<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charting a Path To Reauthorizing Free Markets and Ending Statism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/05/17/charting-a-path-to-reauthorizing-free-markets-and-ending-statism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/05/17/charting-a-path-to-reauthorizing-free-markets-and-ending-statism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 17:24:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: justperhaps45</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/05/17/charting-a-path-to-reauthorizing-free-markets-and-ending-statism/#comment-9457</link>
		<dc:creator>justperhaps45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3694#comment-9457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In some areas flood insurance makes sense equal to sun rise insurance. Didn&#039;t someone make a movie: Dumb and Dumber?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In some areas flood insurance makes sense equal to sun rise insurance. Didn&#8217;t someone make a movie: Dumb and Dumber?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justperhaps45</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/05/17/charting-a-path-to-reauthorizing-free-markets-and-ending-statism/#comment-9458</link>
		<dc:creator>justperhaps45</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3694#comment-9458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In some areas flood insurance makes sense equal to sun rise insurance. Didn&#039;t someone make a movie: Dumb and Dumber?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In some areas flood insurance makes sense equal to sun rise insurance. Didn&#8217;t someone make a movie: Dumb and Dumber?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ss396</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/05/17/charting-a-path-to-reauthorizing-free-markets-and-ending-statism/#comment-9451</link>
		<dc:creator>ss396</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 19:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3694#comment-9451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Setting the alphabet soup of agencies on a path of diminution and eventual disappearance is workable without requiring violent disruption of the dependencies that have grown around them. If their vaporization can be achieved in six to eight years, so much the better.  Still, it will take a great deal of political discipline to keep the direction of those programs focused toward their elimination.

Some of that could be helped by selecting certain agencies and programs that can be pushed immediately to the States.  The flood insurance program is one of those. The actual policies are issued through the various insurance agencies; there is no reason why those could not be policies of the private companies instead of a Federal program. Oh sure, there would be arguments about coverages (and non-coverages!). But in Texas we are going through all of those arguments, but it concerns wind damage.  Also, we&#039;ve been through this before with the whole mold-damage issue. 

The wind damage and mold damage issues did not go national, and never rose to the level of Federal guarantees.  From that, I see no reason for flood insurance to rise to the level of Federal guarantees, either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Setting the alphabet soup of agencies on a path of diminution and eventual disappearance is workable without requiring violent disruption of the dependencies that have grown around them. If their vaporization can be achieved in six to eight years, so much the better.  Still, it will take a great deal of political discipline to keep the direction of those programs focused toward their elimination.</p>
<p>Some of that could be helped by selecting certain agencies and programs that can be pushed immediately to the States.  The flood insurance program is one of those. The actual policies are issued through the various insurance agencies; there is no reason why those could not be policies of the private companies instead of a Federal program. Oh sure, there would be arguments about coverages (and non-coverages!). But in Texas we are going through all of those arguments, but it concerns wind damage.  Also, we&#8217;ve been through this before with the whole mold-damage issue. </p>
<p>The wind damage and mold damage issues did not go national, and never rose to the level of Federal guarantees.  From that, I see no reason for flood insurance to rise to the level of Federal guarantees, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drfredc</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/05/17/charting-a-path-to-reauthorizing-free-markets-and-ending-statism/#comment-9448</link>
		<dc:creator>drfredc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 18:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3694#comment-9448</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All too often, analysis of what is wrong with our government and how to fix this morass is all about putting bandaids on a cancer, or perhaps lopping off a chunk here or there, without getting into treating the environment that created the cancer in the first place.  To put it simply, pols and burrocrats have defined benefit retirement plans that separate them from the marketplace.  They feel little to no significant consequences for any of their actions.  It&#039;s like the obese guy who gets everyone to bring him his beer and chips while they flab away in front of the Boob Tube 24/7.   

 If the pols (of both parties) and burros did feel the marketplace consequences of their actions, they&#039;d all play a lot more attention to how to fix things in fashions that benefit the marketplace, rather than just creating new gubermint tax and regulatory mudholes to muck up the flow of commerce.  

Sure, there are plenty of ways to fix things, as well as ways to bandaid over things.  A group whose base incentives are askew from the marketplace problems they are trying to fix are not likely to ever get things fixed until their core incentives are brought closer in line to the marketplace problems they are attempting to fix.  Otherwise, it&#039;s like letting baseball players determine the rules for football.  They&#039;ve got no skin in the game of football -- the result would be a mess, not unlike the mess created by politicians and burrocrats who have little to no skin in the marketplace game they are attempting to tax and regulate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All too often, analysis of what is wrong with our government and how to fix this morass is all about putting bandaids on a cancer, or perhaps lopping off a chunk here or there, without getting into treating the environment that created the cancer in the first place.  To put it simply, pols and burrocrats have defined benefit retirement plans that separate them from the marketplace.  They feel little to no significant consequences for any of their actions.  It&#8217;s like the obese guy who gets everyone to bring him his beer and chips while they flab away in front of the Boob Tube 24/7.   </p>
<p> If the pols (of both parties) and burros did feel the marketplace consequences of their actions, they&#8217;d all play a lot more attention to how to fix things in fashions that benefit the marketplace, rather than just creating new gubermint tax and regulatory mudholes to muck up the flow of commerce.  </p>
<p>Sure, there are plenty of ways to fix things, as well as ways to bandaid over things.  A group whose base incentives are askew from the marketplace problems they are trying to fix are not likely to ever get things fixed until their core incentives are brought closer in line to the marketplace problems they are attempting to fix.  Otherwise, it&#8217;s like letting baseball players determine the rules for football.  They&#8217;ve got no skin in the game of football &#8212; the result would be a mess, not unlike the mess created by politicians and burrocrats who have little to no skin in the marketplace game they are attempting to tax and regulate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barleycorn</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/05/17/charting-a-path-to-reauthorizing-free-markets-and-ending-statism/#comment-9447</link>
		<dc:creator>barleycorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 18:06:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3694#comment-9447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree 100%. The problem (as you stated clearly) is that statism begets dependency which in turn begets more statism and on and on.

Statism also creates a culture of excessive focus on safety, security, peace, etc. I&#039;m all for safety, security, and peace, but not at the expense of liberty, freedom, and justice.

Try explaining to almost any group of Americans today that laws intended to insure the safety of our food supply, medicine, and building construction, also lead to a loss of freedom in ever increasing incremental amounts, and you will be met with a mixture of laughter, anger, and uncomprehending stares. 

Statism isn&#039;t like Brylcream because each dab leads to a bigger dab until all that&#039;s left is a greasy mess.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree 100%. The problem (as you stated clearly) is that statism begets dependency which in turn begets more statism and on and on.</p>
<p>Statism also creates a culture of excessive focus on safety, security, peace, etc. I&#8217;m all for safety, security, and peace, but not at the expense of liberty, freedom, and justice.</p>
<p>Try explaining to almost any group of Americans today that laws intended to insure the safety of our food supply, medicine, and building construction, also lead to a loss of freedom in ever increasing incremental amounts, and you will be met with a mixture of laughter, anger, and uncomprehending stares. </p>
<p>Statism isn&#8217;t like Brylcream because each dab leads to a bigger dab until all that&#8217;s left is a greasy mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: General_Confusion</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/05/17/charting-a-path-to-reauthorizing-free-markets-and-ending-statism/#comment-9446</link>
		<dc:creator>General_Confusion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 17:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3694#comment-9446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being the party of &quot;me too&quot; is bankrupting us.  

The defict is exploding and we no longer even attempt to nibble even at the edges.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being the party of &#8220;me too&#8221; is bankrupting us.  </p>
<p>The defict is exploding and we no longer even attempt to nibble even at the edges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evilbloggerlady</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/05/17/charting-a-path-to-reauthorizing-free-markets-and-ending-statism/#comment-9445</link>
		<dc:creator>evilbloggerlady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 17:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3694#comment-9445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;a href=&quot;http://evilbloggerlady.blogspot.com/2012/05/curious-lies-of-andrew.html&quot;&gt;No surprise on the lies, but we have to push back...&lt;/a&gt;

I agree the GOP is not blameless for this mess.  I am  very skeptical of our GOP elites when it comes to serious deficit reduction.  But the Democrats are not going to do it (they will make the problem  even worse), so our only hope right now is the GOP being pushed kicking and screaming toward real fiscal reform..  We need to get rid of Barack Obam a and elect more fiscal conservatives to the House and Senate.  It is the only way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://evilbloggerlady.blogspot.com/2012/05/curious-lies-of-andrew.html">No surprise on the lies, but we have to push back&#8230;</a></p>
<p>I agree the GOP is not blameless for this mess.  I am  very skeptical of our GOP elites when it comes to serious deficit reduction.  But the Democrats are not going to do it (they will make the problem  even worse), so our only hope right now is the GOP being pushed kicking and screaming toward real fiscal reform..  We need to get rid of Barack Obam a and elect more fiscal conservatives to the House and Senate.  It is the only way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
