I like to check if people are being consistent.
If invasions of privacy are wrong -- then who here agrees with the one-month suspension without pay of the wonderful woman who illegally accessed "Joe the Plumber's" records and, to add a cherry on top, illegally used the State of Ohio's computers to organize and promote Obama?
I think it's not enough; I also think invading privacy is bad.
So, let's see if people are consistent -- will she get the same level of condemnation and calls for her head as we've seen in other places? Consider the hue and cry that went up about requiring people to get warrants after the fact of bugging/wire-tapping.
Frankly -- this is why so many people work in government folks. You can BREAK the law, and get a vacation.