« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

It’s Not the End. It’s Not Even the Beginning of the End.

Originally posted at 73wire.com

What a difference eighteen months makes. In November, 2008, the Republican Party was left for dead at the side of the road with mainstream press organs pontificating about the causes of its permanent demise.

Today?

Even the LeftStreamMedia is acknowledging that a Republican takeover of the House isn’t just a possibility, it’s a likelihood and the latest LSM meme is that the Senate might just be in play as well. Why? Because the American people have seen up close and personal what an unvarnished Marxist, socialistic economic program looks like and they’re not buying it.

Not only are the Dems on the run, but conservatives are nigh unto giddy as, one after another, Establishment candidates in GOP Primaries are defeated by Movement conservatives. The outpouring of conservative activism the likes of which hasn’t been seen in my lifetime has propelled conservatives into the ranks of the Party. There is a palpable excitement growing on the Right that we might actually be able to stop this headlong careening into socialistic irrelevancy.

And then comes this article from The Hill with the somewhat stunning title “Centrist Republicans Pin Their Political Hopes on the Class of ’10″.

Say what? I thought this was the year of the conservative? Let these money quotes serve as a cold splash of water in the face:

But if centrists such as Reps. Mike Castle (Del.) and Mark Kirk (Ill.) win their races, it might soften the influence of conservatives in the 112th Congress. Congressional experts and lawmakers say a strong class of centrists could blunt the influence of conservative freshmen sent to Washington by Tea Party voters.

and,

The goal of anybody who wants to solve a problem is to create some momentum for other people to join in,” said Graham who added that centrists such as Castle and Kirk would be more likely to join bipartisan talks.

Castle and Kirk, for example, were helpful allies to Democrats after they captured control of the House in 2006. They both voted for several proposals of the legislative agenda Democrats campaigned on to oust Republicans from power.

That’s right. The “centrists” in the Republican Party are already licking their chops at the prospect of enacting “meaningful” legislation (one of the “successes” of “bipartisanship” mentioned in the article was the passage of the $787,000,000,000 stimulus package). If this sounds eerily familiar, it’s because it is.

In 1994, after 40 years in the minority in the House, conservatives took over the agenda and rode the Contract with America to one of the most resounding triumphs in American electoral history. So, of course, on the heels of this great success of conservatism, a group of “centrists” formed what they called the Republican Main Street Partnership dedicated to, well, undoing and blocking the conservative agenda.

In 2008, we reaped the harvest of that Partnership.

What does this mean? It means that the work of conservative activists is not complete. It’s not even close to complete. There still lurk among us those who not only aren’t committed to the cause of Constitutional freedom, they are openly hostile to it. They place a higher value on “accomplishing something” than they do adhering to the wisdom of the Founders.

There is much work left to be done to retake our Party; to become the Party. There are thousands of Precinct Committeemen slots to be filled. GOTV tasks to be completed. Educational efforts in which to engage. Volunteer campaign activities to finish. And, in the case of Mike Castle, there’s an alternative to be had by the name of Christine O’Donnell who would deny the Quislings yet another voice and vote.

We can’t elect a Jim DeMint conservative in every state of the Union (yet). But American’s in every state are starting to feel the effects of liberal/social policies in every aspect of their lives. They fear it. They’re weary of it. Conservatism works every time it’s tried. You know that. I know that. It’s time to let the country know that.

In 2004, countless conservatives (myself included) surveyed the political scene and concluded that we had reached the pinnacle for which we had worked so many years. Well, as Thomas Jefferson stated: “The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.”

We are not at the end, fellow conservatives. We are not even at the beginning of the end of this war to rescue our country from those who wish to remake it. We made that mistake between 1994 and 2008. Let’s not make it again.

Let’s Roll!

Get Alerts

COMMENTS

  • crassus

    Lisa Murkowski, who can not seriously be considered a centrist, needs to be defeated for re-election. She is definitely worse than Bob Bennett. However, since it is not a convention, it will be more difficult to beat her. Murkowski supports abortion, ObamaCare, (when convenient) cap-and-trade, citizenship for illegal aliens, tons of pork-barrell projects, TARP, and many other bad things.

    Miller on the other hand is a genuine conservative. Also, although some (AChance) have said he would have a hard time winning the general election, I am a bit skeptical. This is even more true in 2010.

    • Achance

      If Miller wins, they’ll put Ulmer or Knowles on in a millisecond and pour money into Alaska. RedState already helped put Begich in, might as well finish turning Alaska into a Blue state.

      • snowshooze

        I would like to hear more from Miller.
        And so far as Ulmer and Knowles, I doubt they would stand a great chance after having seen Begich in action.

        • Achance

          and was twice elected Governor. Launder a little Democrat money to somebody well to the right and you peel off enough to elect the Democrat. Worked for Knowles in 94 when the “true conservatives” backed Coghill and diluted the Campbell vote. And, when the Democrats can get close, they just count ‘em til they get ‘em right in the Bush.

          • trapperjohn

            There is hardly a dimes worth of difference between them. In fact, it wouldn’t surprise me to see Murky switch and run as a Democrat if she were to lose the primary. I doubt she can do that, but she wouldn’t have to change her principles much at all.

    • fbks

      Murkowski is not a conservative. Currently she is talking like one, here in Alaska, as she works on the so called Hawaiian Native rights with the Democrats, does not support repeal of Obamacare, ect.
      Just because there is an R by the name does not indicate you have a conservative candidate. I am tired of being presented watered down candidates to support and vote for or face the prospect of a progressive Democrat in the office.

  • pilgrim

    http://www.redstate.com/towdogincal/2010/07/21/what-does-it-mean-to-be-a-member-of-the-tea-party-caucus-if-you-vote-for-the-obama-agenda/

    Both warn there are going to be some who will try and jump on a bandwagon with a totally different agenda than conservatives. This is not to scare anyone, Just be aware of who is lurking.

    • eburke

      just blindly walk into the voting booth and reflexively voting for the incumbent, or for a candidate just because they have an R next to their name are over.

      And can’t let some loser like Jones sign up for the Tea Party Caucus as a fig leaf to cover his liberal votes and not call him out on it.

  • jcincy

    I am not sure where conservatives stand in regards to revealing and removing corruption in the GOP. I know that this nation stands on the brink…

    - Bush bought us some time in appointing quality judges during his 8 years. Sadly he was undercut by the gang of 14.
    - He bought us some time in fending off the mainstream Muslim terrorists.
    - The slaughter of the innocents was slowed, but sadly not vanquished during Bush’s time in office.
    - Unfortunately the GOP abandoned him, when he attempted to bring reform to Social Security.
    - We lost ground with some of the ‘compassionate’ programs and the pork barrel spending of Republicans and Democrats.
    - The bailouts were a total sell out and granted cover to the godless, socialist that took Bush’s place.

    The party and the nation took a wholesale beating in 2006 and 2008. Has the party learned? What’s at stake?

    The elections of 2010 will determine whether or not we can stalemate the drive to godless, socialism for just a little longer.

    The elections of 2012 may mark the tipping point in the battle between liberty and tyranny, between life and death.

    This day I call heaven and earth as witnesses against you that I have set before you life and death, blessings and curses. Now choose life, so that you and your children may live… — Deuteronomy 30:19

    • JamesSmith130

      1. Bush bought us some time in appointing quality judges during his 8 years. Sadly he was undercut by the gang of 14.

      He was undercut by the Democrats after 2007. Had we retained the Senate in 2007, then you could blame the Gang of 14, but even if the judicial filibuster was removed, we weren’t getting more judges after 2007.

      2. He bought us some time in fending off the mainstream Muslim terrorists.

      Yes. But here Bush make a mistake in not defining the enemy, it is not terrorism, which is a method, but Islam.

      3. The slaughter of the innocents was slowed, but sadly not vanquished during Bush?s time in office.

      Slowed slightly because of Bush’s policies. Hopefully Bush’s judges will bring this slaughter to an end.

      4. Unfortunately the GOP abandoned him, when he attempted to bring reform to Social Security.

      GOP didn’t abandon him. It was Democrat obstructionism and demagoguery that did it in.

      5. We lost ground with some of the ?compassionate? programs and the pork barrel spending of Republicans and Democrats.

      Agreed. But you can’t reform everything at once. Bush considered the WOT, judges, SS reform, and tax cuts/reform more important.

      6. The bailouts were a total sell out and granted cover to the godless, socialist that took Bush?s place.

      This was Bush’s and the GOP’s worst hour. It was a complete abdication of the principles of conservatives and Republicans.

  • Ausonius

    We have discussed this many times before. I wrote an essay here on how Conservatism is the “moderate” or centrist course:

    http://www.redstate.com/ausonius/2010/01/22/conservatism-is-moderate-let-us-stop-accepting-a-definition-from-the-left/

    The “compassionate conservatism” from W. Bush was simply another misguided attempt to play nicely with Dems, another foolish attempt at “bipartisanship” which led simply to more spending and more government and less freedom.

    One wonders why someone would bother joining the Republicans and then vote with Dems or start acting like Dems.

    An example: here in Ohio the Republican Party committed suicide under a supposedly Republican governor (Taft) and state legislature.

    Was out-of-control spending cut? No. It was expanded. Were taxes cut? See the last answer. Were needed reforms made to return Ohio to being a business-friendly state? No.

    Because the Ohio Republicans – once in power – acted like Dems. They became afraid of the press, afraid of the unions, afraid of being called “unfair”to minorities and the poor, and they choked.

    The beginning: CONSERVATIVE Republicans need to make the case that the best way to help the poor is to stop subsidizing their dependency. Drug addicts are not helped by being given free drugs. CONSERVATIVE Republicans need to make the case that forced socialization, forced quotas, forced “fairness” is actually a new oppression.

    If a government forces me to smile at you and pretend to respect you, what have you gained? But if you earn my respect or even friendship through proper moral behavior, then you have something honest and real and valuable.

    • E Pluribus Unum

      You don’t play nice with Democrats. You punch them in the mouth and show them who’s boss. And then if that does not work, you get mean.

      • Ausonius

        is with their own words!

        Quoting their own exact words about e.g. “no taxes on the middle class” and then contrasting that with their own words – and deeds – about creating “health-care taxes” and letting tax rates RISE in January by refusing to extend the W. Bush tax cuts would make an excellent campaign ad.

        They have provided the Republicans with hours of ads: all we have to do is organize the lies against what they actually have done.

        I have some 7th and 8th Graders able to handle that task cheaply via PowerPoint. :)

        Question: so…where are these ads???

  • lukematthews

    There is a great deal of divisionist talk out there. The LeftStream Media is trying desperately to drive a wedge amongst the GOP and conservative voters. Now is not the time to snipe and create problems. If we are able to retake the Senate, that will mean only 9 of 37 seats up for reelection will have been taken by the Democrats. By any measure, that is huge. The Left Stream Media had been tickled to death after the 2008 election because they commented on how many seats the Republicans had to defend this election. They thought they might even pick up a seat or two.
    This is not a horse-race. This is a full fledged fight for the leadership of the Senate. If the Republicans are able to pull out a take of the Senate, the Democratic Party will be cleaning out their pants all of 2011. They will then have 22 of the 33 contests to defend in 2012. It is then we can raise the bar. In the meantime, we do have to get Republicans as conservative as we can, but we also have to protect the republic from Obamanomics and crypto-socialist oligarchy.

    • pompadour

      it’s not just a fight against the Democrats and the radicals that have taken over that party. We need to understand absolutely clearly at this juncture that it’s equally a fight against PROGRESSIVISM–and that’s something you find loads of in the current ranks of the Republicans.

      Let’s take just a momentary look at but a few of our current “Republicans” in Washington: Lindsey Graham, Susan Collins, Richard Lugar, Olympia Snowe, and–the latest to join their wishy-washy ranks–Scott Brown. These people have become fairly reliable votes…not for conservative principles but instead for disastrous Democrat schemes like the Financial Regulation bill and a long list of others. Are we all glad they’re there? How much better have they been than a Democrat when it really mattered? So who the hell cares about that pretty little R next to their name? I sure don’t. Not one iota. It’s not Ds and Rs anymore. We have to look deeper.

      When it comes to the 2010 elections, candidates like Castle in Delaware, Kirk in Illinois, and Johnson in Wisconsin are just as dangerous as some of the folks on the Left. Why? Because they are willing to compromise on the Constitution and the principles it contains. However well-intentioned some of these people may be, this failing in them will inevitably result in their making many wrong decisions that will only compromise us further. We’ve seen this story before so many times. Why are we willing to risk it even once or twice or thrice more to see if a moderate candidate will work out for us THIS time? If they’ll vote the right way when we need them to do so? We are foolish to do so.

      eburke is right. The likelihood of getting a true conservative elected in every 2010 race is minimal. But we should ABSOLUTELY be attempting to discern and sort the wheat from the chaff among those who claim to be “Republican” or “conservative”–BEFORE those people get to Washington, not after, as is our long habit. And if that shakes things up: If it ruffles a few feathers…I have zero problem with that.

      • Achance

        The most important vote is the first one; the vote to elect a leader and form a caucus. Anyone who votes with the Ds to form a caucus and elect a Democrat Speaker or Senate President is my enemy, anyone who votes with the R caucus is my friend. I may disagree with my friend from time to time, and the Rs certainly need more caucus discipline, but the Snowes and Grahams, even the McCains are not my enemy.

      • mriggio

        So what would you have me do, vote for his D opponent instead? Not vote at all? Leave that line on the ballot blank? All result in a Democrat win, which must be prevented at all costs.

        Once the primary’s over, it’s time to GOTV for the R, and regroup for the next round of primaries. THAT’S where the battle’s won or lost, not in the General election. Like it or not, that’s how it is.

        Cheers!

        • Brian Hibbert

          While Kirk isn’t my ideal candidate, the choice is between him an Alexi Gianoulius. Therefor a KIRK for Senate sign will be in my yard this year.

          Giving this seat away to Gianoulious is NOT an option. Staying home or casting a 3rd party protest vote is just giving the seat to a corrupt progressive D. I can’t do that.

          Primaries are the time to fight ideological battles within the party. The general election is the time to vote for the Republican on the ballot.

  • http://www.hickpolitics.com Dave Poff (haystack)

    that, should centrism find a foothold again after the midterms, we will find ourselves (as a “party) right back where we started after we let them turn their backs on the ’94 resurrection.

    We didn’t hold them TO any of the promises they slowly diluted over that span of 10 or 12 years. What we, the people better do is continue paying attention…not just change the channel after the game “appears” won.

  • JadedByPolitics

    because when you vote for the GOP picked candidate you are picking playpals for Lindsey!

  • eburke

    conservatives as a whole kicked back and dropped the ball after ’04 (well, actually before that). We kicked back as if the game was over while the Dems went about plotting their resurrection.

    We cannot, we will not, we *must* not *ever* do that again.

  • liberalsrising

    The one thing that would tickle me if Tea Party candidates were to have some influence once they get to congress is for them to say “NO, I won’t take any money from any big corporation (especially) or union, or organization of small businesses, no money from anybody who wants to be my friend, influence me, gain access, show their appreciation.

    Our democracy today is corrupted by campaign money, primarily from large corporations. The only way to return America to the people is to get private or organizational money totally out of elections. The Tea Party are the people to do this and it would tickle me no end.

  • eburke

    case the Primary is still coming up in September.

    DE *can* elect a conservative, especially in this cycle. Castle’s so far left that it wouldn’t even surprise me to see him pull a Jim Jeffords if the balance of power in the Senate hangs in the balance.

    The only vote I expect from Kirk is the one for Majority Leader. I don’t even expect that from Castle.

  • JamesSmith130

    I have no problem supporting Kirk now and I wouldn’t support Castle even in the general.

  • http://www.examiner.com/x-1597-Charlotte-Law--Politics-Examiner Mike gamecock DeVine

    their kind. We, the GOP are going to win big the next few election cycles and their is no reason that conservatives shouldn’t dominate the GOP with tea partiers’ help! I’m rolling.

  • pirate55

    which has brought us to this point. See what the Centrist philosophy has earned the Republican Party and the people of a great nation to this point. I agree our work began the day after the presidential election of 2008 and may not end in some of our lifetimes.

    But the return to core conservative values will endure beyond each and every one of us as the liberals can at least be thanked for one of the greatest political awakenings in the history of our great country. Yes, the Republican Party must remain united yet acknowledge its’ conservative foundation and abide by that foundation.

    The Senators from Maine come to mind as centrist, and Mr. Devine’s beloved Lindsey Graham. Here in Florida we have endured Charlie Crist and a number of “career” centrist Republicans who need to go. Though they do the Republican Party as much harm as they do good, the conservative foundation of the party can and will endure as this awakening remains in its’ infancy.

    It is the responsibility of all of us to bring the awakening out of infancy and into productive citizenship. In other words, the message to our Centrist members, is that the light at the end of the tunnel you see is actually the locomotive of the righteous conservative faction of the political party you continue to distort, and either jump on that train, or be run over by it!