[UPDATE]: Update to this story here. It's a bit long to just paste onto here, so let me summarize: Sen. Paul is indicating that he was kept in a cubicle for at least an hour and a half and that the TSA turned out not to need him to do a mandatory pat-down after all. To me it sounds like a detention, and I will continue to have a problem with that when it comes to a US Senator.
The Daily Caller reports: the short version is, the TSA in Nashville detained Senator Rand Paul (R, KY) after their body scanner went on the fritz and the Senator refused to submit to a full-body pat-down. Senator Paul was scheduled to speak to March for Life this morning as part of their anniversary rally against Roe v. Wade: it's now an open question whether he's going to be able to, now. As somebody noted to me privately: if this was any other Senator you could reasonably expect grandstanding, but Senator Paul is precisely the sort of person who will stubbornly force the TSA to embarrass itself by detaining a Senator on a matter of personal liberty. Particularly since Senator Paul's ongoing opposition to full-body pat-downs is quite well known.
In other words: this is what civil disobedience looks like.
Moe Lane (crosspost)
PS: By the way? As ABC News is actually pointing out, Senators have the following Constitutionally enumerated right: "They shall in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same;"(Article I, Section 6). Senate's in session today; so let's see, once and for all, whether Harry Reid's a true Senator, or just this administration's lap dog...