« BACK  |  PRINT

RS

EDITOR OF REDSTATE

George McGovern Comes Out Swinging Against Card Check

Mark Impomeni has a great piece over at AOL about Obama and the Democrats wanting to pay back union support by getting card check passed.

“Card Check”, typically referred to by Democrats in Orwellian fashion as the “Employee Free Choice Act,” would require that employees vote for or against unionizing while standing in front of union thugs without a secret ballot.

Tonight, during the 2nd debate, George McGovern — yep, the far left former Presidential candidate George McGovern — is going to take to the airwaves in opposition to card check.

You can see his ad here. He does a good job.

COMMENTS

  • Pomme

    My dad is unable to believe he is on the same side as George McGovern and Bill Clinton this election cycle.

    It’s creepy!!

  • Charles_Beauchamp

    is Obama that he is taking positions to the left of McGovern?

  • LoneStarLibertarian

    McGovern is also against Democrats’ attempt to outlaw payday loans because, as he has eloquently written, while those loans carry high interest rates they end up amounting to a less expensive option than racking up NSF fees or maybe losing a job because there wasn’t enough money to get a vehicle fixed so a person can get to work.

    For McGovern’s significant faults, he seems to be in favor of at least some economic and political freedom, still. It’s amazing that these positions could put him to the right of his party on economic matters.

  • Robert_L_Mayo

    It’s 36 years late, but I can now truthfully say that I admire George McGovern.

    An honest man who puts what’s right above partisan politics. It almost makes me want to vote for him.

    …Almost.

  • glenn2m

    Must be a racist.

  • MelZ

    behind this? Perhaps I should re-phrase….?
    Someone please explain the liberal’s perceived/pretend rational behind this policy? Why does it matter? Why would they push for this?
    I realize they are pushing for it because they get so much money from unions, but surely they have some sort of “reasoning” they are articulating for this ridiculous nonsense.

  • larueladue

    Senator McGovern sounds like the Democrats I was raised to believe in, as a youngster (if they ever truly existed).

    Shows how far off the reservation the current incarnation of the Democrat Party has wandered…

  • Achance

    Unions can’t organize employees, employers can. An act by the employer that the employees don’t like catalyzes the employees, the union shows up and picks up representation cards. If they can get 30% or more, the NLRB or the state’s labor relations agency orders and election in which 50% plus one of those voting must vote to have the union as their exclusive representative for collective bargaining.

    As soon as the Agency certifies the “showing of interest” of 30% or more, the employer will usually challenge the definition of the bargaining unit and the validity of the cards. Are some of the card signers in a different craft? Are some supervisors or temporary employees? And on, and on; there’s a lot of tools in the kit. The employer uses the the legal system to delay the election as long as possible. The catalyzing event recedes in people’s minds, there is employee turnover (sometimes with a little help from the employer), there’s an economic downturn. Over time, the employees lose their ardor for the union and the union loses the election. Or, the union wins the election and the employer does every thing it legally, and sometimes not so legally, can to avoid reaching an agreement during the one year period in which the union is insulated from a challenge to its majority status. After the one year is up, the employer says it has a good faith doubt of majority, the employees have lost interest or have become convinced that the union is impotent, and the organizing drive fades away.

    This is really the WalMart bill. WalMart has put most of the legacy, unionized retailers out of business and has “union avoidance” down. HRC’s time on WalMart’s board probably has as much to do with her defeat as anything else. The unions see the “card check” legislation as a way to organize WalMart.

    I actually don’t think that WalMart will loose all its weapons to defeat this, may even welcome if not endorse it. Like the automakers and other legacy industries before them, WalMart doesn’t really care what its labor costs are except as they compare to its competitors. They can just pass the labor costs on so long as none of their competitors have a labor cost advantage.

    Unlike auto and aerospace, the retailers do not have foreign low-cost competitors except in the ecommerce field. The ecommerce advantage is largely a creature of the tax laws, an advantage easily rectified by a few tweaks in the tax laws. Welcome to France!

  • shawng

    I never thought I’d see the day I applaud George McGovern.

    tips hat Well done, sir.