Lying, in fact, is the best-case scenario. What happened is that Dick Blumenthal, when asked point-blank whether he supported cap-and-trade, told a constituent ‘no.’ Surprisingly unambiguously, as the video below shows:
Note the ‘cap-and-trade is dead’ bit: it’ll be important later.
This is no doubt a bit of a surprise for people following along, given that Blumenthal was already trying to explain away his support for the infamous HR 2454 cap and trade House bill last year: his campaign is already angrily trying to argue that support for this should not be categorized (as the Linda McMahon campaign happily did) as support for an ‘energy tax’ (even though that’s pretty much what cap-and-trade is). Even if you do accept that argument of Blumenthal’s, he is on the record as being a cap-and-trade supporter: specifically, HR 2454. Blumenthal specifically wrote to the same Senate that he’s now trying to join, calling for that legislation to be passed. This is a matter of objective reality.
So, what’s going on?
Well, one of three things. One, Dick Blumenthal’s too dumb to realize that there’s a difference between claiming that there’s a difference between cap-and-trade and an energy tax, and claiming that he never supported cap-and-trade in the first place. Two, Dick Blumenthal’s too dumb to realize that every conservative/Republican political activist in the United States of America now has a video camera. Then there’s three: when Blumenthal implied that ‘cap-and-trade is dead’ was his reason for no longer supporting the legislation, he meant it. Which would mean that he never supported cap-and-trade in the first place; Dick Blumenthal was just pandering to Connecticut voters by telling them what he thought that they wanted to hear.
Honestly? If I were a progressive, I think that I would prefer either answer #1 or #2. Because then at least I wouldn’t be the one being lied to.
Share on Facebook 1 1 SHARES Last night after the debate, CNN continued their embarrassing butt-covering campaign regarding the Carsongate fiasco. The essential issue in this story is that the people who are attacking Ted Cruz on this (including Ben Carson) are intentionally conflating a series of tweets that were sent by CNN reporter Chris Moody, and what was said on air by CNN anchors Jake Tapper | Read More »
Share on Facebook 1 1 SHARES In the spin room last night, Donald Trump was stopped by CNN and asked, among other things, if he had learned from Iowa that he needed to have a strong ground game to succeed in New Hampshire. Trump’s answer indicated that he still rejects the notion that a ground game is important at all, even in small states when | Read More »
Share on Facebook 1 1 SHARES Sen. Ted Cruz won the New Hampshire GOP debate. Cruz managed to stay above the hand to hand combat between the desperate governors and Sen Marco Rubio and Donald Trump. He gave great answers to the ABC News moderators, some of whom spent the night fishing for sound bites that could be used to help the Democrats’ eventual nominee. | Read More »
Share on Facebook 1 1 SHARES The story of tonight’s New Hampshire debate will probably be about Marco Rubio – but we don’t know yet what that story will be, because the post-debate spin may be more important than what actually happened. Rubio had some very good and bad moments tonight. Unfortunately for him, the bad ones were early, they were ugly and they were | Read More »
Share on Facebook 1 1 SHARES “On abortion, the Democrats are extremists.” Every Republican and conservative in America knows the media’s double standards when it comes to asking hard questions. It was especially evident this week in the difference between the Democrat and Republican debates. And it is the most evident in how the media deal with abortion. Sen. Rubio takes them apart over it. | Read More »