« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

Obama’s horrible September 8th tactical blunder

Waking the Ents.

He was probably a pretty good community organizer. He’s got the right connections (terrorists, rabble-rousing racist preachers, tin-pot dictators, Chicago political machine), he’s got the shtick, he sounds reasonable, he’s personally magnetic. He’s got his Alinsky studies down pat. He’s got union muscle behind him. I don’t think the demands of actual leadership and governance matter to him one whit, so one can excuse his apparent lack of skills in managing foreign relations with non-Muslim countries, or managing domestic policy in any sense outside the accumulation of power to himself.

But boy has he seriously underestimated Americans. A population unused to its freedoms and with no long history of civilized justice, law and order, might be easily cowed or lulled into giving away those freedoms. But this is America. The land of George Washington, James Madison, and Thomas Jefferson. The nation that put down the world-ruling aspirations of Hitler and Imperial Japan first, and expansionist Communist Russia second. Our freedoms were bought at a dear price.

Can’t let a good crisis go to waste

The opportunistic cram-downs of Porkulus and Cap-and-Trade (the Global Warming Tax Bill), with 1000+ pages, under the cover of ‘fixing’ a wounded economy, voted on with no debate and no input from the opposition party before anybody read the bills, AND explicitly against the will of the people — all this had the stench of bullying, theft and graft. In the months following, people have actually read those bills. They’ve also seen an economy sinking further, hardly ‘stimulated’. The administration has been consigned to putting lipstick on a pig, alternately claiming (a) we’re actually recovering now, and (b) it’s Bush’s fault.

Thugocracy

The chumming around with Chavez and Castro; the shady past ties to Alinksy and to high-finance thieves; the serial apologies for America to Muslim dictatorships and to Old Europe (who owe us debts of gratitude they’ll never repay); the accumulation of unaccountable ‘czars’; the cabinet full of tax cheats, political hacks, and hustlers; the blatant takeovers of the banking and auto industries – the latter seemingly mostly to pay off union supporters — all smell to high heaven of a person whose greater ambitions do not particularly include the greater interests of our republic or its citizens. People in greater numbers are now watching what he does and not so much how he sounds.

Overplaying your hand, round 1

By the time the health care takeover plan reached the front burner, Americans had already had enough, and you see the results. There’s a saying : ‘we’ve seen this movie before’. We call it Venezuela. We didn’t like that movie.

He’s gotten his butt kicked on health-care takeover, and Cap-n-Tax is buried in a Senate committee, never to see the light of day. The uproar during the August recess, followed by predictably low-class pushback by unions and other Obamanistas, has driven the poll numbers of Obama and the Democrat label into the dirt, sinking any hope of a glorious cakewalk to permanent rule. Unless they can figure out a way to cheat their way past the people by taking over the census and putting ACORN in charge of elections.

Overplaying your hand, round 2

Now this guy wants to talk to our kids. All of them. With unfiltered access, doing an end-run around parents, and with complicit, fawning packaging (did you see this directive from the Education Youth Indoctrination Secretary ? Did you actually SEE it? OMG! OMGOMGOMGOMGOMG!!!!!) by a school environment dominated through and through with leftism. He surely can do this, although the last couple of days has seen that many districts (but probably no more than 5%, when all is said and done) will opt out, and some parents will pull kids out of school (again, probably a small percentage).

The left has thoroughly dominated the education system, K-thru-College, for decades. Right down to local school boards, even in completely RedState territory. Public schools are, completely literally, leftist indoctrination camps for the young, impressionable minds that are next generation’s voters. American parents have been lulled into complacency, unaware of the fearful magnitude of what is going on in their schools. But parents of school-age children are not what you call a solid Democrat constituency [h/t itrytobenice].

And now Obama has blown it. The tea parties rose, as it were, from the ground, as a result of the Porkulus outrage. In response to the health-care takeover threat, the anti-Obama forces have begun organizing and hardening defenses, finally engaging in new technologies, finally playing hardball. Even Democrat cash cow AARP is in danger from the inside, since millions of dues-paying members hate BambiCare and also vote on leadership.

The left will lose their monopoly on the schools

Americans now feel their kids are being unfairly targeted, thanks to Obama’s stupid move here. He’ll get his speech done, lots and lots of teachers and faculty will use the opportunity to get a little indoctrination in, a few pro-Democrat, pro-Obama warm and fuzzies implanted into the innocent and gullible hearts of our young. But this little stunt will have gained him little, and cost him much.

But he has awakened the Ents. School boards are close to all-powerful, but they are elected on a local level. Most parents and citizens have been asleep at the wheel, especially in Republican territory. Because of this event, we are going to see MASSES of people show up at school board meetings and PTA meetings who never did before, just like the townhalls of August.

They’re going to be asking some questions:

  • Why did you let this happen here?
  • Why did we elect you anyway if you’re just gonna be a sop to the left?
  • You know what? We’re gonna vote you out and get some people who actually CARE about our kids running our school boards.

I should point out one thing that’s true about the upcoming school board meetings that was not true about the townhalls. There will be enough angry citizens attending in those meetings to vote out incumbents in the next election. They won’t require the media, they won’t require the Republican Party. They have kids, their neighbors and friends have kids, and no amount of teacher endorsements, union intimidation, or smooth talking will keep them from turning out ineffective or leftist school board members, the very next election.

I am telling you now, and as far as I know, I am the first to say it. Obama’s circus-stunt flyby of our nation’s public schools on September 8 will end up dealing a fatal blow to the left’s decades-long ownership of the schools in conservative territory. It won’t happen right away, and it will in fact be a long and bloody war. The left is dug in and fortified, and they’ve been playing dirty for as long as anyone can remember. But it will happen.

I’ll never thank Obama for anything — not once, not ever — but at least a tip of the hat has been earned here.

COMMENTS

  • jburr

    for my children to go to the local zoo to see Libby the lion, yet I would be willing to bet that the vast majority of parents know nothing about the President of the United States trying to indoctrinate our children. It does not matter what political party the President is from it is not his job to raise my children and tell them what it means to be a good American, it is MY JOB!!! I am their father and I don’t need, nor did I ask, for his help raising my children. This sounds eerily reminiscent of the youth SS that Hitler cultivated across Germany. That turned our really well didn’t it? Spread the word this can not be allowed to happen. One would think that the President would have more pressing matters on his plate, than trying to replace millions of parents all by himself. Mr. President do your job and leave my children alone.

    • stephenlight

      President Bush (41) held a nationwide school conference in an election ear on October 1st. Apparently our democracy survived this intrusion of the Executive into our local schools. Please read his speech before you go off the deep end. I may think half, or more, of what passes for advocacy on this site is flawed, but at least I read it all first.

      • Leopard1996

        That stated, you know, stay in school, and encourage your classmates, and share your crayons, there would be no problem, but when teaching materials were given to schools by the Department of Education, where those materials stated things like, “What can I do so that the president can successful”. There is a major problem, so Mr 7 days to just comment on this blog, Go screw.

      • E Pluribus Unum

        the ‘helpful instructions’ for the teachers. I don’t think Bush 41 had anything like that.

        Fail.

      • Return to Revolution
      • farstar99

        You should be ashamed.

        You know full well that if Bush had circulated an indoctrination “lesson” with a line asking kids to describe how they can help him, moonbats would’ve soiled themselves.

        Hell, as it is, when Bush showed up to read them a book, the Lefty Loonies wet themselves.

  • Ausonius

    My local TV stations here in Columbus, Ohio have had stories about the speech to Congress, but not the school speech. This morning finally there was a runner at the bottom with a mention of it, but no “story” and certainly nothing about the growing protests about it.

    What is everyone seeing in their areas?

    Drudge called such a speech “unprecedented” but whether it is or not, it should warrant media attention.

    But we know why it does not!

    • E Pluribus Unum

      Headliners, leading off radio news on the hour, all that.

      • izoneguy

        The hard under belly of socialism is rearing it’s ugly head from the soft-spoken teachers….it’s really creepy. Like a alien abduction flick, except this time it’s real….

        Ughhh,

      • ColdWarrior

        Caller after caller yesterday on several local conservative talk radio programs, including on former congressman J.D. Hayworth’s on KFYI, which carries Rush, said they either have already called their kids’ principal or would be pulling their kids out. Tom Horne, our Republican Superintendent of Public Instruction, said in a short news radio interview clip it was up to the local school district to decide, but that he believed, looking at the proposed White House/Dept. of Education teaching guide, that the “instructional materials” seemed to be less on the instructional side and more on the “worshipful” side, or something along those lines.

        Thank you.

        ColdWarrior

      • alarm1201

        I work in Dallas as a subcontractor for the IRS and we’ve been talking about it all morning. Even the dems I work with are pretty mad.

    • Richard Mullins

      http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/6599457.html

      I guess the fact they we have conservatives running the place and the uproar is working out well.

  • Stan(ley) Pruss

    I was an elected school board member for 12 years and the hardest part was getting parents to pay attention. They all love their child’s teacher (leftist or not). They want the district to spend more money on their child, but don’t pay attention to how the money is spent. They want pretty buildings and small classes, but don’t realize phonics and avoiding fuzzy math are much more important. It was very hard to get people to run for school board. Only parents of small children were willing to run and too often they ran to get favors for their children.

    • E Pluribus Unum

      I can appreciate your position. School boards in my area are somewhat different. They have used the lack of interest in specifics to just do whatever they want as long as they can put a ‘for the children’ sticker on it. School board members are typically lefties masquerading as righties.

      But hear what I am saying. The citizen outrage expressed by the tea parties and the August townhall meetings is unheard of in our lifetimes. People in huge, huge numbers are now watching the administration with, to put it mildly, distrust.

      Now Obama has foolishly challenged the same citizens on the battleground of the schools. Just watch.

      • graceia

        but you are right that the sheer attention of the voters is beyond my imagination. I have been a political junkie since high school and this new interest by the electorate is wonderful. No longer are sports and movies the only topic of conversation.

      • kat

        And most of the school board members are Republicans, but unfortunately 90% of them are on the board to get jobs for family members and friends. They allow our very left wing administrators do what they want, as long as they get the job appointments they want. I have run against our long term incumbent more than once, but people are entrenched. They are fine with voting in the same guy time and again, as long as their taxes don’t go up too much. Sad on both sides.

        • stephenlight

          Just wondering, what specific “left wing” dogma have your administrators pushed on your schools?

          • E Pluribus Unum

            Nothing except ‘mom and dad’s car pollute’, ‘the polar bears are going to drown if we don’t get a hybrid car’, ‘American arrogance caused 9/11′.

          • blooch
          • ss396

            When my children come home announcing that “man is the enemy of the whale” I get infuriated. I will be first to admit that man is often a poor – even pathetic – steward of the planet, but I will not accept that we are enemies of it. That is an activist agenda, not an instructional one.

            This is just one example; let me know if you need more.

    • Achance

      owns practically every school board in America. At most we can manage a token member or two that aren’t party line NEA. I ran a few years ago purely to have a forum, I had $3K of my own money and it was worth it to make the NEA answer me. A friend of mine, no conservative really, but a lot more conservative than the NEA likes, ran at the same time. NEA endorsed his opponent and he spent over $15K to narrowly win; this for a seat that takes a lot of time, gets you all sorts of controversy and criticism, is usually a dead end politically, and which pays NOTHING.

      • E Pluribus Unum

        At least in our area, school board elections are separate from other elections, and the turnout is something abysmal, like 3%.

        The success of the tea party thing has not been in reaching the left. It has been about reaching the right, and convincing our own that there are more of ‘us’ than there are of ‘them’. If some sort of tea party thing takes hold and you have 400 people at a school board meeting where previously there were 20, then a strange and new thing will happen.

        No amount of NEA money will overcome a whole bunch of community parents that are genuinely pissed off and newly aware that we outnumber the bad guys. Especially in a local election, street walking, neighborhood walking, signs in yards will have more effect than in a larger election.

        Well, I should not say “no amount of NEA money”. It won’t be a cakewalk, but I think it’s winnable.

        • Achance

          could do, is to consolidate elections. Every election from dogcatcher, including initiatives, all the other stuff that goes on ballots is on the first Tuesday after the second Monday in December. Having state and local elections on the second monday after the third Wednesday after the third full moon when Venus is in Aquarius means that nobody votes except those with their hooves in the trough. Sure, it would make a long ballot but I’m all for discourageing the stupid and attention span challenged from voting.

          • gemimail

            When I was an elected official forty years ago, I persuaded the Arizona State Legislature to move school board elections to the general election. As a former teacher, I was well aware that teachers dominated school board elections because of the low turnout. It is still that way today. May I suggest that you call your local legislator in other states to do the same there? See ARS 15-424. All it requires is one sentence in the statute concerning election of school board members: “A regular election shall be held for each school district at the time and place, and in the manner, of general elections as provided in title XX”. Substitute whatever title in your state covers elections.

  • izoneguy

    But from the posts on facebook from teachers wondering what the fuss is about – don’t have a clue – or they are very good actors:

    Here are a few responses:

    “Let your voice be heard, but, while you’re at it, listen to others. We must engage softly and kindly yet actively with one another if we truly believe in democracy.”

    “if you’re concerned about what the President will say, record the address and watch it later. But please, watch it with your children.

    Stop the recording if you feel that the President has made a political statement and tell your children WHY you believe this is a political statement. Explain to them your political opinion, which differs from his. And then ASK them what they think. Do they agree or disagree with you? Why? In other words, start to engage them in the political conversation of this nation.

    In other words, use this address to the children of America as your own teaching moment with your kids. And while you’re at it, use it as a learning moment to find out something about how your kid thinks. You might be surprised.

    If you’re concerned about the contents of the message, take action. But please don’t tell your children NOT to listen to the U.S. President. That strategy may come back to haunt you when your political party is in power again.”

    “until someone can show me reliable communication backing up the claims that children are supposed to write letters supporting the president, I have to go with what has been published. I think that inferring nefarious or underhanded intent in this manner undermines the credibility of those who are spreading it.”

    Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm

    • E Pluribus Unum

      Dude, those are pathetic people. Either stupid or evil.

      • Ausonius

        As I wrote this morning, the NObama House and Edumbcation Department were not subtle enough: the leftists in History or Social Studies know what to do with such a speech!

        Proselytize future voters to love Big Brobama!

        But they have surely “misunderestimated” the reaction from parents, perhaps even Dem parents are wondering now what is happening.

      • izoneguy

        I think the teachers are pissed now that they are in the middle of all of this…..

        Most of them do not want to challenge the parents. So they will
        not bust their asses to spread dear leaders word….
        At least not in an overt fashion…

        Eyes wide open

  • GT350

    I called my daughter’s Catholic school. They aren’t planning on showing anything next week. Any “programming notes” would come from the Archdiocese. They don’t give a rip what the Dept of Education says.

    • blooch

      Surburban Atlanta public school, one of the best in the state. My wife got the E-mail last night…the gist was that instructioanl time is limited, so we’ll not be participating, but we’ll make the materials available so you can view and discuss with your child.

  • tcolegrove

    and I got it. I’ve been calling since Tuesday to find out if our school district was participating in the televised event and at 10:30 this morning was notified that they were but the students could opt out. How was an ‘opt out’ going to work? I’d been very patient and respectful with everyone in the administration that I spoke with and was frustrated with the final result. So I sent an email to the school board with some liable concerns facing the district should they participate and in less then two hours they had reversed their decision. I encourage everyone in every school distrcit to call and email because we can make a difference. This is a school district with over 15,000 students, the 9th largest in the state of Ohio.

    Letter:
    I am asking you to reconsider showing the scheduled speech from President Obama to the Hilliard City School District. I think there is a high liability factor involved to the school and wish to prevent that from occurring. In addition, many are planning on holding their kids home from school that day should it be shown and I don’t think that is a wise option either. I don’t want to read too much into the intent of the President, but I think it is fair to say that many will not support such action and see it at a means of propganda and in the best interest of education our children I think we need to find an acceptable solution.

    While the President engages in educational discussions with students, I can’t help but ask the intent of this lesson. The details can be found at the following link: http://www.docstoc.com/docs/10582301/President-Obama%E2%80%99s-Address-to-Students-Across-America-September-8-2009

    This “lesson” includes (PREK-6th):

    The students are to answer of the following questions while watching:
    -What is the President trying to tell me?
    -What is the President asking me to do?
    -What new ideas and actions is the President challenging me to think about?

    Remember, in a free society, we should not be in fear of what someone might say, however PREK-6th grade is no place for a political stump speech. I believe it is within our right to request the transcript and the intent of the lesson from our eduction board/teachers prior to the event. Or at the very least require permission from the parents of these children to participate or decline participation if the details are not available for review. A simple solution would be to broadcast an email to the parents that include a transcript of the speech to aleviate unnecessasry concerns on behalf of the hesitant parents as offering an opt out class option could lead to children being ostracized for not participating or even at this young age a feeling of being left out.

    Because no matter how you feel during the current political environment, I think we can all agree that we do not want to federalize/nationalize the schools. I do not want the local power to be stripped from our school board where we can make a difference to the powers that be in Washington.

    Thank you for your time and consideration.

    • E Pluribus Unum

      So, when you say they reversed their decision, you are saying that the district is NOT going to be showing the speech at all?

      • tcolegrove

        “Good afternoon,

        As many of you may already know, President Barack Obama is broadcasting an address to students online next Tuesday, September 8, at noon. The district has attempted to take a neutral position regarding the broadcasting of the address in school by offering students the option of viewing or not.

        However, since yesterday we have received significant feedback from our school community regarding the broadcast in our schools. We also have just learned that the address will be available on C-Span for recording, as well as posted on the White House Web site (www.whitehouse.gov) for viewing at any time.

        Parents will now be able to access and share the broadcast with their children at their own discretion. The district will not broadcast the President?s address in the schools on Tuesday. We hope this decision will address the concerns of all our parents and prevent the disruption of our students? school day.”

        • E Pluribus Unum

          That is outstanding!

        • Spartan4Life

          Thanks for the inspiration.

          Dear Dr. Compton,

          I am writing to express concern about President Obama?s planned broadcast to American schoolchildren on September 8. I don?t really believe the classroom is an appropriate place for political speech. While I am sure the President would argue that his message will be apolitical, in our democracy anything the president says or does has political effect. I don?t believe it is right or fair to use his power to gain access to our children. I am not even sure this is legal under the charter which created the Department of Education. I thought locally elected school boards were responsible for classroom content.

          I am reading that many districts around the country have reflected on this and are now choosing not to show the President?s speech. Some have pointed out that the President?s speech will be recorded and parents can watch it and then decide whether they want to share it with their children. I am just writing to ask whether the Bentonville board has considered whether this is an appropriate use of the President?s power. If you would kindly share any thoughts you have on the matter it would be appreciated. Thank you.

          • E Pluribus Unum

            I’m curious to see how this all works out.

          • cclive

            will you take your child out od school for the day? Lots are taking that option.

          • Aaron Gardner
          • Spartan4Life

            My kids are in HS so don’t think they’ll be indoctrinated. They are both really conservative and good at arguing their points of view.

            It will be the teachers they will have to take on not their fellow students. There is, I believe, a growing amount of conservative ideology amongst this nextgen group. I think they see all this debt and deficits and think they are getting screwed.

          • cclive

            in questioning authority, particularly the government kind, although school isn’t always that accepting of independent thinkers. They could suggest that in an effort to be fair and balanced someone should be allowed to do a counter point speech the following day. Best of luck to them.

    • stephenlight

      Yes, we should not nationalize our schools. The Chinese, Koreans, Japanese and Singaporeans are laughing their butts off reading this. They have nationalized schools and are beating your kid’s butt’s like a drum! But, at least, you have local control…..enjoy it.

      • MacAoidh

        There are lots of websites out there for left-wing douches. Pick one.

      • E Pluribus Unum

        And not a cool tool like a hammer. Just a duckway.

  • Russ Martin

    Local talk radio here in the San Antonio area is announcing that two San Antonio school districts aren’t airing The Dear Leader’s speech. We live in a small town north of San Antonio and our school district isn’t airing it either.

    I’ll be interested to find out how many school districts across fly-over country do the same. I bet it will be more than the 5% that E Pluribus predicts.

    • Richard Mullins

      East Central ISD is one of them. It was conservative when I was in school, so it would be nice to see if it stays that way.

      Edit: I see that Northside and Northeast ISD’s are not showing it. They have combined the same amount or more students than Cy-Fair here in Harris county.

  • wendy

    The only way to protect children from political indoctrination in the schools in the long run is to privatize the entire school system, in as many states as you possibly can. Sell the schools to private parties, then use the money to give vouchers to parents with kids currently enrolled until the money runs out. From that point on, all parents would be responsible for their own kids’ education bills. There would have been years of no property tax by that point, so this is not an unreasonable burden for something they should be willing to do as parents anyway. I shouldn’t have to pay property taxes so some little gangbanger gets glorified babysitting services all day and Obama Youth can “learn” all about the dire emergency of global warming and how evil Pilgrims and pioneers slaughtered the hapless, darling little native “Americans.”

    Trying to halfway privatize schools isn’t working. The left sabotages every effort and reasserts control. So it is necessary to stop half-axing our efforts, create a movement (to go with everything else on the Tea Party list, LOL) and go all in. That is the long-term solution.

    • stephenlight

      A very interesting idea. Of course, it will make the Chinese just hysterical with delight. So, in the interest of protecting your children from anything but what you consider right, you will fragment the country into little ideological ghettoes. Interesting…and do you suppose the country would profit from this fragmentation? Yes, i suppose the correct thinking folks like yourself will be pleased. Truly, you have no idea how delicious an idea this is to our foreign adversaries. Hilarious.

      • http://www.thediscerningconservative.com discerningconservative
      • Brian Hibbert

        Make sure that everyone follows the goals of the state? Everything for the people as represented by the state? Individuals aren’t important except as they meet the needs of the people as represented by the state?

      • Leopard1996

        School teaches math, english, science, history, reading. Morals, loyalty to country, is my business, and mine alone. The issue isn’t about nationalization of education. The issue is teachers are too busy teaching things like Heather’s Got Two Mommies, and the like.

        If nationalized, public education was such the cat’s ass, how in the hell do you explain that most homeschool kids out perform public school kids.

      • MacAoidh

        …you can spare us the Comintern directive line. Nobody’s buying it.

        Good decisions by good parents will produce better results than anything the government can produce.

        Ideological ghettoes? The only ghettoes I see in America are the ones where left-wing government has destroyed individual will and civil society. What rock did you come out from under?

  • pdulli

    from Team Obama. Failed to consult school calendars around the country. Schools in the large metro areas (New York, Los Angeles, Chicago) will not yet have started. His biggest (and most receptive) audience will not even be in attendance.

    • RetiredLEO

      It wouldn’t surpriese me any to see these school districts (New York, LA, and Chicago) show a taping of the speech at an unannounced later date.

    • cclive

      he’s already got them brainwashed. Schools in the Southern US on average start earlier he’s targeting his opposition with these indoctrination techniques.

  • larueladue

    Waking the Ents…. yeah, it will be like that, if this continues….

    • E Pluribus Unum

      any chance to get in a reference to LOTR, Princess Bride, or Young Frankenstein has to be taken advantage of.

      I am considering making a Youtube video, dubbing a scene from Blazing Saddles. The scene where Hedley Lamarr is taking applications to be in his gang to wipe out the town, I want to take that and dub in dialog that basically represents the Obamanistas taking applications for Cabinet and czar posts. You have to demonstrate your criminal skills before being granted a position.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    If you are a concerned parent in Austin, KXAN wants to interview you now (by 7pm) for the 10pm story.

    It’s getting legs.

  • http://travismonitor.blogspot.com Freedoms Truth

    Mr Cult-of-personality disorders talks to kids
    http://travismonitor.blogspot.com/2009/09/mr-cult-of-personality-disorder-talks.html

    What’s the big deal with Obama’s speech?
    http://travismonitor.blogspot.com/2009/09/whats-big-deal-with-obamas-speech-to.html

  • penguin2

    has no problems inserting itself into the classroom and using the entire school system to promote it’s agenda. I wonder if anyone remembers, the reports of Pres. Bush’s picture or comments related to his faith or even the posting about the Founding Fathers faith have been disallowed by these ‘wonderful’ government schools?

    Remember the story of the policeman (retired military) who entered a classroom to take down a defamed picture of Pres. Bush that the teacher had allowed as art.

    http://www.progressive.org/mag_mcteacher510 or this one:

    http://www.callingfortruth.org/cft/content/view/54/1/

    this one was about taking down the picture of George Washington praying at Valley Forge, in a government school classroom. Maybe people will remember other incidents as we fight to keep leftist propaganda out of the classroom.

    Oh yes EPU, I loved the Lord of the Rings reference.

  • jano4

    On our website…:
    The President of the United States will air a live national address for students Tuesday, Sept. 8, 2009 on the importance of education.
    Friendswood ISD is unable to accommodate the showing of this to all students on campuses at one time. We encourage parents to tape this speech if they choose and watch it at a later time with their children.
    Teachers will have the option to have their classes air the speech. Any teachers who plan to show the special presentation will notify parents and students and under Friendswood ISD policy, will allow students to opt out of watching it. Parent or student notification to opt out will be followed.

    I too love the Ents reference….very nice.

  • azaeroprof

    This from the Prescott Unified School District web site:

    The President’s speech next week is a perfect example of “A good idea gone astray.”
    After reviewing the materials associated with the speech PUSD will not televise the speech or broadcast it via computers.
    If parents want their children to see the speech, parents can record it and watch the speech at home with their children.
    As the superintendent of schools, I am not comfortable with school district resources being used for this purpose; therefore Prescott Unified School District will not carry the speech either via television or via computers in our schools.

    Thank you.
    Kevin J. Kapp, Superintendent
    Prescott Unified School District
    Prescott, Arizona

    • E Pluribus Unum

      I hope that somewhere in the right-sphere, somebody is compiling lists of districts “just saying no”, with some estimates of the number of kids being liberated from the Obama speech.

    • gemimail

      This is what happens when a state holds school board elections in the regular general election. School boards are controlled by the voters (and parents) and not by the teachers. I live in the Prescott area and you can see that this is one red state where liberal teachers do not run the show. Get your state to move the school board elections to the general election and your superintendent will issue a statement just like this because he was hired by a school board who is responsible to the voters and not the teachers.

      • azaeroprof

        I believe you’re the first “neighbor” I’ve seen in my time at RedState. We have several from PHX and Flagstaff from Flagstaff. Welcome to the best conservative site on teh interwebs!

  • DaveWT4

    My brother works in the IT department for Clear Creek Independent School District, southeast of Houston. They will not be airing Obama’s speech.

  • aircare

    Both President Reagan and Bush 41 spoke live to classrooms nationwide. October 1, 1991 President George H. W. Bush pitched his education plan in a speech broadcast live to school classrooms nationwide. On November 14, 1988 President Reagan spoke to students that was broadcast live and rebroadcast by C-Span and Instructional Television Network. President George W. Bush wanted to speak but was persuaded not to because he could no speak the English language properly.

    • Leopard1996

      1. Regan Speech, if there was one, wasn’t broadcast to every student in America, probably because the education unions wouldn’t divert the time. Trust me, I went to a public school in NJ, and I would have remembered a speech done back then by Ronald Regan or Bush 1. Both of these were not shown at any time in my school district. (Liberal area, and public school, I am sure a smart guy like you can figure that out.)

      2. If you boy had any credibility of not trying to community organize the whole country, and indoctrinate to keep and maintain power, there wouldn’t have been the outcry that there was.

      So at this point, I think we have a candidate for the blamstick. Mr. 3 months, and only this comment. Go Screw.

    • http://hillbillypolitics.com Steph C

      I resemble your remarks, too. I might not speak English properly to your standards but at least I know what the words mean.

      But in the artificial, supremely superficial world that you and TheWon live in it’s better to speak pretty than know what you’re talking about.

    • JadedByPolitics

      The prior two speeches did NOT have classroom liberals giving them working orders as to how to serve the President either. I know you little leftists have been spouting this crap all day long across the nets but you always neglect to mention the TOOLS of the teachers and the class plans WRAPPED around the speech. When you think of something to say with regards to that then you may come back and address it otherwise you are just a TOOL!

    • http://moelane.com/ Moe Lane

      …and then the name “George W. Bush” pops up; and then they lose it completely.

      To the point of bad spelling. Which isn’t relevant to the banning, but is funny.

      • Leopard1996

        You are my hero, I want to be just like you when I grow up.

  • throwback59

    I understand Comrade Obama is going to teach the school kids some slogans updated from the recent past:

    1. Obama is always right!
    2. Obama, we stand with you!
    3. One Nation! One People! One Messiah!

  • LAUS DEO

    E Pluribus Unum,
    Well written!!! A substantial portion of the points you have made are the same I’ve had stirring in my head as we deal with the rising tyranny of democrats and their ilk. Their arrogance is expected yet their ignorance of Americans is completely fascinating. They truly think that all should be their minions.
    FREEDOM!!! We Americans demand, expect freedom. Not the so-called freedom of the left which twist it into the freedom of amoral selfishness. Yet freedom to live, enjoy liberty, and the pursuit of happiness without the burden of tyranny to threaten, manipulate, intimidate, or more importantly, not to take from the people these God given rights.

    Thank You!

    • stephenlight

      Please give me a list of the Freedoms that you have seen revoked since January 20, 2009.

      • Brian Hibbert

        Got anything smart to say? Or are you just full of one line quips?

      • Leopard1996

        By the Bush Administration, and you can’t be a douchebag and say Patriot Act, because Obama, and your crew haven’t rescinded it. Can we please get the Blamstick here.

        This site is for supporting conservative values and getting republicans elected. You are obivously not here for that goal.

      • Jack_Savage

        The freedom given to Moe to blam you.

        Bon voyage.

      • Next93

        The right to choose my own doctor

        The right not to have my tax money go to abortions

        The right not to have to pay for health care for illegal aliens

        The right to not have the government artificially inflating my energy bill in order to support a congressional water empire in the name of an uproven theory.

        The right to manage my own property, even if it includes a mud puddle wetland.

        The right to collect debts owed me by companies that are politically useful to the ruling party.

        The right of creditors to fair representation in bankruptcy court

        The right of workers to a secret union election

        The right of radio station owners to program content that disagrees with the narrative of the ruling party

        The right of a company (say for instance a bank) to make and keep a contract with an employee (say for instance a bonus)

        The right not to have hyperinflation destroy my life savings in order to buy MORE democrat votes in Ohio and Michigan

        The right to have public discussion and congressional oversight over cabinet membersczars.

        The protection of the emollient clause of the constitution.

        The right to see the birth certificate of the sitting president in order to determine if he meets the congressional requirements of the presidency.

        • Leopard1996

          Sorry doucheboy will never see that.

        • http://impudent.blognation.us/blog kyle8

          I will be stealing that.

  • gemimail

    See: http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_OBAMA_SPEECH_SCHOOLS?SITE=ILROR&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT.

  • redneck_hippie

    Talk about stirring up the hornets’ nest, Barry. Parents, grandparents and just plain freedom-loving citizens of the good ole U S of A are rejecting what they know to be a stupid beyond words propaganda campaign. I find it incredible the administration would go forward with this in light of the discontent and activism current all over our fair land.

    Monumental stupidity. Monumental arrogance. I’m spitting mad!

    • stephenlight

      ?We must not lose our faculty to dare, especially in dark days.? – Churchill in March, 1942.

      MMMM, perhaps this is really President Obama’s line?

      • redneck_hippie

        nt

  • Tbone

    I think he should lead them in the Pledge of Alligiance.

    That should leave him speechless.

    • Technocracy

      Make him recite it without a teleprompter.

      • Tbone

        nt

    • http://www.redstate.com/tnjim TNJim
      • ceili_dancer

        Of course he does, he had to review it to become a naturalized citizen.

    • http://www.suvstrategery.blogspot.com SoFiMil

      Obama will speak to the America’s youth on September 8th and address a joint-session of conference on September 9th. On September 11th, however, I doubt he’ll do more than release a statement.

  • http://www.redstate.com/tnjim TNJim

    Can’t add anything beyond what you originally said and most of the comments here, but I did submit it to digg.

  • Return to Revolution

    Not just here… but did anyone notice the facebook poll – 65% against, yet I’d say more than 65% of the comments are in favor.

    Leftists seem to be surprised by the pushback, not expecting it. Remember this leftists:

    When Bush was in office: every (non) vacation. Every (non) golf outing. Every door in China (all one of them). Every last detail of that administration was nuked 24/7. So….. GET USED TO IT.

    On the other hand, we actually have substantive arguments for opposing the president. So go scream racism, overreaction, etc, and watch your movement circle the drain.

    http://apps.facebook.com/realpolls/results/wj5wgz4j0

    • E Pluribus Unum

      They’re not used to having their opponent actually fire back with live weapons.

  • http://www.suvstrategery.blogspot.com SoFiMil

    Someone in the administration should have seen this coming. The Either that, or no one had the guts to say shut this down.

    • blooch

      Obama is being ill-served by his Yeswecan men and women, and his adoring MSM does nothing to temper his ideological extremism. He’s left with nothing but polls and public pushback to give him pause, both of which can be rationalized away by his Alinsky mindset.

      Right now, he’s flying blind in a thunderstorm, and he’s only calling “May Day” to the Union thugs.

    • blooch

      I forgot that he has expanded his call to include kids dancing around the Maypole.

  • http://hillbillypolitics.com Steph C

    The schools have decided for an “opt in” but that’s not the disturbing thing. It’s the comments section where neither side can argue their points without name calling and mud slinging.

    I don’t think any of them get it either. It’s not the speech in and of itself which will likely be innocuous (at least on the surface). It’s the force fed curriculum that will follow that is disturbing.

    I’m troubled by the name calling, to be honest. Just as our reactions have dulled to the accusations of racism every time we criticize the left, so has the left dulled to accusations of communism and socialism. Someone even invoked Hitler and while it fits in a lot of ways, it doesn’t do much for an argument.

    What that says to me is we need to find some other way to fight the socialist/communist takeover without using the words. Those words have ceased to have power except to those who truly understand what they mean.

  • izoneguy

    Perry ?troubled? by rollout of Obama school speech

    http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/politics/entries/2009/09/03/perry_troubled_by_rollout_of_o.html

    http://travismonitor.blogspot.com/2009/09/rrisd-says-no-thanks-to-obamas-kiddie.html

    The point on parental rights and failure to involve school boards is well taken. Showing the Obama speech in Texas classrooms without giving parents notice and opportunity to opt out is a violation of Texas law. A helpful school board member directed me here:

    TX Education Code – Chapter 26 deals with parental rights.

    26.001 – Parents are PARTNERS in their education and should be encouraged to actively participate in creating and implementing programs for their children. No opportunity for parental involvement has been offered.

    26.006 – Access to teaching materials – parents haven’t been given access to this speech to review it to determine if it’s appropriate for their child. Teaching unreviewed materials is likely a violation of Texas law. Subsection (b) provides that the district must make the materials available for your review. Ask them to provide you with an advance copy of the speech! Make this request IN WRITING!

    26.010 – Exemption from Instruction – parents must be given an opportunity to opt-out of any school activity that conflicts with the parent’s religious or moral beliefs. You need to deliver a written statement — and they’ll have to pull your kid out of class. Suggest that they offer an alternative, like studying the Declaration of Independence or the US Constitution!

    As for RRISD, policy EMB – instruction of controversial issues – teachers must be well-informed of the areas being taught. Since the speech isn’t available for teacher review, how can they be well-informed? Also requires that they are CERTAIN (emphasis on that word) that the material is appropriate. Again – how can they be CERTAIN?

    The bottom line is this: Given the logistics involved of handling parental requests on such short notice, and the failure of the Obama administration to provide text of the speech prior to ensure it is not controversial, it is likely that any school district that puts this speech in their classrooms without giving ample opportunity for parents to opt out will be violating Texas law!

    • E Pluribus Unum

      And in some cases, I’m interested in prosecuting school district personnel.

      • Richard Mullins

        we might have to thank the Humble ISD school board president. He wrote a letter to Arne Duncan asking him not ot show it. I got the .PDF in email from the Harris County Republican Party.

  • Curt409

    Government funded schools have zero reasons to present any notion that does not support big government or big labor.

    They may not overtly teach leftist propaganda in any one session, but look at the body of work! Look at the text books! Listen to the pro obamacare ad paid for by NEA!

    ‘I pledge to do my part to reduce the federal payroll (excluding military) to 20 non union part-time employees’.

    • mom2oneson
  • vedhz

    A succesful person should always have an unbiased approach.http://rd3.ca/index.php