Video here, and I’m looking for an embed [Got it!], but here’s the transcript:
I am told, Maggie, that the way McCain got involved in this in the first place, the Treasury Secretary was briefing Republicans in the House yesterday, the Republican conference, asked how many were ready to support the bailout plan. Only four of them held up their hands. Paulson then called, according to my sources, Senator Lindsey Graham, who is very close to John McCain, and told him: you’ve got to get the people in the McCain campaign, you’ve got to convince John McCain to give these Republicans some political cover. If you don’t do that, this whole bailout plan is going to fail. So that’s how, McCain, apparently, became involved.
He has gotten what he wants, he’s going to have this meeting, kind of a summit today with the president and Barack Obama. I’m told that the leaders of both parties are getting close to having some kind of a bill. The question, though, is whether rank-and-file Republicans, especially, are going to vote for this. A couple of thoughts:
First off, if true this completely changes our understanding of yesterday’s decision. It would certainly explain why nobody saw this announcement coming: they didn’t know. It also means that my own guess that this was part of some sort of machinations by the McCain campaign was off the mark. They were simply reacting – immediately, comprehensively, and with no overriding regard to their personal gain – to a crisis.
Second, at this rate we might as well let Senator Obama kick Senator Reid in the testicles whenever Senator Obama likes: at this moment, in the game of relevant weighting a Treasury Secretary beats a Senate Majority Leader all hollow when it comes to relevant opinions on somebody’s value. So, nope, not a stunt: and as Ed put it, at 3 AM and the call was made, it was made to John McCain.
Third, the debate tomorrow is going to be epic. Not that there’s going to be any pressure, or anything.
Share on Facebook 1 1 SHARES As the work week comes to a close I can’t help but wonder what did we really learn from the past five days. For me I learned the people of New Hampshire are down right kooky. I get the whole we like Donald thing (I do not agree with it mind you but at least I understand how you | Read More »
Trump leads among those describing themselves as “very conservative,” “somewhat conservative,” “moderate” and “somewhat liberal.” John Kasich leads among the few South Carolina GOP voters who describe themselves as “very liberal.”
Share on Facebook 1 1 SHARES Last night, a Democrat was on TV and pretty much threatened to ruin everything… and surprisingly, it’s not Hillary Clinton or Bernie Sanders I’m referring to. Louisiana’s newly-seated Democratic governor, John Bel Edwards, gave an address to the state calling for new taxes to be passed by the state legislature. If he does not get those tax increases, then | Read More »
Share on Facebook 1 1 SHARES The John Weaver-led campaign strategy of John Kasich has at no point ever had any plan other than “win New Hampshire.” Kasich did not accomplish that, or even come particularly close. In fact, Kasich got almost exactly the amount of support that the John Weaver-led Jon Huntsman campaign did in 2012, and Huntsman dropped out immediately following New Hampshire. However, | Read More »
Share on Facebook 1 1 SHARES Republicans have pretty thoroughly repudiated Richard Nixon by this point. We’re less friendly with China, we’re less friendly to creating new agencies like EPA, and we sure aren’t breaking into Democrat offices. Importantly, starting with Ronald Reagan, and continuing with George W. Bush, we recognized that when we face ideological actors, sometimes Realpolitik doesn’t have all the answers. So | Read More »