BREAKING: Mike Pence Officially Makes His Endorsement
This is huge news. Pence is universally known in Indiana and is by far the biggest Republican name in the state.Read More »
Talk about the law of unintended consequences.
Chuck Schumer, Harry Reid and Barney Frank are outraged over the $165 million in bonuses paid to the executives at AIG. They and other in Congress are pushing for new legislation that will single-out the AIG execs to get the money back.
According to some, that’s a bad idea:
Not only would Congress be retroactively meddling with contractual agreements, they say, but it would be passing laws that would essentially target a specific group of employees.
Jonathan Turley, George Washington University law professor, said targeting those employees through taxes would invite a valid court challenge.
“It could well trigger years of litigation,” he said. “Just because a company or individual is unpopular does not mean the government can retroactively impose punitive measures against them. … There’s a host of difficult contractual and constitutional and statutory barriers that would have to be overcome by Congress.”
Two of those difficulties, lawyers say, lie in Article I of the U.S. Constitution — a section stating Congress cannot pass any “Bill of Attainder” or “ex post facto” law.
A Bill of Attainder is an act of the legislature that singles out and punishes a group or individual without trial. An ex post facto law retroactively changes the legal consequences of an act.
I’m just as upset as anyone else that taxpayer money is being used to pay these bonuses. I’m angry that I pay so much in taxes (so much that I have trouble paying off my debts), yet my tax dollars are lining the pockets of executives at a company that should have gone bankrupt.
Unlike others, I direct my anger at those who are responsible: Every member of Congress , who decided to meddle in the free market instead of allowing existing bankruptcy laws to take over. Bankruptcy law that would have allowed a judge to cancel these bonus contracts, by the way.
If Barney Frankie, Chucky Schumer, Prince Harry and all the rest of them couldn’t forsee this outcome, they have no business being in Washington. After all, AIG had contractual obligations, in the form of compensation. If AIG hadn’t paid out these bonuses, the company could have been subject to litigation from the jilted executives.
As Neal Boortz pointed out in his talking points today, since AIG is based in Connecticut, these executives could have sued the company for double their promised compensation, or $330 million instead of just $165 million, plus their legal fees.
So instead of a bankruptcy judge cancelling these compensation plans, $165 million in taxpayer dollars are being pocketed by executives at a failed corporation.
And I think it was planned.
Oh, of course I have no proof, but let’s paint by numbers:
Can you see the future? I can. I see an America where we all live by the government’s leave.
No. Thank. You.
Actually, I’m probably wrong. I’m arguing that Chucky Schumer, Barney Frankie, Prince Harry and PrezBO are actually capable of such foresight, collaboration and the ability to conspire. I’m not convinced they’re even self aware, let alone intelligent.