What justifies 9/11 and Islamist terrorism against the United States?
Mentally unstable guys putting their trucks into mosques 10 years ago in Florida… that’s what.
Of course, that’s the point the Virginia Anti-Shariah Task Force chief Jim Lafferty was making at a rather warm (someone turned the air conditioning off in a packed room of about 150 CPAC attendees — wonder why?) presentation at CPAC this weekend.
Naturally, some Americans like Jim Lafferty take umbrage with that — and call ’em out. See below:
…and that is what has Right Wing Watch all up in a tizzy this Sunday morning. One guy… one truck… and one Jim Lafferty willing to stand up and call the Islamist apologists out on how that 2002 incident doesn’t wipe out a patter of Islamist terror against the United States.
The man who crashed his truck into a campus mosque late Monday has a history of bizarre behavior linked to Florida State University.
Charles Franklin, 41, was arrested in 1992 after he used a metal pipe to vandalize the disc-jockey booth at V89, an FSU radio station. In 1998, he was investigated for allegedly driving his van at a group of students near the Student Union, according to FSU police.
Now, he’s charged with burglary and felony criminal mischief in Monday’s attack on the Islamic Center of Tallahassee. Franklin told police he did it because he “hated Muslims” and could face additional hate-crime penalties if convicted, said Scott Hunt, Tallahassee Police Department spokesman.
Now how many cards short of a full deck is this Charles Franklin fella playing with?
Lafferty made his position clear with this earlier statement:
I do not support, encourage or condone driving a truck into any mosque or any other religious building.At CPAC, I made the same statement that I have made many times – that the slide show in the Justice Department Hate Crimes presentation focuses almost exclusively on incidents of pick-up trucks being driven into a mosque wall or exterior. None of the incidents of church or synagogue vandalism make it into the DOJ presentation.
My remark was a clumsily- worded acknowledgement that pick-up truck collisions with mosques usually occur in the South and usually involve alcohol.
I support the free exercise protections of the First Amendment to the Constitution for all religious beliefs and practices.
I am, at all times, a firm supporter of the Constitution and the rule of law. Illegal activity will eventually be investigated and prosecuted by authorities.
What was clear to the folks in the room at CPAC is that some folks “in the South” get the threat that shariah-compliance poses to American communities in the heartland. That one incidence of violence from a loon doesn’t repudiate the exhaustive pattern of terrorism, radicalization, and violence from factions of the Islamist community in the United States.
Of course, the liberal left will do everything in its power to squash and destroy conservatives — even if it’s a temporary alliance with an Islamic faith who believes the punishment for homosexuality should be death, that women have only half the say of men in society, that “good speech” should nominally replace free speech, where “freedom of worship” should replace our First Amendment freedom of religion, or that shariah does indeed trump the U.S. Constitution.
Anything for short term gain, right?
The long and short of this is that Lafferty and the 150 people packed into that room understand radical Islam and the threat of shariah law as something very different from say, the experience of Catholics over the 19th century (or perhaps, the still-ongoing experience of Catholics even today). Whereas Catholics sought to find a place in American life, the Islamist experience thus far seeks to transform American life. Whereas canon law applied for monasteries, shariah law seeks to apply itself to everyday occurrence — right down to the foods you eat.
While Catholics rightly argue for the liberty of human conscience, radical Islam — even their so-called “moderate” voices — deliberately seek to squelch those rights in favor of “hate speech” or “libel”.
Share on Facebook 1 1 SHARES lright, well, this is the part of the day where we acknowledge the fact that the whole world is going to be taking a break from politics (and everything else) to watch the Super Bowl. If you’re tuning in to RedState, feel free to chime in to the comments! Open thread! Denver to Host 2016 RedState Gathering…click here for | Read More »
Share on Facebook 1 1 SHARES In the Obama years of the Department of Homeland Security, a lot of questionable things have gone on. For example, as we’ve noted before, the DHS shut down an investigation into the terrorists who would eventually launch a deadly terror-related shooting in San Bernardino, California. We know this and more thanks to Philip Haney, a whistleblower that has made | Read More »
Share on Facebook 1 1 SHARES Big debate ratings and (in Iowa) big voter turnout have been the story of the GOP primary race so far, and despite being on a Saturday night, the New Hampshire debate on ABC was no exception: Bucking a trend of declining debate ratings, ABC’s Saturday night GOP face-off was the highest rated debate so far in 2016, according to | Read More »