<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dsea's blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/dsea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/dsea</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Watch out for the Senate proposal!</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2009/09/14/watch-out-for-the-senate-proposal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2009/09/14/watch-out-for-the-senate-proposal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 22:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a href="/dsea/">dsea </a> (<a href="/users/dsea/">Profile</a>)</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Business &#038; Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Congressmen]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[health care]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[house bill]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[investment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[market place]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Medical treatment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[senate bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dsea/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: small"><span class="uistorymessage"><strong><span style="font-family: &#34;Tahoma&#34;,&#34;sans-serif&#38;quot">Congress can&#8217;t seem to do anything without some form of a &#8220;Punitive&#8221; mindset. If they can not create a public option that pays for itself, than they should not create one. Making Insurance companies pay for this will only increase the cost of insurance.</span></strong></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &#34;Tahoma&#34;,&#34;sans-serif&#34;color;font-size: 8.5pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &#34;Tahoma&#34;,&#34;sans-serif&#34;color;font-size: 8.5pt"><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090914/ap_on_go_co/us_health_care_senate_plan;_ylt=ArmwEc0AocjfPKPfmjxhsbwGw_IE;_ylu=X3oDMTJ0MGhzM2J2BGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMDkwOTE0L3VzX2hlYWx0aF9jYXJlX3NlbmF0ZV9wbGFuBGNwb3MDNgRwb3MDNgRzZWMDeW5fdG9wX3N0b3JpZXMEc2xrA3NlbmF0ZXBsYW50bw--"><span style="color: #800080">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090914/ap_on_go_co/us_health_care_senate_plan;_ylt=ArmwEc0AocjfPKPfmjxhsbwGw_IE;_ylu=X3oDMTJ0MGhzM2J2BGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMDkwOTE0L3VzX2hlYWx0aF9jYXJlX3NlbmF0ZV9wbGFuBGNwb3MDNgRwb3MDNgRzZWMDeW5fdG9wX3N0b3JpZXMEc2xrA3NlbmF0ZXBsYW50bw&#8211;</span></a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &#34;Tahoma&#34;,&#34;sans-serif&#34;color;font-size: 8.5pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &#34;Tahoma&#34;,&#34;sans-serif&#34;color;font-size: 8.5pt">Again, the emphasis is on what best suits the cost failure within the government programs, without much regard to ordinary citizens. <span> </span>Why shouldn&#8217;t all Congressmen and Senators take a 30 to 50% pay cut and cut down on their benefits. <span> </span>Their money and benefit savings could go directly into the public option plan! It&#8217;s time for them to cough up.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &#34;Tahoma&#34;,&#34;sans-serif&#34;color;font-size: 8.5pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &#34;Tahoma&#34;,&#34;sans-serif&#34;color;font-size: 8.5pt">Tax payers already pay for those who aren&#8217;t insured through various forms. There is a tax base currently in use for this very thing. <span> </span>What is now being devised is an attempt of the Government to find ways to free up money or tax dollars (that they collect) so they can use it for other things. Those tax dollars will not be returned to, or applied for, use in cutting medical costs. You will be lulled into footing the bill for another government program that requires Medical Insurance Companies to *cover* the expense of the uninsured. This will mean higher Insurance costs for the insured.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &#34;Tahoma&#34;,&#34;sans-serif&#34;color;font-size: 8.5pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &#34;Tahoma&#34;,&#34;sans-serif&#34;color;font-size: 8.5pt">When the government talks about cutting costs, it is a reference to cutting their costs not yours. <span> </span>The agenda is always to have you pay more in order to feed their gluttony.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &#34;Tahoma&#34;,&#34;sans-serif&#34;color;font-size: 8.5pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &#34;Tahoma&#34;,&#34;sans-serif&#34;color;font-size: 8.5pt">Perhaps Nancy Pelosi could auction her $70,000 pearl necklace for the initial start up of the public option.</span></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-size: small"><span class="uistorymessage"><strong><span style="font-family: &quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&amp;quot">Congress can&#8217;t seem to do anything without some form of a &#8220;Punitive&#8221; mindset. If they can not create a public option that pays for itself, than they should not create one. Making Insurance companies pay for this will only increase the cost of insurance.</span></strong></span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color;font-size: 8.5pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color;font-size: 8.5pt"><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090914/ap_on_go_co/us_health_care_senate_plan;_ylt=ArmwEc0AocjfPKPfmjxhsbwGw_IE;_ylu=X3oDMTJ0MGhzM2J2BGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMDkwOTE0L3VzX2hlYWx0aF9jYXJlX3NlbmF0ZV9wbGFuBGNwb3MDNgRwb3MDNgRzZWMDeW5fdG9wX3N0b3JpZXMEc2xrA3NlbmF0ZXBsYW50bw--"><span style="color: #800080">http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090914/ap_on_go_co/us_health_care_senate_plan;_ylt=ArmwEc0AocjfPKPfmjxhsbwGw_IE;_ylu=X3oDMTJ0MGhzM2J2BGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMDkwOTE0L3VzX2hlYWx0aF9jYXJlX3NlbmF0ZV9wbGFuBGNwb3MDNgRwb3MDNgRzZWMDeW5fdG9wX3N0b3JpZXMEc2xrA3NlbmF0ZXBsYW50bw&#8211;</span></a></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color;font-size: 8.5pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color;font-size: 8.5pt">Again, the emphasis is on what best suits the cost failure within the government programs, without much regard to ordinary citizens. <span> </span>Why shouldn&#8217;t all Congressmen and Senators take a 30 to 50% pay cut and cut down on their benefits. <span> </span>Their money and benefit savings could go directly into the public option plan! It&#8217;s time for them to cough up.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color;font-size: 8.5pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color;font-size: 8.5pt">Tax payers already pay for those who aren&#8217;t insured through various forms. There is a tax base currently in use for this very thing. <span> </span>What is now being devised is an attempt of the Government to find ways to free up money or tax dollars (that they collect) so they can use it for other things. Those tax dollars will not be returned to, or applied for, use in cutting medical costs. You will be lulled into footing the bill for another government program that requires Medical Insurance Companies to *cover* the expense of the uninsured. This will mean higher Insurance costs for the insured.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color;font-size: 8.5pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color;font-size: 8.5pt">When the government talks about cutting costs, it is a reference to cutting their costs not yours. <span> </span>The agenda is always to have you pay more in order to feed their gluttony.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color;font-size: 8.5pt"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><span style="font-family: &quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;color;font-size: 8.5pt">Perhaps Nancy Pelosi could auction her $70,000 pearl necklace for the initial start up of the public option.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2009/09/14/watch-out-for-the-senate-proposal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Is the 1st paragraph to Dead Bones Rise. (didn&#8217;t copy right)</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2009/03/18/this-is-the-1st-paragraph-to-dead-bones-rise-didnt-copy-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2009/03/18/this-is-the-1st-paragraph-to-dead-bones-rise-didnt-copy-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a href="/dsea/">dsea </a> (<a href="/users/dsea/">Profile</a>)</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Business &#038; Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dsea/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><span>Until the adoption of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, Congress was limited to only two ways of appropriating money that could incur a national debt. First, Article 1 section 8, clause 2, gives Congress power to borrow money on the credit of the United States. It does not give Congress power to endlessly borrow money without stipulation. An explanation of borrowing on credit states that &#8220;Congress creates a binding obligation to pay for debts as stipulated and cannot thereafter vary the terms of its agreement.&#8221; law.onecle.com/constitutio</span><span>n/article-1/19borrowing.po</span>wer.html<br />
The Government Accountability Office (GAO), the U.S. Treasury Dept., and the Office of Management Budget (OMB) have all concluded that the governments current fiscal path is &#8220;unsustainable&#8221;. Congress has the responsibility to govern constitutionally not by unknown projection, speculation and hope. The second form of Congressional Appropriation of debt is given, in Article 1 section 8, clause 12 Congress is given the authority &#8220;To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years&#8221;.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>Until the adoption of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, Congress was limited to only two ways of appropriating money that could incur a national debt. First, Article 1 section 8, clause 2, gives Congress power to borrow money on the credit of the United States. It does not give Congress power to endlessly borrow money without stipulation. An explanation of borrowing on credit states that &#8220;Congress creates a binding obligation to pay for debts as stipulated and cannot thereafter vary the terms of its agreement.&#8221; law.onecle.com/constitutio</span><span>n/article-1/19borrowing.po</span>wer.html<br />
The Government Accountability Office (GAO), the U.S. Treasury Dept., and the Office of Management Budget (OMB) have all concluded that the governments current fiscal path is &#8220;unsustainable&#8221;. Congress has the responsibility to govern constitutionally not by unknown projection, speculation and hope. The second form of Congressional Appropriation of debt is given, in Article 1 section 8, clause 12 Congress is given the authority &#8220;To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2009/03/18/this-is-the-1st-paragraph-to-dead-bones-rise-didnt-copy-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dead Bones Rise</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2009/03/18/dead-bones-rise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2009/03/18/dead-bones-rise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a href="/dsea/">dsea </a> (<a href="/users/dsea/">Profile</a>)</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Business &#038; Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.redstate.com/dsea/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The 14th Amendment - first part of section 4 states; &#8220;The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.&#8221; The 39th Congress passed this law giving themselves unquestionable authority, which was then, as it is now unconstitutional. The validity of this action is fiercely debated. It takes 2/3 vote of both House and Senate and ratification of 3/4 of States to make an Amendment. After the Civil War the Southern States were fully recognised by the Federal Government as functioning members of the Union and were participants when the 13th Amendment was ratified. However, the 39th Congress, by majority vote excluded Member Seats of Congress to be seated for the 14th Amendment process. Only 50 Senators, and 182 Congressmen from the North were seated. Thus excluding 22 Senators and 58 Representatives from Southern States . The 39th Congress also saw fit to remove New Jersey Senator John P. Stockton from being Seated after he was already Seated. Congress has no authority to remove an already Seated Senator. 17 (out of 37) States rejected the 14th Amendment. (4 were questionable, two had first voted to ratify and then rescinded their vote). Southern States were put under military occupation and had their Seats removed until they were willing to Ratify the 14th Amendment (this some eventually did under duress). New Jersey and Ohio both rescinded their Ratification Vote. William H. Seward, then Secretary of the U.S., upon his sole discretion decided to Ratify the Amendment despite the circumstances and in so doing disregarded States votes. Oregon proclaimed &#8220;the Legislature that Ratified the Amendment to have been a &#8220;defacto&#8221; Legislature.&#8221; (Texas, Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Arkansas, N. Carolina, Kentucky, Virginia, Louisiana, S. Carolina, Delaware, Maryland, California, Mississippi, Ohio, and New Jersey, and Oregon had all opposed the Ratification of the 14th Amendment). Brought later, to the Supreme Court of Utah, Justice A.H. Ellett Ruled a Non Ratification, 2 other Justices agreed with him. However, this was not enough to make a difference. The overwhelming Judicial response was that it was not for the Courts to decide.<br />
From the Ruling of Justice A.H. Ellett: &#8220;How can it be conceived in the minds of anyone that a combination of powerful States can by force of arms deny another State a right to have representation in Congress until it has Ratified an Amendment which its people oppose? [And by what authority does any State (or combination thereof) claim to declare a sister State to have an invalid government?] The fourteenth Amendment was adopted by means almost as bad as that suggested above.&#8221; <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.constitution.org/14ll/14th_amendment_dyett.htm" target="_blank"><span style="color: #3b5998"><span>http://www.constitution.or</span></span><span>g/14ll/14th_amendment_dyet</span>t.htm</a></p>
<p>This 111th Congress is being called upon to be accountable to its constituents. Thus far, they have breached the realm of good governance and are dancing on the graves of principle. Should they continue in the direction of wielding unquestionable and unconstitutional debt, they will be guilty of advancing a 141 year old Score that begs to be settled.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 14th Amendment - first part of section 4 states; &#8220;The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.&#8221; The 39th Congress passed this law giving themselves unquestionable authority, which was then, as it is now unconstitutional. The validity of this action is fiercely debated. It takes 2/3 vote of both House and Senate and ratification of 3/4 of States to make an Amendment. After the Civil War the Southern States were fully recognised by the Federal Government as functioning members of the Union and were participants when the 13th Amendment was ratified. However, the 39th Congress, by majority vote excluded Member Seats of Congress to be seated for the 14th Amendment process. Only 50 Senators, and 182 Congressmen from the North were seated. Thus excluding 22 Senators and 58 Representatives from Southern States . The 39th Congress also saw fit to remove New Jersey Senator John P. Stockton from being Seated after he was already Seated. Congress has no authority to remove an already Seated Senator. 17 (out of 37) States rejected the 14th Amendment. (4 were questionable, two had first voted to ratify and then rescinded their vote). Southern States were put under military occupation and had their Seats removed until they were willing to Ratify the 14th Amendment (this some eventually did under duress). New Jersey and Ohio both rescinded their Ratification Vote. William H. Seward, then Secretary of the U.S., upon his sole discretion decided to Ratify the Amendment despite the circumstances and in so doing disregarded States votes. Oregon proclaimed &#8220;the Legislature that Ratified the Amendment to have been a &#8220;defacto&#8221; Legislature.&#8221; (Texas, Florida, Georgia, Alabama, Arkansas, N. Carolina, Kentucky, Virginia, Louisiana, S. Carolina, Delaware, Maryland, California, Mississippi, Ohio, and New Jersey, and Oregon had all opposed the Ratification of the 14th Amendment). Brought later, to the Supreme Court of Utah, Justice A.H. Ellett Ruled a Non Ratification, 2 other Justices agreed with him. However, this was not enough to make a difference. The overwhelming Judicial response was that it was not for the Courts to decide.<br />
From the Ruling of Justice A.H. Ellett: &#8220;How can it be conceived in the minds of anyone that a combination of powerful States can by force of arms deny another State a right to have representation in Congress until it has Ratified an Amendment which its people oppose? [And by what authority does any State (or combination thereof) claim to declare a sister State to have an invalid government?] The fourteenth Amendment was adopted by means almost as bad as that suggested above.&#8221; <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.constitution.org/14ll/14th_amendment_dyett.htm" target="_blank"><span style="color: #3b5998"><span>http://www.constitution.or</span></span><span>g/14ll/14th_amendment_dyet</span>t.htm</a></p>
<p>This 111th Congress is being called upon to be accountable to its constituents. Thus far, they have breached the realm of good governance and are dancing on the graves of principle. Should they continue in the direction of wielding unquestionable and unconstitutional debt, they will be guilty of advancing a 141 year old Score that begs to be settled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2009/03/18/dead-bones-rise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s Sunday night</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2008/11/09/its-sunday-night/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2008/11/09/its-sunday-night/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 23:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a href="/dsea/">dsea </a> (<a href="/users/dsea/">Profile</a>)</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Business &#038; Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I find that I have swung 2 to 3 levels to the right on the political spectrum. I have passed beyond the &#8220;Libertarian&#8221; point of view. I have not yet reached the &#8220;Nationalism&#8221; level. I suppose I am right smack dab on the &#8220;Reactionary&#8221; line. Obviously this is of great concern to me. I do not desire to swing any further right.</p>
<p>I am compelled to fight (as all reactionaries will do) against the attack on our governing system. In a negative way most reactionaries of the past fought to hold on to a monarchy or aristocracy. Today I stand to fight for the survival of the American democratic republic,and the constitution.</p>
<p>I take a stand that, the United States is the best governing country in the world. I delight in the Lord that our founding Fathers sought and believed in the divine providence that ushered their venture to the new world. I delight that God in his glory established the new country to be a beacon of light unto the world, a city upon a hill.</p>
<p>It is a sad time now that communism has made an internal attack against the U.S. We should not forget that the Black Panther Party(new and old) is in fact a communist party. We should not forget that the Black Panther Party sent their members over to Vietnam to fight against our troops during the war. We should not take lightly, that Black Panther members hold seats in congress. That Bobby Rush can be a congressman to me is shameful. </p>
<p>Khalid Al Mansour helped fund Obama&#8217;s (adult) Harvard education and he also mentored the leaders of the Black Panther Party of the 60&#8217;s. Should not the Black Panther Party members and their affiliates be disqualified from public office for their previous acts of treason. It should not stand for an enemy or friend of the enemy of the U.S. to be commander in chief of the U.S. military or hold a position in public office.</p>
<p>The quest of a reactionary is to ignite a spark. A spark to fight in order to hold onto what we have been granted. To fight at all costs. I solicit the aid of those to my right side and to those on my left. I do not solicit aid unto myself. As King David could not wear Saul&#8217;s armor neither can anyone suppose to know another individuals destiny. God knows, he formed you in your mothers womb. This we can know:</p>
<p>Are you a warrior? A mighty man of valour? - Fight with determination to win and be prepared to die. </p>
<p>Are you a writer? Write with a purpose and with persuasion. Keep the line of communication open. </p>
<p>Are you a judge? Judge righteously.</p>
<p>Are you a capitalist? Remember the afflicted and the poor and stretch your hand out to the needy.</p>
<p>Are you a Christian? Preach the truth. Preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ.</p>
<p>Are you a watchman? Blow the trumpet. Sound the alarm when danger is near. Warn the people.</p>
<p>These are truths for all to bear, however, your unique position empowers you with unique persuasion and ability. Let God be glorified in all things.</p>
<p>The American church lies on it&#8217;s porch like a neutered dog without passion.  While Christians around the world are dying for Christ the American church is content to appease a civil society. It does not the speak the outrageous or radical ideas that Christ taught. Christ taught to render unto Caesar the things that are Caesars,and unto God the things which belong to God. It seems as though most things are rendered unto Caesar and we forget what belongs to God.</p>
<p>Unfortunately America is feverishly adopting communism (anti-Christianity). I find as I become a reactionary Christian I can not contain an uncontrollable fire which burns within. I can not stop from speaking truths even if it incites war. Jesus did not change his message that he came to lead captivity captive and set the captives free. Jesus was indeed tried as an agitator against authorities because of messages such as this.</p>
<p>Did the apostles succumb to the civil societies desire for non-disruption of sinful woes? Or, did they go about the business of speaking truth in the face of lies, and everything that exalted itself above God and Christ his resurrected son?</p>
<p>In past years most of the gospel conversations I&#8217;ve had in the streets were a call to return to God, for many have fallen away. The swing of the political spectrum has prompted me now to proclaim the the message of hell, fire, and brimstone. Jesus Christ will return with a sword in his hand, and with great vengeance upon them that dwell upon the earth. Therefore, repent for the kingdom of heaven is at hand. God forbid that we remain silent!</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that I have swung 2 to 3 levels to the right on the political spectrum. I have passed beyond the &#8220;Libertarian&#8221; point of view. I have not yet reached the &#8220;Nationalism&#8221; level. I suppose I am right smack dab on the &#8220;Reactionary&#8221; line. Obviously this is of great concern to me. I do not desire to swing any further right.</p>
<p>I am compelled to fight (as all reactionaries will do) against the attack on our governing system. In a negative way most reactionaries of the past fought to hold on to a monarchy or aristocracy. Today I stand to fight for the survival of the American democratic republic,and the constitution.</p>
<p>I take a stand that, the United States is the best governing country in the world. I delight in the Lord that our founding Fathers sought and believed in the divine providence that ushered their venture to the new world. I delight that God in his glory established the new country to be a beacon of light unto the world, a city upon a hill.</p>
<p>It is a sad time now that communism has made an internal attack against the U.S. We should not forget that the Black Panther Party(new and old) is in fact a communist party. We should not forget that the Black Panther Party sent their members over to Vietnam to fight against our troops during the war. We should not take lightly, that Black Panther members hold seats in congress. That Bobby Rush can be a congressman to me is shameful. </p>
<p>Khalid Al Mansour helped fund Obama&#8217;s (adult) Harvard education and he also mentored the leaders of the Black Panther Party of the 60&#8217;s. Should not the Black Panther Party members and their affiliates be disqualified from public office for their previous acts of treason. It should not stand for an enemy or friend of the enemy of the U.S. to be commander in chief of the U.S. military or hold a position in public office.</p>
<p>The quest of a reactionary is to ignite a spark. A spark to fight in order to hold onto what we have been granted. To fight at all costs. I solicit the aid of those to my right side and to those on my left. I do not solicit aid unto myself. As King David could not wear Saul&#8217;s armor neither can anyone suppose to know another individuals destiny. God knows, he formed you in your mothers womb. This we can know:</p>
<p>Are you a warrior? A mighty man of valour? - Fight with determination to win and be prepared to die. </p>
<p>Are you a writer? Write with a purpose and with persuasion. Keep the line of communication open. </p>
<p>Are you a judge? Judge righteously.</p>
<p>Are you a capitalist? Remember the afflicted and the poor and stretch your hand out to the needy.</p>
<p>Are you a Christian? Preach the truth. Preach the Gospel of Jesus Christ.</p>
<p>Are you a watchman? Blow the trumpet. Sound the alarm when danger is near. Warn the people.</p>
<p>These are truths for all to bear, however, your unique position empowers you with unique persuasion and ability. Let God be glorified in all things.</p>
<p>The American church lies on it&#8217;s porch like a neutered dog without passion.  While Christians around the world are dying for Christ the American church is content to appease a civil society. It does not the speak the outrageous or radical ideas that Christ taught. Christ taught to render unto Caesar the things that are Caesars,and unto God the things which belong to God. It seems as though most things are rendered unto Caesar and we forget what belongs to God.</p>
<p>Unfortunately America is feverishly adopting communism (anti-Christianity). I find as I become a reactionary Christian I can not contain an uncontrollable fire which burns within. I can not stop from speaking truths even if it incites war. Jesus did not change his message that he came to lead captivity captive and set the captives free. Jesus was indeed tried as an agitator against authorities because of messages such as this.</p>
<p>Did the apostles succumb to the civil societies desire for non-disruption of sinful woes? Or, did they go about the business of speaking truth in the face of lies, and everything that exalted itself above God and Christ his resurrected son?</p>
<p>In past years most of the gospel conversations I&#8217;ve had in the streets were a call to return to God, for many have fallen away. The swing of the political spectrum has prompted me now to proclaim the the message of hell, fire, and brimstone. Jesus Christ will return with a sword in his hand, and with great vengeance upon them that dwell upon the earth. Therefore, repent for the kingdom of heaven is at hand. God forbid that we remain silent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2008/11/09/its-sunday-night/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>correcting my earlier mistake</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2008/11/09/correcting-my-earlier-mistake/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2008/11/09/correcting-my-earlier-mistake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 02:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a href="/dsea/">dsea </a> (<a href="/users/dsea/">Profile</a>)</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Business &#038; Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Podcast]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In an earlier post titled &#8220;We have not yet begun to fight&#8221;. I meant to say;  57 million American fighters out number 3 million, million man marchers by 54 million.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an earlier post titled &#8220;We have not yet begun to fight&#8221;. I meant to say;  57 million American fighters out number 3 million, million man marchers by 54 million.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2008/11/09/correcting-my-earlier-mistake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We have not yet begun to fight</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2008/11/09/we-have-not-yet-begun-to-fight/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2008/11/09/we-have-not-yet-begun-to-fight/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 01:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a href="/dsea/">dsea </a> (<a href="/users/dsea/">Profile</a>)</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Business &#038; Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pod cast]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[policies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Join the forces of 57 million Americans and counting.*Capitalists won&#8217;t  surrender their capital, *Militias won&#8217;t surrender their guns, *Christians won&#8217;t surrender their faith, *Speakers won&#8217;t surrender their speech. A &#8220;rebel yell&#8221; or &#8220;a call to action&#8221; will not come from the command of a leader. It will come from the sound of the 1st attack made against any of these freedoms.  Freedom wants you!  57 million american fighters out number 3 million - million man marchers by 54,000. Our fight is more fierce than a crowd of Acorn sign wavers.  </p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Join the forces of 57 million Americans and counting.*Capitalists won&#8217;t  surrender their capital, *Militias won&#8217;t surrender their guns, *Christians won&#8217;t surrender their faith, *Speakers won&#8217;t surrender their speech. A &#8220;rebel yell&#8221; or &#8220;a call to action&#8221; will not come from the command of a leader. It will come from the sound of the 1st attack made against any of these freedoms.  Freedom wants you!  57 million american fighters out number 3 million - million man marchers by 54,000. Our fight is more fierce than a crowd of Acorn sign wavers.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2008/11/09/we-have-not-yet-begun-to-fight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>capitalist labor strike?</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2008/11/01/capitalist-labor-strike-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2008/11/01/capitalist-labor-strike-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 16:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a href="/dsea/">dsea </a> (<a href="/users/dsea/">Profile</a>)</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Business &#038; Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[affirmative action]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[broken]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fight]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ins.]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[liabilities]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[patriot]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[radicalism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rise]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[theft]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wake up]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Win]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>*Speculation of new wars spawned by religion or race on our homeland is off key.   These instruments are used in order to detour the truth.<br />
Violence is not pending as some have feared; by the K.K.K., The Neo Nazis, The Nazis, The Skinheads, The White Power Movement, The White Supremacists, The White Pride Movement, The Christian Identity Movement, The Patriotic Movement, extreme right wingers, and neo conservatives.  But rather, what may be better understood as a “band of brothers”. Those, who will fight for the Constitution, men bound, to diffuse 50 years of under pinning and decades of fraudulent schemes created to overthrow American stability.  All that is necessary to activate the band of brothers all around the country is a legitimate rebel yell.  The peoples Militia, unlike high ranking government entities, do not need the approval of congress. The 2nd Amendment is granted to protect the Constitution itself.  Its powers are to protect the American people when Congressional Government has failed to do so.  As well as, when the government itself has become corrupt to the demise of our structural founding and of our personal liberties.<br />
From the lineage of the Sons of Liberty, I write.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Speculation of new wars spawned by religion or race on our homeland is off key.   These instruments are used in order to detour the truth.<br />
Violence is not pending as some have feared; by the K.K.K., The Neo Nazis, The Nazis, The Skinheads, The White Power Movement, The White Supremacists, The White Pride Movement, The Christian Identity Movement, The Patriotic Movement, extreme right wingers, and neo conservatives.  But rather, what may be better understood as a “band of brothers”. Those, who will fight for the Constitution, men bound, to diffuse 50 years of under pinning and decades of fraudulent schemes created to overthrow American stability.  All that is necessary to activate the band of brothers all around the country is a legitimate rebel yell.  The peoples Militia, unlike high ranking government entities, do not need the approval of congress. The 2nd Amendment is granted to protect the Constitution itself.  Its powers are to protect the American people when Congressional Government has failed to do so.  As well as, when the government itself has become corrupt to the demise of our structural founding and of our personal liberties.<br />
From the lineage of the Sons of Liberty, I write.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2008/11/01/capitalist-labor-strike-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>capitalist labor strike?</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2008/11/01/capitalist-labor-strike/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2008/11/01/capitalist-labor-strike/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 16:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a href="/dsea/">dsea </a> (<a href="/users/dsea/">Profile</a>)</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Business &#038; Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ACORN]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[affirmative action]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[broken]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fight]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Ins.]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[liabilities]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[patriot]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[radicalism]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[rise]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[theft]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[US]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[voting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Wake up]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Win]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>*Speculation of new wars spawned by religion or race on our homeland is off key.   These instruments are used in order to detour the truth.<br />
Violence is not pending as some have feared; by the K.K.K., The Neo Nazis, The Nazis, The Skinheads, The White Power Movement, The White Supremacists, The White Pride Movement, The Christian Identity Movement, The Patriotic Movement, extreme right wingers, and neo conservatives.  But rather, what may be better understood as a “band of brothers”. Those, who will fight for the Constitution, men bound, to diffuse 50 years of under pinning and decades of fraudulent schemes created to overthrow American stability.  All that is necessary to activate the band of brothers all around the country is a legitimate rebel yell.  The peoples Militia, unlike high ranking government entities, do not need the approval of congress. The 2nd Amendment is granted to protect the Constitution itself.  Its powers are to protect the American people when Congressional Government has failed to do so.  As well as, when the government itself has become corrupt to the demise of our structural founding and of our personal liberties.<br />
From the lineage of the Sons of Liberty, I write.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Speculation of new wars spawned by religion or race on our homeland is off key.   These instruments are used in order to detour the truth.<br />
Violence is not pending as some have feared; by the K.K.K., The Neo Nazis, The Nazis, The Skinheads, The White Power Movement, The White Supremacists, The White Pride Movement, The Christian Identity Movement, The Patriotic Movement, extreme right wingers, and neo conservatives.  But rather, what may be better understood as a “band of brothers”. Those, who will fight for the Constitution, men bound, to diffuse 50 years of under pinning and decades of fraudulent schemes created to overthrow American stability.  All that is necessary to activate the band of brothers all around the country is a legitimate rebel yell.  The peoples Militia, unlike high ranking government entities, do not need the approval of congress. The 2nd Amendment is granted to protect the Constitution itself.  Its powers are to protect the American people when Congressional Government has failed to do so.  As well as, when the government itself has become corrupt to the demise of our structural founding and of our personal liberties.<br />
From the lineage of the Sons of Liberty, I write.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2008/11/01/capitalist-labor-strike/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Need to reveal how old leftist antics relate to us now.</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2008/10/12/need-to-reveal-how-old-leftist-antics-relate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2008/10/12/need-to-reveal-how-old-leftist-antics-relate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 18:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><a href="/dsea/">dsea </a> (<a href="/users/dsea/">Profile</a>)</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Black Panthers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[International Revolutionary Communist Party]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Obama-Ayers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>I am thankful for the coverage of Obama and Ayers. I am dumbfounded at how unaware younger generations (of 20 something) are of things that are critically important. I&#8217;ve talked to many young people who -believe it or not- do not know what communism is. They do not know who the Black Panthers are and do not care about a terrorist attack that occurred 40 years ago. A big gap that I think Sen. McCain needs to fill immediately is to uncover the relevance of the Revolutionary Communist Party of today, and of the New Black Panther Party. For decades silence has prevailed. Wikipedia says the Black Panther movement was squelched in the 70&#8217;s. The New Black Panthers claim to be above board. Yet,the New Black Panthers are part of the International Communist Revolution. It has not been squelched.<br />
   In Dec. 2005 I went to New Orleans with the Northwest Baptist Convention and worked with the Salvation Army in operation &#8220;fluid&#8221; to distribute food after Hurricane Katrina. One day I worked in a canteen stationed a couple of blocks away from the projects near the Superdome. On this day, a terrified and hesitant black lady came out from the projects to get food. She was afraid of being seen. She was supposed to stay away from, and was supposed to hate all white people. She was provided for and protected by &#8220;friends&#8221; who kept her as a cleaning servant and a vessel for gang rapes. She got some food, and to lend a hand, I walked with her for a couple of blocks toward her home. Her fears were legitimized to me when she pointed out that she was being followed. Sure enough, a blue car circled around the block and us about 4 times. The person driving slowed down at one point and gave her a wave. The harshest experience I had during that time was not being able to help her escape from her situation.<br />
    As I walked back to the canteen, a passer by handed me a flyer promoting a Revolutionary Communist rally. At the days end I returned with the canteen crew to the Salvation Army warehouse. The warehouse was guarded by military personnel. I conversed with two military guards about the &#8220;revolution&#8221; and they asked if they could keep the flyer.<br />
    I was advised, not go into the area near the projects because it was Black Panther territory and people who went in there had been shot at. This explained why reconstruction in the area around the superdome had not yet started. The area around the superdome was in a sense held hostage, not for a money ransom, but rather to be the center stage for the RCP. Many were the cries around the world of a failure to get aid to the poorest communities affected by hurricane Katrina which were mostly black. It is hard to find anything illegal on the New Black Panthers or the Communist Revolution.<br />
    I did find an article of praise on the organizational work that was done near the superdome by a Black Panther member to distribute needed supplies, before &#8220;first responders&#8221; for disaster relief were available. The experience I had was different from the one the author of the article wrote about. However, the article does testify in accordance with the military guards testament that the Black Panthers did inhabit the area.<br />
    In summary, the Black Panthers were holding International Communist Revolution rallies. They were keeping aid from coming in and at the same time advertising to the world that their government had forsaken them. They were promoting themselves as good deed doers by supplying goods to those whom they literally held captive. I understand that a judgment by the government not to announce extra trouble is a good security measure employed in an already volatile situation. But, isn&#8217;t it time to let the cat out of the bag? My words may mean nothing to you, but the military guards knew what was up. Is this not worth investigating? Footage does exist of our rescue helicopters being shot at in the early stages of relief efforts.<br />
    More is at stake in this presidential campaign than election fraud.  The new strategy of the Revolutionary Communist Party is to promote or initiate or create or exploit whenever possible circumstances in which to tear down the American Government and structure.  Please vote for McCain as President! </p>
</blockquote>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>I am thankful for the coverage of Obama and Ayers. I am dumbfounded at how unaware younger generations (of 20 something) are of things that are critically important. I&#8217;ve talked to many young people who -believe it or not- do not know what communism is. They do not know who the Black Panthers are and do not care about a terrorist attack that occurred 40 years ago. A big gap that I think Sen. McCain needs to fill immediately is to uncover the relevance of the Revolutionary Communist Party of today, and of the New Black Panther Party. For decades silence has prevailed. Wikipedia says the Black Panther movement was squelched in the 70&#8217;s. The New Black Panthers claim to be above board. Yet,the New Black Panthers are part of the International Communist Revolution. It has not been squelched.<br />
   In Dec. 2005 I went to New Orleans with the Northwest Baptist Convention and worked with the Salvation Army in operation &#8220;fluid&#8221; to distribute food after Hurricane Katrina. One day I worked in a canteen stationed a couple of blocks away from the projects near the Superdome. On this day, a terrified and hesitant black lady came out from the projects to get food. She was afraid of being seen. She was supposed to stay away from, and was supposed to hate all white people. She was provided for and protected by &#8220;friends&#8221; who kept her as a cleaning servant and a vessel for gang rapes. She got some food, and to lend a hand, I walked with her for a couple of blocks toward her home. Her fears were legitimized to me when she pointed out that she was being followed. Sure enough, a blue car circled around the block and us about 4 times. The person driving slowed down at one point and gave her a wave. The harshest experience I had during that time was not being able to help her escape from her situation.<br />
    As I walked back to the canteen, a passer by handed me a flyer promoting a Revolutionary Communist rally. At the days end I returned with the canteen crew to the Salvation Army warehouse. The warehouse was guarded by military personnel. I conversed with two military guards about the &#8220;revolution&#8221; and they asked if they could keep the flyer.<br />
    I was advised, not go into the area near the projects because it was Black Panther territory and people who went in there had been shot at. This explained why reconstruction in the area around the superdome had not yet started. The area around the superdome was in a sense held hostage, not for a money ransom, but rather to be the center stage for the RCP. Many were the cries around the world of a failure to get aid to the poorest communities affected by hurricane Katrina which were mostly black. It is hard to find anything illegal on the New Black Panthers or the Communist Revolution.<br />
    I did find an article of praise on the organizational work that was done near the superdome by a Black Panther member to distribute needed supplies, before &#8220;first responders&#8221; for disaster relief were available. The experience I had was different from the one the author of the article wrote about. However, the article does testify in accordance with the military guards testament that the Black Panthers did inhabit the area.<br />
    In summary, the Black Panthers were holding International Communist Revolution rallies. They were keeping aid from coming in and at the same time advertising to the world that their government had forsaken them. They were promoting themselves as good deed doers by supplying goods to those whom they literally held captive. I understand that a judgment by the government not to announce extra trouble is a good security measure employed in an already volatile situation. But, isn&#8217;t it time to let the cat out of the bag? My words may mean nothing to you, but the military guards knew what was up. Is this not worth investigating? Footage does exist of our rescue helicopters being shot at in the early stages of relief efforts.<br />
    More is at stake in this presidential campaign than election fraud.  The new strategy of the Revolutionary Communist Party is to promote or initiate or create or exploit whenever possible circumstances in which to tear down the American Government and structure.  Please vote for McCain as President! </p>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.redstate.com/dsea/2008/10/12/need-to-reveal-how-old-leftist-antics-relate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
