But 212 representatives voted no. A handful of these no votes came from representatives who considered the bill too weak, but most rejected the bill because they rejected the whole notion that we have to do something about greenhouse gases.
And as I watched the deniers make their arguments, I couldn’t help thinking that I was watching a form of treason — treason against the planet.
Now, I'm not one who would normally get into a man's religious beliefs, but any faith that requires you to anathematize what was at last count 40% of the population* as 'traitors to the planet' seems to be a very silly faith for a pundit to have, or at least espouse openly. For extra irony? I'll bet you that if and when Krugman gets muttering drunk, one of his favorite topics of slurred discussion is probably a tirade on the subject of the perfidy of fundamentalist Christians.
PS: Sister Toldjah has more at the link on the topics on the peculiarities of Krugman's faith, the sudden permissibility of defining dissent as treason, and this administration's own War on Science. No reason to reproduce her work.
*Some will no doubt take some comfort from the thought that the omens favor them this month. Alas, they can't pass massive tax bills that nobody's read every month... well, they can, but they'd be stupid to.
Crossposted to Moe Lane.