« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

The Gang of 10 Harms America, Not Just the GOP

This morning on the radio I read EPU’S post, Kevin’s post, and Gamecock’s citation of Texas Ace’s comment.

There is a common trait in each post that Texas Ace sums up quite well.

By caving now, Saxby Shambles and Little Lord Fauntleroy, (as Doc calls him) have bailed them out of their predicament at the exact moment when the Republican party is on the brink of victory. This wouldn’t be so infuriating were it the first time they have done this but it’s not. They always time their capitulation at times that either cause maximum damage to the Republican Party or as in this case…to bail out the Democrats at a time when Republicans are winning!

Rush, in fact, makes a similar point talking with Saxby Chambliss. The GOP is winning on this issue. The Gang of 10 compromise takes away the only issue on which the GOP is winning.

That focus, internally, is okay. But we should also keep in mind that the Gang of 10 compromise harms the national interest even more than it harms the GOP interest.

National Interest vs. the GOP’s Interest

There is widespread agreement that the OCS off Florida and California have the largest untapped oil and natural gas reserves. Opening up Virginia, the Carolinas, Georgia and the Florida Gulf Coast is a canard. Exhibit A is this. Knowledgeable geologists say there is no oil accessible off the Georgia coast, except in a marine reserve that this compromise won’t allow access to. While the Gulf of Mexico reserves off Florida will be accessible, the Atlantic side will not be. We’re already getting a good bit out of the Gulf. We need the Atlantic.

The GOP members of the gang are also happy to yank tax incentives for oil companies that other companies get. They are, in fact, buying into the anti-oil industry myth that accuses the oil industry of being too rich. No matter than the oil industry only makes 7 cents per dollar sold of gas.

More so, the Gang of 10 seems somehow to believe that by giving huge incentives for alternative energy, we will somehow abandon our addiction to oil overnight. While this is an appropriate long term strategy, we need short term relief.

Saxby Chambliss told Rush Limbaugh that by merely talking about this issue, the price of a barrel of oil has plummeted. Assuming that is true, which really isn’t the safest assumption, but assuming that is true, imagine how much more the price of a barrel of oil would fall if we expanded drilling through the OCS and tapped our shale oil reserves — another something this legislation does not allow (it also does not address ANWR).

Doing nothing is better than the compromise

The sad fact is that by doing nothing, Congress will leave the nation better off than it will by acting on the Gang of 10′s compromise. By doing nothing, the Congressional ban on OCS exploration and drilling will lapse for the entire United States, not just Virginia, the Carolinas, and Georgia.

Saxby Chambliss, John Thune, Bob Corker, Johnny Isakson, and Lindsey Graham didn’t just throw their party under the bus for a politically convenient compromise. They threw the short and long term interests of the American people and our national security under the bus.

This plan does nothing to alleviate our dependence on the Middle East.

COMMENTS

  • Brandozilla

    normally I am on board with such compromises, but their timing could not have been worse, politically.

  • bs

    What the HELL is going on down there?

    You’d like to think that a public official at that level has an IQ higher than flat-line. This is just beyond believable. These guys must have been brain-damaged by going on 2 years of Democrat control. Un-frickin’ believable.

  • Martin_A_Knight

    I really cannot figure out how it is possible that these five idiots could have failed to miss the laughter at their expense when they signed on to this.

    The fools probably thought their five Democrat gang members were laughing with them, not at them.

  • JSobieski

    is that they don’t seem to understand any of the following:

    (1) The GOP currently has a stronger hand on the issue–the dems will give in eventually (meaning before the election)
    (2) The proposed “compromise” is designed to solely to give democrats cover and deflate the issue
    (3) The proposed “compromise” will not result in drilling, and to the contrary will further enshrine non-drilling into an additional layer of cement.

    From now on, people who can’t think more than one move ahead need to follow those who can.

    The fact that GOP motivation is to increase drilling doesn’t mean the compromise proposal will achieve that goal. These people have reasoning processes that resemble liberals, which is another scary log to add to the fire.

    Corker was part of this bunch, and I thought he was better than that.

  • Cheetah772

    I’m interested in what McCain has to say on this compromise. I suppose if I were McCain and I sensed that the majority of Americans want unrestricted offshore drilling, then I’d go out in public and denounce this compromise. That should hearten and reassure most Americans.

    Furthermore, if this bill got to Bush’s office, he should veto it. Bush could help this by sending a clear message to Americans that it’s high time to permit unrestricted offshore drilling. Any kind of compromise compromises America’s national security interests and does nothing to reduce gasoline prices at pump drastically.

  • LDahl752

    and, I can’t believe these 5 senators are doing this now. People are so much on the same page with what’s been going on in the House. FINALLY, there are some Republicans who found their spines and are calling the Dems, especially Pelosi, what they really plan on NOT DOING. They (the Dems) have been so blinded by the environmentalists they have no idea what is actually good for the American people. They want us to ride bicycles or walk, neither of which will help with the rising prices of everything else that includes the costs of transportation.

    They are clueless about economics. Most in Congress are. But, here we have an issue that resonates with the people and these dimwits are casting it aside. Yes, it hurts the GOP; but, I agree, Erick, it causes immeasurable harm to the country.

  • Jvette

    they should watch the great American relay win from the Olympics. Maybe they would learn that team work is the best way to get a win and that even if you are behind, never, never, never give up. Dig deep, find the will to win and then just do it.

  • aceintx

    Gamecock’s citation of Texas Ace’s comment.

    I know I’m the village idio…er…malcontent…but what’s a guy gotta do to get direct attribution around here…LOL

    Seriously…thank you for noticing my points and using them…and thank you GC for bringing them to everyone’s attention.

  • Samsara

    The New Energy Reform Act immediately opens drilling where proven oil reserves are, the gulf. Florida’s coast is given reasonable protection, but Florida can’t veto the drilling. McCain has said he wants to lift the drilling ban and allow states, including Florida, to decide if they want drilling or not.

    The “Gang of 10″ plan at least requires that the west coast of Florida be opened up. Florida can?t say no. So the compromise guarantees new oil fields. If States decide, then there will be no drilling off the North East or West Coast. Only the South has shown interest, and they can allow drilling under the plan.

    I think we need to invest in alternative energy, especially nuclear. The gang?s plan invests 84 billion in developing energy independence. It closes tax exemptions for oil companies to help pay for it. The oil companies will pass this tax on to me. Not pleasant, but better than adding it to the deficit.

    The plan is a good one, and Senator McCain should negotiate what he can and then sign on. The fact that Republicans in the House have nothing else to run on is their own fault.

    Delaying action in order to use energy security as a political football is bad for America, and those suggesting it are further damaging the GOP brand.

    http://conrad.senate.gov/pressroom/record.cfm?id=301684&

  • Jaded

    such as yourself that hurts the GOP brand…there does not need to comity on this issue as the American public wants to Drill Here and Drill Now….and the 84 billion for developing energy independence what does that mean? Is that 84 billion for a bunch of scientists to come up with something….we have been promised the golden goose for over 3 decades and all of sudeen in 08 with 84 billion dollars of mine and others tax dollars is going to pan out? uhh no it will be an egg…period.

    This is an issue that Republicans can run on and win with and for McCain to buy into the compromise will put him back to square one with conservatives because he has done that before with judges and oh how has that worked out?

    The Democrats NEVER compromise and neither should Republicans.

  • Dave_in_Fla

    Bills have to pass both houses.

    Limiting off shore to only 4 states is silly, especially since two of those states have no likely fields.

    Eliminates 2 of the best known areas for exploration, California and Alaska.

    Raises taxes to provide breaks for technologies that don’t need them. Nukes will be built if the regulations are lifted.

    Places too many enviromental restrictions on the use of technology proven to be safe.

    Your snarky comment about the House is particularly offensive, since there are many viable energy bills in the House that the Speaker refuses to allow to be debated or voted upon.

    Yeilding the political initiative will result in a bad result, especially when the will of the people is so strong in favor of increased production. The gang of 5 has made a huge mistake and should back away.

  • walter_hanson

    Okay:

    I sent emails to all five of the Republican Senators. So far just an aide to Senator Chambliss has bothered to reply. I sent him a reply back.
    Of course Chambliss aide thought Chambliss was brilliant on Rush’s show.

    To the points raised by the person who supports the Gang of 10 plan.

    The people of Alaska want to drill. They accept the risk. So why can’t we drill in ANWR? It’s a million barrells of oil per day. Opening the strategic reserve will exhaust the whole reserve in less than two years if we used just a million barrells per day.

    Okay if Republicans are corrupted by big oil why aren’t Democrats corrupted by Environment. It seems like the Democrats are doing exactly what the environmental people are paying for.

    Walter Hanson
    Minneapolis, MN

  • walter_hanson

    Okay:

    I sent emails to all five of the Republican Senators. So far just an aide to Senator Chambliss has bothered to reply. I sent him a reply back.
    Of course Chambliss aide thought Chambliss was brilliant on Rush’s show.

    To the points raised by the person who supports the Gang of 10 plan.

    The people of Alaska want to drill. They accept the risk. So why can’t we drill in ANWR? It’s a million barrells of oil per day. Opening the strategic reserve will exhaust the whole reserve in less than two years if we used just a million barrells per day.

    Okay if Republicans are corrupted by big oil why aren’t Democrats corrupted by Environment. It seems like the Democrats are doing exactly what the environmental people are paying for.

    Walter Hanson
    Minneapolis, MN

  • walter_hanson

    Okay:

    I sent emails to all five of the Republican Senators. So far just an aide to Senator Chambliss has bothered to reply. I sent him a reply back.
    Of course Chambliss aide thought Chambliss was brilliant on Rush’s show.

    To the points raised by the person who supports the Gang of 10 plan.

    The people of Alaska want to drill. They accept the risk. So why can’t we drill in ANWR? It’s a million barrells of oil per day. Opening the strategic reserve will exhaust the whole reserve in less than two years if we used just a million barrells per day.

    Okay if Republicans are corrupted by big oil why aren’t Democrats corrupted by Environment. It seems like the Democrats are doing exactly what the environmental people are paying for.

    Walter Hanson
    Minneapolis, MN

  • Whitehorse

    I sent a respectful but firm message to him regarding this “compromise.” This is not what we who supported him were looking for. We did not endure the slings and arrows from Ford Jr. supporters, who called us every “ist” in the book for this. I asked him to withdraw from this gang.

    He has been pretty good so far, though this is a black mark. I hope he & the others reconsider this quickly. We need sane energy policy that will get us off of foreign oil dependence sooner rather than later – or never.

  • aceintx

    They don’t call it a windfall profits tax because that is a negative with the American People…they play the Washington game with this by putting lipstick on the same ole pig and sticking it out there…The worse thing you could do now is add $84 billion onto the price of refining and delivering gas to the pump and that’s what this would do since Corporations don’t pay taxes…they pass them onto consumers as an expense of doing business!

    Erick has a post up on the front page The House Protest is Working: Pelosi Folding Like a Cheap Tent! that’s showing we are winning everything we want on this issue, (as I predicted BTW) and the last thing we need right now is a compromise. Little Lord Fauntleroy and Saxby Shambles can take their gang of ten capitulation and shove it…and I for one won’t forget their betrayal

  • gamecock

    nt