Yet more violence from those racist Tea Partiers peace-loving, tolerant Democrats and their constituents.
The video documents the incident, but I will sum it up.
1) The event occurs at a PUBLIC FORUM. The moderator asks that all filming cease. The cameraman continues to film.
2) Someone tells the cameraman to stop filming. When refused on the grounds that he is exercising 1st Amendment rights at a public forum, the person (usher?) says “There’s gonna be a mess.”
3) Someone sits on the cameraman’s left and asks him to quit. Upon explaining again that he is exercising his 1st Amendment rights at a public forum, the camera is knocked down. The scuffle continues; the cameraman tells Charles McC??? that he will have to get the police to remove him and his camera off the premises. Charles looks behind the cameraman, and appears nervous. The camera is pulled away from the cameraman, exposing a man on the cameraman’s right, who punches the cameraman with the camera twice.
4) The incident is shown from another angle. Note the reactions by some in the audience (or rather, lack of: some turn their heads, but no one takes any action. (the clip is cut short as well).
Now, the argument made by Charles McC??? for banning the filming cameras is that this is private property (namely theirs). That argument should not be valid because this PUBLIC FORUM (as advertised by the hosts and the local TV station KOIN6 in Portland, OR) and wasfilmed live and streamed by that same station.
Charles McC???’s badge reads that he is a member of the African American Alliance [for Houseownership], which is a subsidiary for Mission of Peace , a housing counseling non-profit corporation affliliated with PMI Group, Inc. All three groups look legitimate (i.e, not ACORN, but serve some similar functions). Of course, one has to answer the question, why were they afraid of the camera?
No justification exists for this assault. The cameraman was a private citizen filming a public candidate at a public forum (which was being filmed by a local TV station). Charles McC??? knew he was doing wrong: he looked over and behind the cameraman to 1) see if anyone was watching the scuffle, and/or 2) making sure his compatriot was in place. This act was clearly premediated, but where’s the media outrage?
Share on Facebook 1 1 SHARES “On abortion, the Democrats are extremists.” Every Republican and conservative in America knows the media’s double standards when it comes to asking hard questions. It was especially evident this week in the difference between the Democrat and Republican debates. And it is the most evident in how the media deal with abortion. Sen. Rubio takes them apart over it. | Read More »
Share on Facebook 1 1 SHARES What a glum, drab debate. ABC clearly tried to make all the candidates look bad, and the bad blood between the candidates left over from Iowa meant that they just did not care about showing any level of solidarity against the media, as they often do. Christie successfully tore down Marco Rubio for the first hour of the debate, | Read More »
Share on Facebook 1 1 SHARES The New Hampshire debate on ABC was an absolute ****show from start to finish. However, there were a few candidates who came across as ready to lead, and there were candidates who took this debate as merely a placeholder until South Carolina and beyond. The governors on the stage, however, looked like actual grown-ups tonight. Jeb Bush finally wins | Read More »
Share on Facebook 1 1 SHARES The first half of this debate has been an absolute trainwreck. Almost everyone on the stage (with the possible exceptions of Jeb Bush and Ted Cruz) has come off as more unlikeable than they were when they started. The Federalist’s Sean Davis I think has the best summary of the first half of the debate tonight and what is | Read More »