The Would-Be Senator Who Won’t Debate
US Senate candidate from Texas Ted Cruz has an opponent that’s hard to find. For over two weeks, Cruz has been asking his meek opponent, Lt. Gov David Dewhurst, for a debate. At issue is whether Dewhurst called for an income tax. Why is Dewhurst ducking a debate?
In 2006, David Dewhurst publicly supported a business income tax, as an alternative to Rick Perry’s Gross Receipts Tax, but then stepped back from that the next day to support the GRT being favored by several business groups. The Texas Constitution forbids a personal income tax, and the business tax was perilously close to that. Dewhurst had to back away from the statement. Many conservatives pushed for spending cuts, rather than tax increases.
A Gross Receipts Tax is far worse than an income tax, however. A GRT punishes businesses with high sales volume but low profit margin, also punishing with higher prices the customers of those businesses. The end result of a GRT is a series of market dislocations and disruptions.
Short-sighted business leaders supported a GRT because it would have lowered their immediate tax burden, given the other tax changes the state was about to make. The savings would have quickly disappeared, however, as revenue-hungry spenders in the legislature found new ways to dispose of the money they already received through the GRT.
But as early as 2005, Dewhurst had supported a “wage tax”, which would have taxed employers based on the wages they paid. The Wall Street Journal called that an income tax, which again is unconstitutional in Texas..
Fast forward to 2012, and Ted Cruz wants Dewhurst to explain the difference between a wage tax and in income tax.
I wonder when David Dewhurst will debate Ted Cruz. Senators should be willing and able to debate anyone.
According to economist former Majority Leader Dick Armey, “This is an interesting concept. Now, of course in my life I approach everything from the point of view of economics, especially when it’s about taxes.”
“When you start looking at taxes, and the nature of the tax,” Armey said, “you have to look beyond the manner in which the tax is levied. You look at the incident of the tax. What has been levied, What is the impact, and what is the behavioral response to the ‘wage tax’ is the same as to an income tax.”
Though employers can’t do what they’d like to do, which is cut wages to make their overall labor costs stay the same, without alienating their workforce, “The employer will pass it on in future pay,” he said.
Whether state government taxes an employer before the worker gets the money or the worker afterward, it’s all money the employer would rather give to his people. “When the cost of labor goes up,” Armey said, “it means less labor.”
But now Ted Cruz has been asking, these last two weeks, for a debate with Dewhurst over whether the “wage tax” is actually an income tax.
Q: How do you get David Dewhurst to ignore you and hide in fear? A: Point out that he supported an income tax, and ask for a debate. #txsen