Comments on: Quixotic Quests and Questions

By: JLenardDetroit

JLenardDetroit — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:20:23 +0000

got us (or at least, me) off on a General Mass. rant….

2 words:
Underground Wires
OR
Tesla Coils

lol

We move our water around underground, I guess we’ll just have to bazillion fold increase the cost of Power by creating massive tunnels to run all our High Power Lines in. California should go ahead and Pilot that program for us since the morons don’t want any of those pesky “wires” around that actually allow them to live in those AIR CONDITIONED homes. Frankly, I think CA should just pay “required outage.” which would be the ultimate GREEN LAW and turn off ALL POWER between Midnight and 6am…. See how well that goes lol

I like the CONTROL THE WATER concept… Republican controlled rural areas should DAM up all the Water and sell it off into the “Urban” Democrat controlled areas under “GREEN” (you know, real strict preservation/conservation) Laws/practices and ultra-high prices…. All in the name of Climate $cam - Climate $cam

+Cycles/Shift - Climate Cycles/Shifts
+AccuWeather cool trend - AccuWeather COOL trend
+Another Liberal Schmuck recognizes, too late, Failed Democrat Enviro-Terrorist policies - Comedian Paul Rodreguiz’s Family Farm dying of Man-Made (read: Dem. Policy imposed) Drought and here
+C&T excuses - How/Why MI Officials spin CAT being “okay”
+Polar Bear myth - Political Class’ diary: Polar Bear population
+Militarized Oil Drilling - using the Military to Drill (Natl. Defense Strategic issue)
+China projects - China gets the Flood/Drought Cycles preperation right
+tidal-gen - Tidal power generation (finally)
+Earth 2100 - Earth 2100 TV special (Liberal propaganda)
+Mileage Taxes - Vehicle Mileage Tax - Incremental implimentation (Electric cars only FIRST!)
+T.Boone Pikens boondoggle - TBP blows wind, not harnessing it
+GM literally goes Green? - GM to literally go Green? (Post Bankruptcy WA$TE)

By: dratpatrol

dratpatrol — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:15:12 +0000

I thought about that adjective last night, and I think I prefer to call my meanderings “circuitous”, or at worst, “circumlocutive”, but they hardly compare to how most comments on this post don’t have much to do with what I said. I’m left disconsolate at the fact that my writing must not say anything important, yet giddy at the fact that I at least inspire people to argue with each other. Ripples in the pool, grasshopper?

I have a friend out here that grew up in Mass., managed to grow up conservative, and still couldn’t explain why everyone voted for a Kennedy, even if his emblem was a “gurgling cod” from the Chappaquidick. I can’t see much hope for a state that suffers from the same liberal hegemony that California does. Believe me, conservatives are confused out here. Funny how most of our “majority” populations are in rural areas where water originates, and the liberals dominate urban areas that steal the water. Seems like a trump card for conservatives, if we don’t mind taking back our water…but water is truly a Western baliwick.

By: JLenardDetroit

JLenardDetroit — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:46:47 +0000

Going at Frank and Dodd have National implication.

I have examined some races as being “acceptable” (making an exception over another Candidate that would be more preferred) because one Candidate (they should be winnable) allows us to focus attention and funds elsewhere to other Races…. This is, IMO, an exception in the other direction worth making and going at these clowns focusing on the National value and implications. Could you imagine the focus if Palin went in for someone running against Dodd? and a side comment made in favor of “so-and-so” running against Frank?!?!?! This “targeting” would be an “ISSUES” targeting not necessarily a “Candidate” (Conservative Candidates (the Diary)) …. and we cannot gain if we don’t venture!!!!!! We should, IMO, have a few of these lofty high-value, high-profile, etc, Race Targets.

By: JLenardDetroit

JLenardDetroit — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:32:50 +0000

Tell him what he’s won Johnny lol

No-one else think it is a Battle worth having/funding?!?!?!?

just one Barney ref: CRA and the Democrat deregulation LIES

By: DONTREADONME

DONTREADONME — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 04:21:01 +0000

hell, why not everything else we tried in that darn district isn’t getting the job done, why not going just conservative for a change. I am up for it make it the stomping ground for compare and contrast.

By: JLenardDetroit

JLenardDetroit — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:50:51 +0000

just someone, ultra-Conservative would be Fantastic, just to make the point(s).

As I said, normally yes I’d be looking at: Campaign handicapping factors - Analyzing Campaign chances by more than “gut feel”. In this case, I just want a PIT-BULL we can help throw CA$H at to produce Red-Meat Ads Frank won’t be able to SHUT-UP about and make more of a JackAss (he is so appropriate in that Party for the logo) of himself he usually is. It would be great to have MULTIPLE folks in a Republican Primary for that District one with the eye on potential Electability and the other ultra-Conservative to stir it up and get the attention toward the General Election race that we might squeek out of it if someone “workable” in that District on the Republican side. Anything that helps draw in attention that Frank is actually going to be challenged and finally someone to possibly support there for all to help support.

By: JLenardDetroit

JLenardDetroit — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:42:25 +0000

Now.. I’m not suggesting someone in MA get the Forms to form a Candidate Committee to place on the Ballot a Fictional Character…. ’cause, of course, that would not be Legal…. but, what I am saying is that if such a Fictional Character, or ala ACORN some dead person from the local Graveyard, pop up on Voter Registration rolls and then onto the Ballot, I’d bet that Dead Person (or Fictional Character) would get quite a few Votes to make a point.

By: DONTREADONME

DONTREADONME — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:38:35 +0000

the person who runs against Fwank has to be someone that is not part of the power players, if we could only get the guy that makes Sam Adams to run for his seat I think we have a shot. Once again, I have to go take a look at the district draw-up because I have a feeling that the district was tailored specifically to the crazy lefty-loons that Fwank is. Dare I say it, but the Republican candidate is going to have to be liberal, in the role of a Snowe or Spector, that is how badly that district is drawn up. Anyway, if the R can caucus with the R’s during the big votes like Cap-n-trade and health insurance then I believe we have to settle for that “purge from the party” candidate for now. Now I will wait for the pans to hit me.

By: JLenardDetroit

JLenardDetroit — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:30:30 +0000

I don’t care who runs and whether they have a “shot” or not but only that it is time that we CALL OUT THIS BAFOON as such and run State-wide Ads linking him with Fannie/Freddie, the Meltdown, etc…. The Ads write themselves, we’ve all seen the YouTube embeds here at RS and they are practically ready to be cut/pasted into Campaign Ads. Going at Frank is, of course, just ploy/tactic going at ALL DEMOCRATS and their massive failings. Morph Ads should abound linking all the Clowns and linking their grossly negligent statements on the whole host of issues. There is no VRWC, just a GOOD CAMPAIGN (Notice: for Campaign Law reasons) idea/strategy being recognized and adopted in Districts all across the Country (or so it should be, IMNSHO).

By: DONTREADONME

DONTREADONME — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:11:33 +0000

I for the life of me do not understand how everyone misses the fact that his district is about as tailored as Morans district in VA. They complained about the Republicans redistricting but gee whiz who comes up with these ridiculous road maps of districts in NE.

Anyway, JLD, it looks like we may have to run the local newspaper boy to run against bwawna fwank. and that was a dis to Bwawni Fwank