Gov. Sarah Palin's promised op-ed has finally been published by the Anchorage Daily News. In the opinion piece, the governor gives a federalist explanation of why she vetoed $28.6 million of the Obama administration's stimulus funds:
"My record is clear. I support conserving energy through weatherization and I'm an advocate for harnessing renewable sources of energy. But conditions here required more 'big brother' government involvement than most Alaskans want and the new [universal energy building] codes could cost Alaskans thousands of dollars per new home and renovation."
Citing Alaska's history of independence and opposition to federal involvement in local affairs, Governor Palin's op-ed continues:
"Our constitution ensures 'maximum local self-government.' Our communities have had the option to adopt building codes for decades. Most have not done so."
"I've served as a city councilman and city mayor/manager. I've participated firsthand in the mandated building code debate. Anyone serving in local office knows strong deference to local communities leads to the best policies. That policy holds true with building codes."
Despite state legislators' protests to the contrary, the governor says the federal energy dollars would have come with strings attached:
"The stimulus law in section 410(a) (2), along with the Department of Energy's (DOE) official guidance, required certifying one of two options before Alaska could receive the energy conservation funds."
"One option said the state 'will implement' the 2009 International Energy Conservation Code for new homes and renovations; adopt a 'building energy code [that meets or exceeds Standard 90.1-2007] for commercial buildings throughout the State'; and adopt and pay for a plan of 'active' enforcement."
"I could not certify this. The Legislature did not pass a bill adopting a statewide energy building code. In addition, the federal residential building code does not allow exemptions, such as we use in Alaska. When Alaska Housing Finance Corporation funds are used, building and energy codes can be waived due to the 'high cost of implementation' in different areas of Alaska. One size does not fit all in Alaska."
"The second option for Alaska was to certify that all 'applicable units of local government that have authority to adopt building codes, will implement' the necessary energy codes and enforce them."
"I could not certify this either. Alaska communities have the right to determine for themselves whether to adopt building codes."
Gov. Palin says she asked the federal government for clarification of their position. DOE, she says, finally admitted section 410 and their previous statements were "inappropriate" for some states but still wanted her to agree to "push model codes on all Alaskan communities. I said no."
The governor warns:
"Beware of Washington, D.C. trying to cajole local community leaders to eliminate the choices Alaskans have when building or renovating homes and businesses. These new codes are so detailed they would dictate the kinds of lights that can be installed in a home in Akutan, and how thick window panes must be in Chignik."
Saying that hundreds of millions of dollars have already been budgeted for conservation, weatherization and renewable energy development, Gov. Palin pledges that her administration "will remain vigilant for Alaskans and oppose mandates or pressure to conform from Washington, D.C., bureaucrats."