Everyone knows that I am a Perry voter and I don't try to hide it or use subliminal messaging to get my candidates name out there. So instead of trying to hedge my bets after reading the news this morning- I'm going to come right out and say it. We are in DEEP TROUBLE in this country if we continue with this conservative bloodletting, while Mitt Romney sits like a catbird above the fray and his idiotic minions work behind the scenes to sow chaos and move the primary dates up.
Via Hot Air, there is now an article out showing that Mitt Romney worked with John Holdren to craft his EPA policy as governor. As a matter of fact, the entire memo, announcing Mitt's policy is located at Hot Air.com. I don't know how to imbed links or I would have. Just a precursory glance at this memo should raise the hackles on the back of your neck. To sum it up, it is precisely the exact same EPA policy that Obama is pushing now nationally and what a small,small world it is, when we can see that Mitt used Holdren and Obama also now has him as one of his czars. Romneycare=Obamacare, and now we can add Romney's EPA policy=Obama's EPA policy. Mitt is one of those firm believers in AGW-right along with Christie, and just recently, I watched a video where Mitt did some sort of press conference screaming at the camera that a factory in Mass was KILLING people. How many more hints do we need that Mitt is NOT a conservative-in fact is not even a republican? How many more slaps across the face? How many more excuses must we make to ourselves that"oh, it's just because it was Mass. you see and he had to work with a liberal legislature?" Need to be scared a little more? Let's look into John Holdren and his lovely wife-both of whom work for and with the Center for American Progress (Van Jones's new gig too-as I said ,small world...),Think Progress, and George Soros.
John Holdren, whom Barack Obama has recently appointed Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology -- informally known as the United States' Science Czar. In a book Holdren co-authored in 1977-named, Ecoscience, the man now firmly in control of science policy in this country wrote that:
• Women could be forced to abort their pregnancies, whether they wanted to or not;
• The population at large could be sterilized by infertility drugs intentionally put into the nation's drinking water or in food;
• Single mothers and teen mothers should have their babies seized from them against their will and given away to other couples to raise;
• People who "contribute to social deterioration" (i.e. undesirables) "can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility" -- in other words, be compelled to have abortions or be sterilized.
• A transnational "Planetary Regime" should assume control of the global economy and also dictate the most intimate details of Americans' lives -- using an armed international police force.
Think he couldn't have possibly said these things? Wrong, every one of them is a direct quote from his own book for example:
Page 787-8: Mass sterilization of humans though drugs in the water supply is OK as long as it doesn't harm livestock
|Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.|
OK, John, now you're really starting to scare me. Putting sterilants in the water supply? While you correctly surmise that this suggestion "seems to horrify people more than most proposals," you apparently are not among those people it horrifies. Because in your extensive list of problems with this possible scheme, there is no mention whatsoever of any ethical concerns or moral issues. In your view, the only impediment to involuntary mass sterlization of the population is that it ought to affect everyone equally and not have any unintended side effects or hurt animals. But hey, if we could sterilize all the humans safely without hurting the livestock, that'd be peachy! The fact that Holdren has no moral qualms about such a deeply invasive and unethical scheme (aside from the fact that it would be difficult to implement) is extremely unsettling and in a sane world all by itself would disqualify him from holding a position of power in the government. (h/t to Zombie news). Holdren is also on the record as wanting to give animals ,insects, and plants the right to sue in court. What the he!! is Mitt Romney, a CONSERVATIVE right?, even DOING 100 feet from a man with these ideals??????????/-this book was written in 1977! There is no way he was not aware of this, Harvard prof or not! Now let's look at his dear wife Dr. Cheryl E. Holdren,bio scientist extraordinaire from...wait for it...Harvard-of course! The good Dr is involved in bio engineering ,through sterilization and population control, insects and butterflies- or at least so far anyway.. This married couple actually believes in global population control via either forced abortion, or sterilizing against their knowledge or will"undesirables" such as handicapped or mentally retarded people. Presumably that would mean with both sexes. They believe that single mothers should have their babies forcibly taken away to be raised by older more mature couples. That is not an exaggeration or hyperbole-it is directly quoted in his book. Please visit www.zombieland/JohnHoldren and read the entire article which details minutely everything I have stated here. The author has tabbed and cross tabbed extensively so you can really see for yourself. Caution though, make sure to drink a nice long swig of pepto before reading,because you will be sick to your stomach by the time you are finished.
This brings me to the point of this diary- we simply cannot allow these kind of freaks anywhere near having control over our lives through D.C. Yes, I am aware that Holdren is currently Obama's science czar, but because he is under a progressive president, we keep an eagle eye on all of this egotistical know it all's movements. Imagine should we have a pseudo-conservative President Romney and he sneaks Holdren in through the back door, or WORSE, simply just keeps him in place? Why wouldn't he? He's already worked with him in the past for pete's sake! That is a chance I am unwilling to take.
We cannot allow an AGW believer the keys to the white house and the ability to craft EO's giving the EPA and scum like Holdren more control over ours or our children's lives. The AGW scam will be the undoing of us as a country. There are currently two believers in AGW who are being pushed at us as top tier candidates for President-Romney and Cain. Romney hems and haws but we have a record to judge him by and really he passed quite a few laws that cannot be walked back. Cain is more of a stealth AGW believer, or at least that is the conclusion I draw considering he sat on the board of directors of Avila, which was a "green" company that sold carbon and energy shares to it's employees-Enron style. And Enron style, it too went belly up , causing it's employees to lose everything and later sue in a class action lawsuit-which was settled out of court for an undisclosed sum of money. If Herman is not a believer in AGW, why would he sit on the board of a company that did and swindled it's employees? Either he didn't believe in it, but sat on the board just for the money knowing it was a scam, or he DOES believe in AGW and didn't think it was a scam, but still wanted to make some money(capitalist-I have no problem with that) but he can't have it both ways. Not willing to take a chance on that one.
Newt we all know is a proponent of AGW, Bachmann is a definite NO, but has no shot at winning and Paul is nuts. That leaves Perry, who is a very loud and aggressive opponent of the EPA. he has a long and consistent record of fighting them tooth and nail in Texas-in fact his new energy plan spells that out pretty clearly. he wants to repeal The clean Air act that gave them so much power over things that have nothing to do with Clean Air at all. Perry is not just talking out of both sides of his mouth, he can and has backed up everything he has claimed in this scenario.
is he perfect-nope, and he really shouldn't be if we are honest, but does he have the right recipe for our country. Yes. Mitt has demonstrated ,once again that he a.) can't be trusted,b.) has no judgement of long term consequences and c.) as Rush said Thurs.- he is NOT a conservative, but a blue dog dem at best and a progressive hiding in moderate clothing like Obama at worst.
The RINO establishment is trying to work behind the scenes to force Romney on us,betting we will vote for him even though we don't want him because we don't want Obama. This is their perfect chance to get a more "sophisticated,realistic.reasonable" so called Republican into office at the helm. He believes in the same things they believe in and they've decided for us- our opinions are quaint, but unwanted. Us well meaning citizens are being led by the nose via NRO,and the rest of the establishment, TOWARDS a candidate (Cain) who everyone knows does not have the money,experience,or even campaign staff to win the nomination and AWAY from the candidate who can (Perry) who has the experience,money,campaign structure and record to win not only the nomination but the general. We are willing suckers in their little Versailles like plot to plant little hit pieces ,put out concern trolls,talking heads like York and Trinko to create the narrative. Who decided these people had any say? Stop reading their crap,stop watching their crap,stop buying their crap and make your decision based on your common sense and gut.I made a joke once that wouldn't it be hysterically if at the ballot box we were handed a memo outlining each candidates actual record in office,his votes,statements,planks he ran on and the ones he actually put into practice and the people he surrounded himself with,his budget shortfalls or windfalls,etc,etc. There would be no names, just an option A and an option B,etc, no pictures, just a vote for his/her record and stances. Would sure save a lot on campaigning and we'd see pretty quickly which side our country was on ideology wise. No need for talking heads, or campaign activists masking themselves as journalists.
Let's stop the bloodletting amongst conservatives and hold Romney's feet to the fire. The candidates who refuse to do that will have shown their cards, the ones who challenge him hard will be the ones to watch. Those would be the ones to coalesce around. To date, the ONLY one I've seen do that in any meaningful way is Perry. So we either continue with the sniping or put the gun down,quit participating with the media's little game and force Romney to defend himself. It's either beat them at their own snotty game, or watch Romney waltz right in. "The science is settled "you see, just ask Mitt Romney and John Holdren.