David Brock says he got famous for calling Anita Hill "a slut."That is his own description of how he became famous.Compounding the irony, David Brock says Rush Limbaugh made him famous. That's right folks, the head of Media Matters For America, on a personal quest to destroy Rush Limbaugh after spectacularly failing to do the same to Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Anita Hill, and more, actually said, "Limbaugh was making me famous for calling Anita Hill a slut."If you haven't paid attention these past few months, from the Daily Caller investigation into David Brock to David Brock trying to get Rush off the air, David Brock really thinks the world revolves around David Brock. And David Brock tries to set up as much spin as he can to try to make you think the world revolves around David Brock.In fact, the reality is David Brock has a self-inflated sense of self-worth. He surrounds himself with bodyguards convinced someone somewhere wants to do him harm while he maligns the reputations of others, dabbled in illegal drugs, seemingly suffers from some level of instability, and felt obligated to pay his ex-boyfriend $850,000.00 to keep the ex-boyfriend quiet about Media Matters.It's no wonder, with all the stories pouring out about how pathetic David Brock actually is, that David Brock is trying to divert attention to Rush Limbaugh. But you know what? Not only is the effort against Limbaugh failing, it is failing badly.Consequently, Brock is shifting gears — bragging about the money he is raising, which he actually isn't, and trying to take credit for Cumulus Media potentially replacing the Rush Limbaugh Show with the Mike Huckabee Show, which so far hasn't panned out.First, let's look at the failing Limbaugh campaign.
David Brock wants you to know he can take out Rush Limbaugh. His effort has been so effective Rush Limbaugh's ratings are up pretty significantly.But it is not just that. As I told you would happen, new advertisers are filling the void left by other advertisers fleeing. The hit to Rush's bottom line really never happened. Not only that, the much ballyhooed memo from Cumulus directing stations to move barter advertisers around Limbaugh's show has been recinded.
On Monday, the 600 or so radio stations that air Limbaugh’s program were told by his syndicator, Premiere Radio Networks, to resume running “barter” ads during his program. Stations are required to run these ads in exchange for paying discounted fees to Premiere to air Limbaugh’s show. Premiere, which is owned by radio giant Clear Channel Communications, had suspended the “barter” requirement for two weeks in a move widely seen as a way to give advertisers a chance to lie low while Limbaugh was in the news.
So what is Media Matters left to do? Try to take credit for Mike Huckabee's show potentially replacing Limbaugh. Follow along here.There is no doubt Media Matters and MoveOn.org are working together on this project. The Washington Post notes that MoveOn.org wants Rush off 180 stations. Media Matters is running an ad campaign in seven markets to aid in that effort.What they are not pointing out is that Cumulus Media expects to have Mike Huckabee in 140 markets with an initial launch of 50 markets. As I reported last week, Media Matters is running anti-Rush ads on several Cumulus stations that are thought likely to replace Rush Limbaugh with Mike Hucakbee if only to save the stations money. Huckabee, a Cumulus property and a new show, would be vastly cheaper than Rush Limbaugh.When Huckabee's show expands and Cumuls begins the replacement process, MoveOn.org and Media Matters will undoubtedly take credit for something they had absolutely nothing to do with. It is typical David Brock.But wait . . . there's more.It's not just the craptacular effort to get Rush off the air, David Brock wants you to think he is a fundraising machine. According to the New York Times, he raised $23 million for his various projects in 2010. New York Magazine says the same. He wants to be the guy who takes down Fox, the guy who takes down Rush, and be forgotten as the guy who never took down the Clintons, Anita Hill, or really anyone else.There's just one problem.According to the Media Matters for America (MMFA) and related Media Matters Action Network (MMAN) 2010 990's, their 2010 fundraising was about $14.6 million. The 501(c)3 raised $13.2 million and the 501(c)4 raised $1.4 million. That leaves them almost $9 million short of the $23 million David Brock bragged about (assuming they raised nothing after Brock claimed $23 million in the November 2010 New York Times article). David Brock also has "Equality Matters", but that seems to be a project within MMAN, which did not launch until December 2010, and the Progressive Talent Initiative, but that is also a project within Media Matters, not a separate group. And then there's American Bridge....but that raised $0 in 2010.In the 990s, a Democratic fundraising shop, Bonner Group, is credited with all, or almost all, fundraising for Media Matters. Isn't David Brock supposed to be some kind of "legendary" fundraiser? Just get a load of the self-indulgent quotes from Jason Zengerle's New York Magazine article.
"With doors opened, Brock got busy with what has emerged as perhaps his greatest talent: persuading rich liberals to give him their money."
"Brock’s fund-raising prowess is the stuff of legend—and some mystery—on the left. He explains it as simply a question of having the right attitude."
"But Brock’s greatest fund-raising tool is his personal story..."
"Brock received the news of Beck’s departure just as he was about to walk into a meeting with potential donors at a hedge fund in midtown."
"In an interview with the New York Times, he boasted of his fund-raising record with Media Matters and predicted even greater success for American Bridge..."
Of course all this bragging may get David Brock and Media Matters into trouble.Consider these similarly self-indulgent quotes from a New York Times profile of David Brock.
"Certain to set off debate, however, is that Mr. Brock appears to be positioning his new organization so that fund-raising consultants can raise money for Democratic-oriented media efforts not just through American Bridge but also via one of the nonprofit organizations Mr. Brock currently runs, Media Matters Action Network, which does not disclose its donors."
"The action network, which tracks conservative politicians and advocacy organizations, is organized as a 501(c)(4) nonprofit group and is set to take on an expanded role in the 2012 elections, including potentially running television ads, according to an internal draft concept paper about American Bridge’s and Media Matter Action Network’s plans obtained by The New York Times."
Based on the second quote, shouldn't every candidate Media Matters supports have to answer to Alan Dershowitz over Media Matters' well documented anti-semetism?Adding those quotes to what the Daily Caller and others have turned up, won't the IRS be interested into Media Matters' tax status?Between David Brock hyping his own importance and his fundraising numbers with nothing to really show for either, surely Democratic donors who've been far more willing to hold their action groups accountable than the right will start questioning him. And surely the IRS will too.