<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Next in Our Dump Upton Series</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/05/22/the-next-in-our-dump-upton-series/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/05/22/the-next-in-our-dump-upton-series/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 17:24:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Flagstaff</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/05/22/the-next-in-our-dump-upton-series/#comment-9619</link>
		<dc:creator>Flagstaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 01:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3711#comment-9619</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Remember last year when Rep. Marsha Blackburn tried to get a vote to rescind the ban on incandescent light bulbs?  She got no help at all from other Repubs.

Somebody or a bunch of somebodies got their palms greased on that one.  And on the original one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember last year when Rep. Marsha Blackburn tried to get a vote to rescind the ban on incandescent light bulbs?  She got no help at all from other Repubs.</p>
<p>Somebody or a bunch of somebodies got their palms greased on that one.  And on the original one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flagstaff</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/05/22/the-next-in-our-dump-upton-series/#comment-9617</link>
		<dc:creator>Flagstaff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 21:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3711#comment-9617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[everywhere]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>everywhere</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vnov5</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/05/22/the-next-in-our-dump-upton-series/#comment-9616</link>
		<dc:creator>vnov5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 21:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3711#comment-9616</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It appears that you are associating the term &quot;liberal&quot; with a statement by the Chairman of Energy and Commerce that the science and modeling for anthropogenic global warming is established.  That is not &quot;liberal&quot; - it is conservative.  I realize those terms have been bent into usage that is totally at odds with their meaning (thank you W), but agreeing with the position of every expert on a subject is not &quot;liberal thinking&quot; - it is conservative.

Before you dismiss this post, please do a little homework.  If you are actually conservative - including the quality of being a realist - then you should not be dismissive of a fact as established as athropogenic global warming.  

What we should do about it and how quickly we should be doing it, is a different question.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It appears that you are associating the term &#8220;liberal&#8221; with a statement by the Chairman of Energy and Commerce that the science and modeling for anthropogenic global warming is established.  That is not &#8220;liberal&#8221; &#8211; it is conservative.  I realize those terms have been bent into usage that is totally at odds with their meaning (thank you W), but agreeing with the position of every expert on a subject is not &#8220;liberal thinking&#8221; &#8211; it is conservative.</p>
<p>Before you dismiss this post, please do a little homework.  If you are actually conservative &#8211; including the quality of being a realist &#8211; then you should not be dismissive of a fact as established as athropogenic global warming.  </p>
<p>What we should do about it and how quickly we should be doing it, is a different question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tnfriendofcoal101368</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/05/22/the-next-in-our-dump-upton-series/#comment-9615</link>
		<dc:creator>tnfriendofcoal101368</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3711#comment-9615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[too &quot;conservative&quot; for Massachusetts 4....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>too &#8220;conservative&#8221; for Massachusetts 4&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikefisk</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/2012/05/22/the-next-in-our-dump-upton-series/#comment-9614</link>
		<dc:creator>mikefisk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 19:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dhorowitz3/?p=3711#comment-9614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...not that it actually carries any weight, but from living in the district I&#039;ve been hearing the Democratic challenger for that district campaign on the idea that Upton is too conservative for this district anymore.

I&#039;m hoping that&#039;s not the case, as the Democrat seems to be boilerplate &quot;useful idiot&quot;, but I can see the attack ads against Hoogendyk writing themselves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;not that it actually carries any weight, but from living in the district I&#8217;ve been hearing the Democratic challenger for that district campaign on the idea that Upton is too conservative for this district anymore.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping that&#8217;s not the case, as the Democrat seems to be boilerplate &#8220;useful idiot&#8221;, but I can see the attack ads against Hoogendyk writing themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
