NFL’s “Rush” to Judgment: The New “Acceptable” Discrimination
In the post-partisan post-racial America led by former ACORN community organizer and Nobel Peace Prize Winner (those two are one and the same are they not?) Barack Hussein Obama, discrimination has become the law of the land. The man fighting for “social justice” and “fundamental change” of America is doing his best to coordinate efforts on all fronts to institutionalize racism and discrimination of any and all dissidents.
Rush Limbaugh’s treatment in the past week over the now-defunct deal to buy the St. Louis Rams was just one glaring example of the new “acceptable” discrimination.
Limbaugh’s alleged “racist rants” were an invention of Wikipedia. The clowns (see also liberal propagandists) who attributed those quotes to Limbaugh, did so without any evidence or proof whatsoever. It was simply, “Rush is a racist. He wanted to kill Martin Luther King himself. He owns his own slaves. He lynches people. And so on and so forth.”
The blithering idiots in the media simply parroted these blatant lies because they served their ultimate goal, journalistic integrity. Oh that’s right, journalistic integrity was cut out of the curriculum in journalism 101 (and in order to appease dictators, communists and other mind-controlling thugs who would be offended by the term “integrity.”) So the clowns in the media fact-checked this story like Dan Rather and Mary Mapes did for the Bush AWOL story of 2004. No sources? Ah, we all know it’s true because everyone we know thinks it is and hates Limbaugh. Run with it.
Using those standards, the following can now be taken as fact:
Barack Obama is a hermaphrodite.
John Kerry hates Jews.
Hillary Clinton is a Soviet spy.
Nancy Pelosi hates children and puppies.
The reality of the Limbaugh situation is that this is but one example of a larger “scheme” by the menacing liberal overlords to silence the opposition. Limbaugh never said any of the nonsense attributed to him. Many of the journalists (from the Washington Post and CNN among others) have finally admitted that they have no proof about the accusations against Limbaugh. Of course, they knew that before they ran the story. They knew what they were “reporting” was making news, not reporting it, and that’s the way they like it. Their intention all along was to savage and de-humanize Limbaugh in the eyes of America and thus negate anything that the man says. They could print and report
retractions after the fact, knowing full well that the damage would already be done.
If this strategy sounds familiar, it should. The same strategy was and is still employed against Sarah Palin, her husband, her children, her grandson, her extended family, her neighbors, her former employers/employees, her church, her town, her state, her successor, and everyone in between.
The same strategy is used against Fox News and anyone affiliated with it.
The same strategy was used against Senator George Allen of Virginia.
The same strategy was used against Senator Trent Lott.
The same strategy was used against (insert conservative name here.)
And yes, the same strategy was used to great effect against the 43rd President of the United States, (non Nobel Peace Prize Winner) George W. Bush. His anemic 20 something percent favorability (and subsequent “non-racist” booing and taunting (largely by black folks to a white president) at Obama’s inauguration were proof positive of the success of the Alinsky affect.
The great “race” accusations are not actually about race at all. They are about mind-control. They are about destroying your political opponent because you can’t respond coherently to their arguments. It’s about propaganda, censorship, and the death of Jeffersonian governance pure and simple.
If it were about race, would the specters of “Reverend” Al Sharpton and “Reverend” Jesse Jackson really surface as the arbiters of good and evil in the world of racism and discrimination?
“Reverend” Al Sharpton, while funny on SNL, was “not racist” when he intentionally falsely accused a federal prosecutor (white guy) of rape in the 1987 Tawana Brawley (black woman) case. Sharpton was also “not racist” when he appeared in the sequel to that smash hit and sided with the Duke University “rape victim” against her white “assailants.” He even went so far as to decry “racism” in the media for doubting the lying opportunist’s ever-changing story.
Our pal Jackson is famous for threatening to cut the nuts off of Nobel Peace Prize Winner Barack Hussein Obama, but also for anti-semitic rants labeling Jews “hymies” and New York City “hymie town.” Apparently anti-semitism is like the n-word in that it is not racist if a liberal or black person utters it. Only when truly “racist” white or conservative folks say it, does it indeed carry the weight of racism.
The countless racist remarks or cartoons made against Condi Rice, Clarence Thomas and other minority conservatives are overlooked in the quest to eradicate racism. So apparently is lifelong service to the KKK as the celebrated status of Democratic Senator Robert “KKK” Byrd would seem to suggest. In fact, references to conservative blacks as “Uncle Toms” or “Aunt Jemimas” seem to be celebratory appellations hardly worthy of any condemnation:
Liberal radio host John Sylvester called Condoleezza Rice “Aunt Jemima” and Colin Powell “Uncle Tom” on his program Thursday, Nov 18, 2004. No apology was given to either person (although a half-hearted “apology” was offered to listeners who were offended.)
A Daily Kos post by not-racist “Soj” refers to Colin Powell as “Uncle Tom” on April 12, 2004.
Crazed Socialist whack-job Harry Belafonte referred to Colin Powell as a “house slave” on a San Diego radio program on October 17, 2002.
Liberal columnist Carl Rowan on Clarence Thomas: “if you give Thomas a little flour on his face, you’d think you had [former Klansman] David Duke.”
Willie Brown on Thomas: “A man whose views are ‘legitimizing of the Ku Klux Klan…”Thomas should be reduced to talking only to white conservatives,” and “must be shut out by the black community.”
Film director Spike Lee on Clarence Thomas: “biscuit and gravy eating Uncle Tom.”
Columnist Julianne Malveaux told a television audience on November 4, 1994, “I hope [Thomas’s] wife feeds him lots of eggs and butter, and he dies early, like many black men do, of heart disease. . . .He’s an absolutely reprehensible person.”
A simple google search for any prominent conservative will find racist comments against minorities like Rice & Thomas (which are again acceptable if directed by a liberal) and allegations of racism against white conservatives. After all, as the wise sage Kanye West once said “George Bush doesn’t care about black people.” That’s why he tried so hard to keep his blowing up of the levees in New Orleans a secret. His goal to drown as many blacks as possible was to remain as secret as his blowing up of the World Trade Center on 9/11 with the aid of Reverend Wright’s feared nemesis, “them Jews.”
Liberal folks make no attempt to engage in serious policy debate with conservatives because common sense is not on their side. Running a massive deficit? Our solution says to spend more money! Have terrorists at war with you? Our solution says demonize American soldiers, reduce our arsenal, don’t use offensive monickers like “war” and retreat! (After all, we have those oceans to keep us safe!)
So, the tactic for any liberal in politics has to be to destroy your opponent. If you can succeed in dehumanizing your opponent, you can discredit them. Then you don’t have to contend with their argument. If you destroy their reputation, you destroy their credibility. Saul Alinsky has trained these modern radicals very well indeed.
So liberals elevate personal destruction to an art form, even while decrying the politics of personal destruction. The most powerful weapon they have in the arsenal is the “racist” card because people are so fearful of being called a racist that they clam up and apologize for things that aren’t even true in an attempt to curry favor with race-baiting hate-mongers like “Reverends” Jackson and Sharpton.
This summer, the tea party participants were branded as “racists” by eloquent vision of beauty Janeane Garofalo. No evidence was cited, but clearly everyone concerned about higher taxes, is primarily motivated by blind racist fury. Evidence is not needed when charges of racism or racist remarks are uttered by liberals against conservatives. Conservatives are big fat racists. Everyone knows it. Don’t press us for specifics.
Sure, some of the nicer liberals won’t go that far. They’ll just change the subject to one of their other talking points and refuse to answer your question or debate your winning point on any given issue. Thus a discussion on taxes turns with a dismissive “we’re not talking about taxes” (even though they were) and the liberal propagandist launches into a diatribe about the environment or the War in Iraq.
Most, however, are just that vindictive, and as Limbaugh himself stated about this line of attack, “These intimidation tactics are working and spreading, and they are a cancer on our society.” This is a problem, and not just because a few actors and journalists are doing it. It is so widespread that the tactic reaches all the way to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Make no mistake, the de-humanizing Alinsky-inspired attacks like the faux “racist” charges are ones that the Obama administration pushes, promotes and uses to their advantage. Now doubt learning a great deal from ACORN and his spiritual mentor Reverend Wright, Obama has discovered that being a black liberal, he is doubly immune to charges of racism himself. Therefore, he can send out the character assassination folks with an arrogant sense of impunity. Well, there’s that and the fact that most journalists spend more time fantasizing about him in bed than actually doing their job of objectively reporting the news.
Playing a large part in the Limbaugh “racism” story was the NFL Players’ Association. Did you know, by the way, that the NFL Players‘ Association Executive Director, DeMaurice Smith, was a counselor for Attorney General Eric Holder? (Holder, who inexplicably canned the federal investigation of the black panthers‘ intimidation at a Philadelphia polling place is clearly not a racist.) He also served on the Obama transition team. He is one of the driving forces behind getting Limbaugh out of the NFL team-buying business AND he has some very serious ties to Obama. Surely that is just a coincidence. Obama after all, is the king of coincidence. Nothing is his fault and nothing is as it seems. He can have a thousand communist czars working for him and yet have nothing to do with communism himself. He can attend a racist church and yet not adhere to its tenets (or indeed even know of them.) He can intimately work for ACORN and not have any idea who or what they are. Coincidences abound in Obama’s world and this is clearly just another one of them.
Another such coincidence occurred in the sourcing of the Wikipedia entires claiming that Rush said all kinds of racist things. Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, a New York law firm, has been confirmed as the source of the “Rush is a racist” entries on Wikipedia. The law firm handles sports disputes and legal proceedings such as those that are common to the NFL Players’ Association. A simple search of the firm’s clients will likely reveal a connection to our Obama pal Smith. Of course, that too will be merely a coincidence. Anyone who would suggest otherwise is a racist.
The NFL “rush” to judgment was nothing more than another victory for liberal propagandists. Their false accusations of racism and Alinsky-inspired character assassinations of successful and effective conservatives will continue so long as the American people allow it to and conservatives bow to the false accusations in hopes of getting along with these scoundrels. Conservatives, and indeed Americans, need more Rush Limbaughs willing to take on the lies and censorship of the hateful and racist left-wing propagandists. Limbaugh, Palin, Beck, Hannity and any other demonized figure of the right does America a service with each hit they return to the other side. Their bold stand against such dishonest propagandists protects our precious American freedom of speech for one more day. It is a fight for the soul of a nation and the ideal of the free speech and expression so vital to our way of life and governance.
It is, however, a fight that needs to be taken up by more than just a brave few. Every American “needs a little skin in the game” so to speak.
For in life, a bully is only really deterred by force. This is, of course, in contrast to Nobel Peace Prize Winner Barack Obama’s fantasy world where bullies begin skipping and holding hands with their victims as soon as they smile at them and hand them their lunch money. Bullies only mend their ways when they are put in their place. Today’s menacing liberal overlords will only be thwarted by a substantial show of conservative bravery. More good folks need to “go rogue” and make these liberal harbingers of socialism abandon the sacred doctrine of Alinsky. Bold conservatives in today’s day and age must truly live out the mantra of our Founding Fathers in pledging their “lives” their “fortunes” and their “sacred honor” to the cause of freedom.
America will thank them for it.