« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

Is it Okay to Vote Against a Candidate Because of His Race?

There is a double standard in the media's handling of that question that needs some attention

UPDATED and BUMPED: According to the Politico late yesterday, the Democrats have denied a request by Cohen for money to fight off Nikki Tinker. But, the Congressional Black Caucus has given Nikki Tinker $5,000.00 and additional fundraising support from Stephanie Tubbs Jones.


The answer to the question is no. It is, in fact, the only acceptable answer and if you think otherwise, RedState is not a good fit for you.

But I ask the question because it raises an important point about the media, the Democrats, and Barack Obama himself.

We are, each year, treated to national media reports on race relations in this country and they invariably discuss white America coming to terms with other races in this country. Very, very rarely does the media ever report on other races coming to terms with white America.

It is not really relevant, frankly, to point out that most black voters are going to vote in droves for Barack Obama. Regardless of his race, black voters would vote for the Democrat. But when you read about Congressman Steve Cohen’s race in Tennessee’s Ninth Congressional District, you really are confronted by both racism and anti-semitism in a way we rarely think about in this country. And the media is silent. Barack Obama is silent.

Steve Cohen just might lose his re-election not because he has been ineffective in representing his district, but because he is white. And a number of black members of Congress are happy about that.


The media’s attention to this race is in direct contrast to Harold Ford, Jr. in 2006. The Republican Party ran an ad in Tennessee in which a white blonde lady ends the ad saying she met Harold at the Playboy mansion. The Ford camp immediately decried the ad as racist and the media nodded their head, likewise decrying the ad as racist. In fact, the hyperbolic scream of “racism” against the ad probably helped Corker more than the ad itself by hacking off voters who saw no racism in the ad. The voters, in fact, knew it was slamming Ford for his bachelor ways, hanging out with Playboy bunnies instead of representing his district.

What is happening to Steve Cohen is real racism and there are no prominent national media stories about it. Let me be clear here: Steve Cohen and I disagree on probably 99% of all issues. The point, though, is that the national media is all too willing to run stories of racism involving Republicans and then run as fast as they can in the other direction when the racism involves not just Democrats, but reverse racism.

In 2006, Steve Cohen won Harold Ford’s seat in Memphis in a bitter contested race. Cohen beat Nikki Tinker barely. During the race, Cohen hacked off black ministers for supporting gay rights legislation and opposing school prayer. But what angered people in the district more was that a black congressman could potentially be replaced by not just a white man, but a Jew too. The anti-Semitism has resurfaced this year. Black ministers (started by one who is not even in district) have passed out fliers that say “Steve Cohen and the JEWS HATE Jesus.” Nikki Tinker has refused to denounce the fliers.

Last year, some black ministers caused a stir against Cohen because he supported federal hate crimes legislation that included gay rights. Robert Poindexter, one of the angered ministers, gave away the game saying, “He’s not black and he can’t represent me, that’s just the bottom line.”

In fact, Nikki Tinker’s campaign is openly courting the race issue by saying the Tennessee delegation, which is all white, needs “diversity.” She is finding support with black members of Congress who denied Steve Cohen membership in the Congressional Black Caucus after his 2006 victory. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-OH), according to Congressman Cohen, is actively helping Nikki Tinker because they are both black and female. Tubbs Jones coyly claims it is because Tinker is a sorority sister in Delta Sigma Theta, a black sorority.

But it’s not just Tubbs Jones. As Chris Bodenner points out, of the 42 members of the Congressional Black Caucus, only Charlie Rangel, John Conyers, and Jesse Jackson, Jr. have been willing to support Congressman Cohen. All 42, however, signed on to Congressman Cohen’s successfully passed resolution apologizing for slavery and Jim Crow laws.

And where is Barack Obama? Steve Cohen got on board early with Obama’s campaign. Nikki Tinker only did after Hillary was toast. Neither campaign thinks Obama will weigh in, but why not?

In Georgia, Obama gladly taped a radio commercial for Congressman John Barrow in the 12th Congressional District. Barrow looks conservative next to Cohen. In fact, Barrow, a Blue Dog Democrat, was opposed by most left-wing organization in his primary challenge by Regina Thomas, a prominent black state senator for Savannah. Seventy percent of the ballots in the Democratic primary in Georgia-12 are generally cast by black voters; yet, Barack Obama was willing to weigh in for the white guy.

In Tennessee-9, Barack Obama has remained silent. He could, of course, practice what he preaches. He could transcend race and help the healing. Barack Obama could weigh in publicly for Steve Cohen. Barack Obama could denounce the anti-semitism and racism (and blatant sexism) being hurled toward a sitting congressman.

Barack Obama cannot say this is a matter for the voters of Tennessee. He established a precedent in Georgia in a race that had no strong racist attacks against the white incumbent Congressman.

So why be silent now? And why is the media silent? The only major national media organization to look into this issue has been the Washington Post, and then only via an online blog.

Either the media and Barack Obama really care about this issue, or they use it just as a political weapon against Republicans. The silence is deafening.

COMMENTS

  • Neil_Stevens
  • scottbomb

    In the polls I heard, Obama was pulling 90% of the black vote against Hillary who had a lot more experience and (in my opinion) qualifications.

    Of course, race had nothing to do with it. wink

  • spainishirish

    I did contract work down in Memphis during the 2006 election, and my office was in a section of Midtown that is in the Ninth District. That indeed was a racist, virulently anti-Semitic campaign. In part, this was due to the departure of Harold Ford, Jr., from that hereditary seat to run statewide for Senate. Some of the hatred was just blatant prejudice. A black co-worker, whose brother happened to be in the congregation the day it happened, said Rep. Cohen was called a Jew bastard from the pulpit. I had no reason to doubt the guy, given the tenor of the campaign.

    I’ve kept in contact with co-workers in western Tennessee, and apparently the campaign against Cohen never stopped. Even his blatant pandering, such as the reparations bill, is dismissed because of his ethnic background.

    As to your question about the media silence, it certainly was obvious in 2006. My guess is that given how nasty the campaign was, the MSM types were afraid voters in other areas of Tennessee would be appalled to see how politics sometimes are played in Memphis and all the time by the Ford family. Now, of course, this type of bigotry cannot be reported because it runs counter to the media narrative about the sainthood of Obama and the latent racism that compels people not to support him.

    My money is Cohen loses and Obama never utters a word.

  • StephC

    Nor apparently has it helped Cohen being white yelling racism, whether it is or not, will help him even less.

    Ford didn’t lose because of that ad or for yelling racism. He lost because not one, but two, of his family members were indicted and/or being investigated for corruption. A lot of people were wondering how far from the tree that apple fell. Running for Senate is a whole different ballgame because it involves the whole state, not a particular district.

    If Cohen is losing his seat simply because he’s white in a predominantly black district… well… I suppose one can speculate that the predominantly black would rather be racially pure regardless of the corruption of the politicians. I know nothing of this Nikki Tinker, so I may be speculating something that isn’t true particularly of her, but there is still the racism factor.

    If I were to say that a candidate isn’t white and couldn’t possibly represent me, the press and everybody would be all over the statement. If they want true equality then they’re going to have to ditch the double standards.

  • Wisecracker

    Highly recommended.

  • Susannah

    By the way, Scottbomb is right about the Democratic primary. Obama falsely accused the Clintons of racism, and he has already insinuated that the GOP will use racist attacks against him. I recently wrote a blog that details, in part, this subject (linked below). I would recommend reading the Pat Buchanan and the Fox News columns, specifically, which are linked in my blog.

    On a side note, to me, it is unconscionable to falsely accuse your opponents of racism, but then turn a blind eye when one of your supporters is the victim of undeniable bigotry.

    Oh, and Spainishirish’s post on this thread is also very interesting and informative. :-)

    [Barack Obama--the Master of Illusion]
    (http://www.redstate.com/diaries/susannah/2008/jul/19/barack-obama-the-master-of-illusion/)

  • RE_Finch

    My big question is not “Is it Okay to Vote Against a Candidate Because of His Race?” As I see it, we’re never going to get beyond campaign nastiness like we see in the Cohen/Tinker match-up so long as we countenance race or ethnicity being emphasized at all.

    Yes, its disturbing when the clamor about it is mostly raised by people wedded to a form of contemporary anti-racism more pernicious than any racism practiced today; the one that deems people guilty for the actions of their ancestors in perpetuity, unless, of course, they can claim some sort of victimhood; then they’re off the hook. But how are we to condemn this sort of selectivity when we follow and help and root for others who practice the same, in slightly different form?

    So, my question is: Why do we go along with campaigns that seek to increase the level of ethnocentrism in our nation by calculating campaign initiatives that intentionally carve out and promise specific program or legislative goodies for the benefit particular ethnocentric interests? So long as our politics is one of divisive, ethnic promise-making, we shall remain mired in racist concerns and questions.

    Perhaps this all goes back to the fact that concept of racism was first articulated by the left and particularly crafted for its own designs. And here we are today, decrying one aspect of this leftist creation while adopting another. How absurd is it that what’s happening to Cohen is bad, but engaging in a softer version of the same via racial and ethnic pandering is okay?

    We should reject both tactics.

  • dumdems

    dic head obama is the poster man for black racists in America..Rev. Wright..Farrakan..Sharpton..Jackson..etc…. he unites haters and will tear down our country..now rapper ludacrious has made a song glorifying HATE…”they who exalt themselves shall be made humble”..85% of Americans are non-black..and their patience is coming to an end..

  • SteveLA

    I’m not sure what the record for soiling the carpet is, but this one is pretty darn good for a “Gorilla in the Mist” sort of troll.

  • aaronbg

    n/t

  • Moe_Lane

    So scram.

  • SteveLA

    Here’s the issue I personally have with the whole “white guilt, if you don’t support Obama you’re a racist” vibe.

    Speaking for those of us who have suffered at the hands of aggressive affirmative action, forced school busing and other nasty race based social justice stuff from the late 60′s and early 70′s, I have a hard time feeling guilty about holding a high standard for evaluating who I am hiring to lead this country.

    I’m not feeling the least bit unhappy or feeling guilty at all based on my race or background.

    Nobama is not automatically qualified, nor disqualified for this job, and I reject those that will tell me that I am supposed to look beyond the object racism expressed by over a 90 percent Black vote for Obama, which ignores his qualifications, and voting record.

    If people want to claim that hard scrutiny of job seekers is something that should be abandoned in favor of some notion of racial balance, got news for them, I’m not buying. I don’t buy for the most part affirmative action, and selecting someone for the number one job in the Federal government I sure as heck am not going to start liking affirmative action for ether.

    I do not find Obama qualified for the job, nor do I agree with 99 percent of his positions, no matter what the color of his skin is.

  • gamecock

    1

  • dbecraft

    Since almost 90% (blacks) + vote race, are the rest of us suppose to ignore the results? Yes, I do believe that voting should be without racist prejudice, but that will come when Republican blacks are elected.

    To assume that the rest of the world does not follow racist attitudes is just silly but it is politically correct!

  • cbollesjr

    Look – the world thinks the USA is a racist country. We proove it all the time with our NAACP, the Push coalition, Rainbow, Sharpton, Jessie, you name it. America has moved backwards in race realations. Obama is not going to touch this Memphis afair and he is smart in (not) doing so. Memphis has been run by the Ford machine for decades and they are unhappy to say the least about being de-throned. Any whitey will be toast as the recent Ford defeat was an anomoly. Facts are facts. When black America votes in lock step in one direction over 90% it isn’t a trend, it is a river current. As long as this country continues its guilt trip for slavery and Jim Crow, we will not go forward. I love in the south and the war is still fresh. Our schools are abismal and all politics are racial – especially local. We tried to make it up to “them” by giving them free housing, breakfasts, lunches, etc. and it only ended up saying, “You are incapable of doing this yourself. We feel bad about the past, let us do it for you.” Liberalism is racist and it expresses this through welfare/war on poverty failing programs. The enemy is us, my friends.

    Thankfully, there are those, like Bill Cosby on the national scene, who know what has gone wrong, and it isn’t just whitey’s fault. Whitely is somewhat to blame though – those liberal whitey’s that is.

    I am sorry for Mr. Cohen. But he is 100 years too early. We Americans are going to wear our racism like a badge for years to come.

  • dbecraft

    I doubt that racism will diminish in the next 30 years or so, not because of whites, but because of blacks. The problem today is not white racism, but black racism and it is aggravated by the white (Congress) actions to alleviate racism.

    Interesting isn’t it that the cause of today’s racism is yesterdays racism. It will not change regardless of who is in (office) charge. Blacks will always feel suppressed (seems built in these days). It is simply a matter of minority over majority… In this case, the minority will always win…(same with the Mexican minority) until America wakes up to the problems…

    Racism is a wonderful word (mostly used by the MSM) and is used regardless of the circumstances. It’s high time that they were held accountable for their language.

  • dbecraft

    less racist than most European counties. We just try to respond to the issues rather than hide them from view…

    You really don’t want to look at these issues in Europe… else, you will bring actual racist issues to the fore…

  • stickler88

    The sort of sentiment that you cite:

    So why be silent now? And why is the media silent?

    is precisely the reason why:

    most black voters are going to vote in droves for Barack Obama.

    The GOP may not be thrilled, but this is the proverbial big time for a large segment of voters that previously felt put-out by the process in general.

    I blame it on not enough time spent explaining the Laffer Curve by President Bush during his frequent Fireside Talks.