Obama, a Murderer?
Something dawned on me today as I was watching Fox News coverage of the recent Benghazi hearings on Capitol Hill. On The O’Reilly Factor, Rudy Giuliani made an interesting point. Key military personnel keep saying that there were no assets in the region that could have reached the compound in time to provide aid to Ambassador Stevens and the three other Americans who lost their lives that evening. But as Giuliani said, how could they have known on the night of September 11, 2012, whether or not those assets could have arrived in time? Unless they were complicit in the attack (which I am not at all alleging), then the “not in time” excuse cannot be the real reason military assets weren’t deployed that night. In other words, how could they’ve possibly known how long the attack would last?
This got me thinking: what was the real reason that military assets weren’t deployed to assist Ambassador Stevens and the three other Americans who lost their lives that night? And the only reason I can conceive is that they were given an explicit order to stand down for nothing more than the political purposes of Barack Hussein Obama.
So, here’s my question: if it could be shown that President Obama himself gave the Stand Down orders on September 11, 2012, not because military assets couldn’t get there in time (because, as Rudy Giuliani pointed out, how could we have possibly known how long the attack would last?), but because deploying our military assets would have been politically disadvantageous during an election, and if the President gave those Stand Down orders knowing full well that it would likely mean the lives of Ambassador Stevens and three other Americans would be lost, could President Obama be impeached on the grounds of manslaughter, or perhaps even murder in the second or third degree?
In short, my question tonight is this: is Barack Hussein Obama a murderer?