« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

MEMBER DIARY

A military perspective on the Taliban urination video

Political commentary on the video of Marines urinating on Taliban corpses has been somewhat muted, thankfully.  Those who have waded in mostly done so along predictable partisan lines.  Some Conservative commentators have taken the position that “war is hell” and our troops should always get our unconditional support, especially when it provides an opportunity t0 score points against the Obama Administration.  This viewpoint is misguided.  This is not a political issue, it is a military discipline issue, and it should be left to the Marine Corps to handle the way they always handle discipline issues.

War is hell, indeed.  But war is also the extension of politics by violence.  The way a war is fought reflects on the character of those fighting it, and can directly influence the attainment of political goals from the conflict.  Therefore, war must be conducted in a manner consistent with the strategic objectives and political identity of the country waging it.  In the case of the US, we are the good guys, and we expect our wars to be fought consistent with the values we embrace as Americans.  We go to war for just causes, and we expect our wars to be fought with a sense of justice.

It is easy for things to get out of hand during war, even for the good guys.  Wars are fought by young men, many in their teens and early twenties, with still developing values and character.  They are placed in an environment where life is cheap and death is common, and are forced to make life and death decisions.  It is too much for some of them, especially in a counterinsurgency environment, where guerrillas hide within the population and appear to benefit from their support.  Anger, frustration, opportunity, and capability can combine in dangerous and tragic ways.  War crimes happen in every war, by every country participating.

Military commanders are responsible to make sure that things do not get out of hand.  To keep things under control under extreme duress, they rely on discipline.  Discipline is doing what you should do when you do not want to do it, and not doing what you should not do when you want to do it.  It is resisting impulses and urges in favor of exercising self control.  Discipline is the core of military professionalism.  Discipline must be practiced until it becomes automatic, so that under extreme circumstances it will not fail.  Discipline gives young men under fire a framework to fall back on when things get confusing and ugly.  By following the rituals of military discipline, soldiers continually reinforce the habit of adherence to standards and policies.

Sometimes military discipline can seem trivial, but it is a method born of long experience.  Professional military leaders from the time of the legions know that the best way to avoid big offenses is to prevent small offenses.  Once you get used to flouting the rules, any rule or law can be flouted.  Small crimes can become large crimes.  Mistreatment of the dead can become mistreatment of the living.  It is a slippery slope from mistreatment to rape, murder, and pillage, and Americans are not immune.  Military discipline is what keeps us from going there.

The United States Marine Corps is one of the most disciplined military forces on earth.  But every organization has individuals that fail to meet standards, and the Marines are no exception.  This video was a serious breakdown of discipline.  Mistreatment of enemy or civilian remains, to include photographing or videoing enemy remains, is prohibited under US policy and expressly against general orders issued to all US military personnel in Afghanistan.  The offending Marines were certainly aware of these orders, but they chose to ignore them.  The Marine Corps will NEVER tolerate that.

This video was not an inconsequential act.  US troops will die because of this video, just as surely as if those Marines had deserted their posts.  In counterinsurgency, the core challenge is to build trust with the local population so that they will cooperate with local security efforts.  Much effort is expended to build this trust, and many US troops have died conducting operations to establish local security and build trust in the population.  Any act that undermines this trust undermines those operations and wastes the sacrifices of the troops who died to build trust.

Muslims have very strong beliefs on the proper treatment of their remains, even those of the enemy.  Mistreating corpses makes us seem like barbaric animals to the Afghan population we are trying to win the trust and cooperation of.  This video gives the Taliban easy propaganda to undermine our efforts, and will help them recruit more suicide bombers.

Some commentators have tried to excuse this incident by pointing to Patton pissing in the Rhine.  Equating the two acts is rather stupid, since Patton peed in a river, not on a corpse.  Beyond that, this argument displays a fundamental lack of understanding of who Patton was and how he behaved.  Patton was known for exceedingly strict military discipline; for example, he instituting fines for not shaving daily in combat, and he had military police patrol war zones to enforce uniform infractions such as not wearing leggings.  Beyond that, Patton was an avid practitioner of information warfare, with a keen appreciation for the effect of public gestures. Much of his flamboyant persona was a deliberate act to give his troops a larger than life image to rally around.  His pissing in the Rhine was exactly the kind of calculated grand gesture he was famous for.  Were he in command in Afghanistan, he would have been apoplectic at the pissing video, because of how it undermined his strategic goals there.  He also would not have tolerated disobedience of general orders.

Others have taken offense at public denunciations by Clinton and Panetta.  Those of us who consider ourselves strong supporters of the troops need to understand this: the Secretaries of State and Defense are doing their duty.  Our allies are watching closely, and potential partners in the Muslim world are watching closely.   The US must quickly and strongly denounce this act, or it will drag on forever.  It is Clinton and Panetta’s job to make a vigorous condemnation, then pivot smoothly to subjects more favorable to the US.  It’s Public Affairs 101, folks.

I understand and share the urge to “support the troops” unconditionally.  But your urge is misguided in this instance.  What those Marines did has endangered their fellow Marines who are still in combat, who will now have to deal with extra RPGs sent their way by newly recruited insurgents who think we routinely piss on Muslim corpses.  Support those Marines, not the idiots who have made their job harder.

The bottom line is that the Marine Corps cannot and will not tolerate this kind of indiscipline.  They will move swiftly and decisively to punish those responsible.  That punishment will take place within the Universal Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), administered bya military judge and jury, and it will be consistent with the Marine Corps standards of discipline.  Most importantly, the outcome will be the same whether the President is a Democrat or a Republican.  The rest of us should keep that in mind and not fan the flames on this issue further.  Let the process work.

COMMENTS

  • avgjo

    And thank you for your service.

  • weyland

    n/t

  • Don T.

    I do think that the comments made by SecDef Panetta and by SecState Clinton were too strident by far. Their words were too harsh, making it seem that these admittedly awful actions by some young Marines was the worst war crime so far in the war. They were not, and that was an elevation of the incident that was not warranted. I think it’s regrettable that these two officials were so harsh. They both should have been more even handed, while appropriately condemning the actions of these young Marines. It would have also been very nice if both of these officials, who should know better, would have made sure to say this was an uncharacteristic incident and that the vast majority, 99.9 % of soldiers and Marines, do in fact act correctly and with decorum on the battlefield. (If Panetta and Clinton said those things, I will retract that, but I haven’t seen news accounts that they said this.)

    Having said all that, your comments otherwise are spot on.

  • http://lukos.com Ed54

    Read the actual words for yourself:

    PANETTA: “I have not gotten, you know, a firm conclusion. The indication from the commandant of the Marines is that it appeared to be valid and appeared to be a real video of what took place.

    But I think we’re still waiting for, you know, a firm confirmation if that’s the case.

    But you know, my view is, and I said it today, that that kind of behavior is deplorable, and I condemn it because it does not represent the kind of standards and values that the U.S. military and those in uniform are sworn to — the kind of values and standards that they’re sworn to uphold.

    And so what I’ve ordered is the commandant of the Marines and General Allen, who represents our forces in Afghanistan, to immediately conduct an investigation to determine exactly what happened and to hold those individuals accountable.

    You know, I have to say, the vast — the vast, vast majority of our men and women in uniform do not behave in that manner, that they are, you know, that they really uphold the highest standards of our military, and that there will always be a few — always be a few — that will do deplorable and disgusting things like what we saw.

    But I don’t think you should use that as a basis on which to indicate that across the board there are, you know, problems that undermine what the military is doing. These are isolated incidents.

    But having said that, it doesn’t make it any less deplorable. And my responsibility is to make sure that those involved in that kind of behavior are — that we conduct an investigation and that we hold them accountable.”

    CLINTON: “I want to express my total dismay at the story concerning our Marines, who I have the highest respect and admiration for, but I share completely the views expressed by Secretary Panetta earlier today. I join him in condemning the deplorable behavior that is reflected in this video. It is absolutely inconsistent with American values, with the standards of behavior that we expect from our military personnel, and that the vast vast majority of our military personnel, particularly our Marines, hold themselves to. So I know that Secretary Panetta has ordered a complete investigation of this incident, and anyone, anyone found to have participated or known about it, having engaged in such conduct, must be held fully accountable.”

    What part of all that do you disagree with?

  • Don T.

    that the two secretaries just were too strident in their condemnation. I stand corrected, and it is good that they did give credit to the vast majority of soldiers and Marines who do behave correctly. It is only my opinion, but I think they just went overboard in their remarks. A bit more perspective would have been welcome, instead of making the incident out to be some kind of crime against humanity. It amounted to some young Marines doing something very dumb, something for which they will be punished, and I’m sure they will get fairly serious punishment. All I would suggest is, yes, condemn the incident, but they could have toned it down some.

  • Justin_Case

    and it ain’t the Taliban.

    I’m positive, given the nature of guerrilla fighting, that many innocent Afghan people are killed and maimed as a result of IEDs set in place by the Taliban.

    As a result of our Rules of Engagement our enemy thinks nothing of setting up gun emplacements or storing ammunition among the civilian populace.

    The various rules we have constricted ourselves with, beginning in in Vietnam, cost American lives while emboldening our enemy. That’s what I think of when I read of your concerns.

    I would understand your concerns and place more importance on them if I (and the rest of the world) was not aware of Taliban and al Qaida atrocities that are done as a matter of POLICY.

    I firmly believe that the ordinary Afghan villager is smart enough to differentiate between American conduct of war, and its occasional lapses, and the brutal actions of the Taliban. I’m guessing that the Soviet invasion, with its brutality and lack of regard for Afghan civilians receives a few paragraphs in history books in that region of the world.

    As for Ms. Clinton, your quote does not capture the shrillness of the person we all know voted to give President Bush the authority to ultimately wage war, only to change her mind as a matter of convenience. Her change in position was a luxury that is not granted to the men and women fighting on the ground. The real irony is that she is now in position to cast judgment on these same troops.