The Obama Scandals Aren’t About Bad Government, but Big Government
When scandal rocks any administration, its partisan opponents smell blood in the water and move in to inflict as much political damage on the president as possible.
Consultants assure us it’ll “gin up the base.” It makes headlines. And it’s always easy to kick someone when he’s down.
But for conservatives, especially in the case of the various scandals enveloping the Obama Administration this month, it’s also unwise.
For these scandals present conservatives a much greater opportunity than the chance to win a few news cycles or claim a few bureaucratic scalps.
The ballooning Obama scandals – IRS, HHS, DOJ, EPA – are not really about character or competence, but the danger of big government itself.
The more power any government has, the more power it will abuse. The more money it spends, the more money it will mis-spend. Dysfunction and corruption grow on government like mold on otherwise perfectly good bread.
It has nothing to do with party or ideology – it has to do with human nature.
This is one of the fundamental tenets of conservatism, and one of the hardest to communicate past the credulous liberalism of the mainstream media. Yet thisweek, the media and the Obama Administration are making the case for us.
President Obama’s political guru David Axelrod himself said yesterday that, “Part of being president is there’s so much beneath you that you can’t know because the government is so vast.”
James Madison could not have said it better himself!
These scandals shine a light on the inherent flaw of the progressive ideology: the idea that government can and should be trusted with more and more power, because it alone can wield that power in the disinterested pursuit of the common good.
This week, the Obama administration’s words are being impeached by the administration’s deeds.
With the possible exception of the Benghazi cover-up, all of the recent Obama scandals do not so much impeach the president’s character; they indict his worldview.
And his agenda.
The president’s entire program is based on giving more and more power to the same executive branch agencies demonstrating themselves this week to either be criminally incompetent or tyrannically corrupt.
Obamacare? Expanded gun background checks? Comprehensive immigration reform? They’re all based on competent collection and ethical use of personal information coerced from the American people by the federal bureaucracy.
Today it’s your 501(c)4 application; tomorrow it’s your medical records.
Rather than chasing mid-level scapegoats, conservatives – especially elected conservatives – should be communicating the lessons of the Obama scandals to delay, defund, and repeal Obamacare, and to cut the huge Gang of Eight immigration bill down to a series of smaller, manageable, incremental reforms.
Perhaps even more importantly, conservatives need to take this opportunity to communicate how civil society and the free market can and would do a better job delivering the services government monopolizes.
AnAmerica without HHS shakedowns and EPA cronyism would not only enjoy more honest government, but also better, more affordable health care and a cleaner environment.
Congress should absolutely get to the bottom of these various scandals. And the American people should absolutely be outraged.
But we should not be surprised that a $3.7 trillion government is corrupt. What should surprise us is that anyone would expect a $3.7 trillion government not to be.
Conservatives – and elected conservatives especially – should recognize that these scandals aren’t about Republicans versus Democrats – they’re about Washington, D.C. versus everyone else.
They’re about an entrenched, entitled political elite protecting its unearned power and privileges from accountability, whether challenged by reformers or reporters.
This is what always happens when government gets too big. The Founders knew thatover time, either the people would control the government, or the government would control the people. That’s why they bequeathed to us a constitutionally limited government – a republic, if we could keep it.