It apparently doesn't excite his interest either way:
U.S. Sen. Jon Tester said that a so-called "public option" in the health care bill is optional for him - and said he is not yet committed to backing the plan being put together by U.S. Sen. Max Baucus.
Tester said Wednesday he could envision voting for a health care reform bill with or without the option that would let the uninsured buy into a Medicare type government program.
"I don't need it either way," Tester told The Associated Press between meetings with constituents. "I could either support it or not support it. It's all in the design."
Via @seanhackbarth. This is actually worse news for health care rationing proponents than if Tester was adamantly opposed to public/government option; it demonstrates that not only is he indifferent to what many progressive Democrats consider to be a make-or-break part of the bill... but Tester thinks that he can get away with saying so in public. Which he probably can, at that.
Honestly, the sooner that the other side simply admits that government option is off the table, the better; it's keeping us from discussing the minimum level of tort reform and cross-state insurance availability needed in the final bill before Republicans will seriously consider voting for it...
Crossposted to Moe Lane.