

        • GregInFla

          USPS cannot provide one class of service at a loss (e.g. overnight mail) in order and make it up on another class of service (first class letters). Thus, it cannot compete in the same way in the same markets as private enterprise. This was directed by Congress.

          • The_Gadfly

            between bullk mail and first class, I find it impossible to believe that is true. If bulk rates truly paid for themselves, even with smaller volumes for first class, they’d be swimming in money.

  • The_Gadfly

    but the fact of the matter is that it goes nowhere so long as their is even a HINT of discontinuing Saturday delivery. That’s when working families get their packages and go to the post office. Any other day of the week they can cancel, just not Saturday. My personal recommendation would be either Tuesday or Thursday so businesses have Monday and Friday for their early deliveries and last minute shipments. But any day of the workweek could work.

  • GregInFla

    Provide a 401K plan and some matching funds and let the employees manage their own retirement. Costs are then paid in the period they are incurred. Can we get pension plans outlawed in government somehow???

    • The_Gadfly

      But you can’t do away with the existing plans. And its the existing plans that cause the problems. This is one of many things that, if Congress had simply adopted them on a going forward only basis when Reagan was in office and proposed them, would have alleviated problems we are having now. Of course they are the bread and butter for unions, and unions are the bread and butter for Democrats.

  • http://impudent.edublogs.org/ kyle8

    simply have them charge enough for bulk advertising mailings to cover their costs. As it stands the postal service amounts to a huge subsidy to the advertising costs of American businesses from the taxpayer.

    And no one wants all the junk mail anyway.

  • mkozikowski

    With all this kick-back, graft and give-a-way to the USPS, the true cost of a $0.40 Stamp must now be more like $5.00.

    Who uses the mail these days, anyway. Legal documents use FedEx or the like, Casual conversations use electronic media.

    what is it, junk mail, bills, and Holiday cards. That’s about it. AND I am sure we can work out those issues if we needed to.