<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RS 2009: Where should we go.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.redstate.com/erick/2008/11/26/rs-2009-where-should-we-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2008/11/26/rs-2009-where-should-we-go/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 23:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hammer2008</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2008/11/26/rs-2009-where-should-we-go/#comment-2823</link>
		<dc:creator>Hammer2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2823</guid>
		<description>&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Redstate should establish a presence on internet radio.  I think of &lt;a href="http://www.wsradio.com/"&gt;WS Radio&lt;/a&gt;, which is hosting Sarah Palin radio on Monday's (for example).  They are the worldwide leader in internet radio.  A downloadable one-hour/week beginning presence would be a start (interviews, call-ins, etc.)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;With expanding 3G and coming 4G technologies, Redstate.tv should have been bought and ready for launch.  It would allow feeds on phones as well as standard Web delivery.  Reasons resonate in Erick's points above, to include reporting from the grassroots (uploading video clips, etc.) whereapon anything could be brought in.  Local candidate interviews live by locals for RS endorsement, support, etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;I dig the idea of a slightly more personalized diary where we could display our own Top-5 blogroll, etc.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Can I get a simple print friendly feature with the option of with/without comments?  There are times I just want to print and share with co-workers, friends, ya' know, put 'education' in their own hands for follow-up and follow-through.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Establishing a '50 targets' in '50 states' congressional list.  Heck, make it votable, whereas the conservative/libertarian grassroots could highlight weaknesses in blue dog Dem's and other districts.  A sort of grassroots bottom-up review vice RNC-driven model.  Both could unofficially meet in the middle (*see CPAC conference recommendation).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;What would be the plausability of a RedState sponsored Right Root's convention???&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://larrytemple.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/declaration_of_independence_by_john_trumbull.jpg?w=449&#38;h=294" alt="Founding Fathers" title="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ol>
<li>
<p>Redstate should establish a presence on internet radio.  I think of <a href="http://www.wsradio.com/">WS Radio</a>, which is hosting Sarah Palin radio on Monday&#8217;s (for example).  They are the worldwide leader in internet radio.  A downloadable one-hour/week beginning presence would be a start (interviews, call-ins, etc.)</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>With expanding 3G and coming 4G technologies, Redstate.tv should have been bought and ready for launch.  It would allow feeds on phones as well as standard Web delivery.  Reasons resonate in Erick&#8217;s points above, to include reporting from the grassroots (uploading video clips, etc.) whereapon anything could be brought in.  Local candidate interviews live by locals for RS endorsement, support, etc.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>I dig the idea of a slightly more personalized diary where we could display our own Top-5 blogroll, etc.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Can I get a simple print friendly feature with the option of with/without comments?  There are times I just want to print and share with co-workers, friends, ya&#8217; know, put &#8216;education&#8217; in their own hands for follow-up and follow-through.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Establishing a &#8216;50 targets&#8217; in &#8216;50 states&#8217; congressional list.  Heck, make it votable, whereas the conservative/libertarian grassroots could highlight weaknesses in blue dog Dem&#8217;s and other districts.  A sort of grassroots bottom-up review vice RNC-driven model.  Both could unofficially meet in the middle (*see CPAC conference recommendation).</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>What would be the plausability of a RedState sponsored Right Root&#8217;s convention???</p>
</li>
</ol>
<p><img src="http://larrytemple.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/declaration_of_independence_by_john_trumbull.jpg?w=449&amp;h=294" alt="Founding Fathers" title="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbecker908</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2008/11/26/rs-2009-where-should-we-go/#comment-2822</link>
		<dc:creator>mbecker908</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2822</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Make that a damned fool.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make that a damned fool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pippin</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2008/11/26/rs-2009-where-should-we-go/#comment-2821</link>
		<dc:creator>Pippin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Nov 2008 00:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2821</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If the Democrats had 70 senate seats?  That seems to be what you're saying.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Democrats had 70 senate seats?  That seems to be what you&#8217;re saying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olsmithie</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2008/11/26/rs-2009-where-should-we-go/#comment-2820</link>
		<dc:creator>olsmithie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 23:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2820</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Literally.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Literally.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbecker908</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2008/11/26/rs-2009-where-should-we-go/#comment-2819</link>
		<dc:creator>mbecker908</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2819</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;even more than it applied to him.  "The only way I could lose this election is if I'm caught in bed with a live boy or a dead girl."  They are virtually unbeatable, as are House Members.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>even more than it applied to him.  &#8220;The only way I could lose this election is if I&#8217;m caught in bed with a live boy or a dead girl.&#8221;  They are virtually unbeatable, as are House Members.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbecker908</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2008/11/26/rs-2009-where-should-we-go/#comment-2818</link>
		<dc:creator>mbecker908</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2818</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;When the Republicans held 55 seats in the Senate and Specter was Chair of the Judiciary just why the hell do you think judicial nominees either couldn't get hearings or got hearings with no votes and couldn't get forwarded to the Senate floor (where they would have won acceptance by a wide margin)?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Maybe because the jerkoff who was Committee Chair didn't give a damn about seeing qualified conservative nominees get to the bench.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The pinheads you're so proud of pretty well kept any progress from being made in terms of focusing on smaller government or getting conservatives into critical positions.  See the UN Ambassador's job for starters.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the Republicans held 55 seats in the Senate and Specter was Chair of the Judiciary just why the hell do you think judicial nominees either couldn&#8217;t get hearings or got hearings with no votes and couldn&#8217;t get forwarded to the Senate floor (where they would have won acceptance by a wide margin)?</p>
<p>Maybe because the jerkoff who was Committee Chair didn&#8217;t give a damn about seeing qualified conservative nominees get to the bench.</p>
<p>The pinheads you&#8217;re so proud of pretty well kept any progress from being made in terms of focusing on smaller government or getting conservatives into critical positions.  See the UN Ambassador&#8217;s job for starters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pippin</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2008/11/26/rs-2009-where-should-we-go/#comment-2817</link>
		<dc:creator>Pippin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2817</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Then the Democrats would have 70 seats in the Senate.  That sounds like fun to you, huh?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then the Democrats would have 70 seats in the Senate.  That sounds like fun to you, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pippin</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2008/11/26/rs-2009-where-should-we-go/#comment-2816</link>
		<dc:creator>Pippin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2816</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;My feelings aren't hurt because the rule doesn't apply to me.  It doesn't affect me in the slightest if pro-choice people can't post on the front page, except that if that attitude prevails among Republicans, it will just mean bigger Democratic majorities in the House and Senate.  Apparently, that's not something you're interested in preventing.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I know the argument.  "If we only stayed true to principle we could win these elections."  That argument only works if the moderates and centrists respect your convictions even if they disagree with you.  That was McCain's failing, he didn't realize that voters will accept ideological disagreements if they think you are trustworthy, honest, and down-to-earth.  That's how Obama got such a large percent of the pro-life and anti-tax vote.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;HOWEVER, this strategy doesn't work if you tell the moderates and centrists to go f&lt;em&gt;*&lt;/em&gt; themselves.  THAT's what's worrying me.  The most important concept that gets people to go out and vote is a sense of ownership of the outcome, make them feel that they have a personal stake in it.  That's what depressed conservative turnout in states like Ohio this time around, McCain couldn't do that.  It's important to stay principled, but it's also important to make moderates feel like they've got a stake in the party.  Saying that we don't need them is not a good way to do that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My feelings aren&#8217;t hurt because the rule doesn&#8217;t apply to me.  It doesn&#8217;t affect me in the slightest if pro-choice people can&#8217;t post on the front page, except that if that attitude prevails among Republicans, it will just mean bigger Democratic majorities in the House and Senate.  Apparently, that&#8217;s not something you&#8217;re interested in preventing.</p>
<p>I know the argument.  &#8220;If we only stayed true to principle we could win these elections.&#8221;  That argument only works if the moderates and centrists respect your convictions even if they disagree with you.  That was McCain&#8217;s failing, he didn&#8217;t realize that voters will accept ideological disagreements if they think you are trustworthy, honest, and down-to-earth.  That&#8217;s how Obama got such a large percent of the pro-life and anti-tax vote.</p>
<p>HOWEVER, this strategy doesn&#8217;t work if you tell the moderates and centrists to go f<em>*</em> themselves.  THAT&#8217;s what&#8217;s worrying me.  The most important concept that gets people to go out and vote is a sense of ownership of the outcome, make them feel that they have a personal stake in it.  That&#8217;s what depressed conservative turnout in states like Ohio this time around, McCain couldn&#8217;t do that.  It&#8217;s important to stay principled, but it&#8217;s also important to make moderates feel like they&#8217;ve got a stake in the party.  Saying that we don&#8217;t need them is not a good way to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olsmithie</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2008/11/26/rs-2009-where-should-we-go/#comment-2815</link>
		<dc:creator>olsmithie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:49:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2815</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Lindsey Graham is a puzzle I have yet to figure out. How SC could have DeMint on one hand and Lindsey Grahmnesty on the other defies my comprehension. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Perhaps greater minds could explain it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lindsey Graham is a puzzle I have yet to figure out. How SC could have DeMint on one hand and Lindsey Grahmnesty on the other defies my comprehension. </p>
<p>Perhaps greater minds could explain it.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olsmithie</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2008/11/26/rs-2009-where-should-we-go/#comment-2814</link>
		<dc:creator>olsmithie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:43:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2814</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I believe that the largest percentage of them are. In views if not party.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Not necessarily the wild eyed,rabid Pelosi type Demoncrat, but more the '90s liberal Demoncrat.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If only they had the courage to admit it and change parties.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe that the largest percentage of them are. In views if not party.</p>
<p>Not necessarily the wild eyed,rabid Pelosi type Demoncrat, but more the &#8217;90s liberal Demoncrat.</p>
<p>If only they had the courage to admit it and change parties.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbecker908</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2008/11/26/rs-2009-where-should-we-go/#comment-2813</link>
		<dc:creator>mbecker908</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2813</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You've engaged a discussion on the future of the party and you've not said one thing related to policy or issues.  The only thing you've done is blather and whine about getting your feelings hurt.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Just go away.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve engaged a discussion on the future of the party and you&#8217;ve not said one thing related to policy or issues.  The only thing you&#8217;ve done is blather and whine about getting your feelings hurt.</p>
<p>Just go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olsmithie</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2008/11/26/rs-2009-where-should-we-go/#comment-2812</link>
		<dc:creator>olsmithie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2812</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;5&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>5</strong></p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olsmithie</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2008/11/26/rs-2009-where-should-we-go/#comment-2811</link>
		<dc:creator>olsmithie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 21:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2811</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Sounds like a dream election.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Lack of a firm stand on many issues by those two, and others has cost us the Congress and now the White House.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I ran into a lot of people that disagreed with Reagan very strongly, but they respected him because you never had to guess where he stood.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regarding "moderates" such as Specter, every time I turn around it seems someone is bringing up the "big tent" again. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It should be obvious to everyone by now that the " big tent" "folded."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Why pursue a losing strategy over and over?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a dream election.</p>
<p>Lack of a firm stand on many issues by those two, and others has cost us the Congress and now the White House.</p>
<p>I ran into a lot of people that disagreed with Reagan very strongly, but they respected him because you never had to guess where he stood.</p>
<p>Regarding &#8220;moderates&#8221; such as Specter, every time I turn around it seems someone is bringing up the &#8220;big tent&#8221; again. </p>
<p>It should be obvious to everyone by now that the &#8221; big tent&#8221; &#8220;folded.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why pursue a losing strategy over and over?</p>
<p>Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffreywturner</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2008/11/26/rs-2009-where-should-we-go/#comment-2810</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffreywturner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2810</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;But it seems they are smarter about it.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;They accept moderate/conservative Dems when they have to. IE: Ben Nelson from Nebraska.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In that same vane, I would be fine with Lindsey Graham if he was the GOP senator from Maine or New Jersey, but there is no excuse for a state like South Carolina to be represented by a moderate. We should only accept moderate/liberal GOPers if they represent states/disctricts where they are the best we could hope for. For instance, if Pataki or Giuliani run for Senate to replace Hillary in 2010, I would be happy to get a GOP seat from New York, even if they aren't pro-life, pro-gun, etc.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But it seems they are smarter about it.</p>
<p>They accept moderate/conservative Dems when they have to. IE: Ben Nelson from Nebraska.</p>
<p>In that same vane, I would be fine with Lindsey Graham if he was the GOP senator from Maine or New Jersey, but there is no excuse for a state like South Carolina to be represented by a moderate. We should only accept moderate/liberal GOPers if they represent states/disctricts where they are the best we could hope for. For instance, if Pataki or Giuliani run for Senate to replace Hillary in 2010, I would be happy to get a GOP seat from New York, even if they aren&#8217;t pro-life, pro-gun, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bs</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2008/11/26/rs-2009-where-should-we-go/#comment-2809</link>
		<dc:creator>bs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2809</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;or is it just accidental?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;McCain &lt;u&gt;was&lt;/u&gt; the candidate.  He lost.  We obviously had the "McCain wing of the party" front-and-center in 2008.  And it obviously didn't help.  Try reading the many, many postmortems (including several here) that make it clear that "better Left than the Left" doesn't work.  Do a little research before spouting off here.  This has been covered ad nauseum over the last three+ weeks here and in many other GOP/conservative circles.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There are certain values that are beyond compromise.  Pro-life is one of them.  We don't buckle on what is right just to buy votes.  If that's what you'd like to do, then go right ahead and promote it - you can do it here, even.  But you won't be doing it from the RedState front page.  And that is fine by the vast majority of those here.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>or is it just accidental?</p>
<p>McCain <u>was</u> the candidate.  He lost.  We obviously had the &#8220;McCain wing of the party&#8221; front-and-center in 2008.  And it obviously didn&#8217;t help.  Try reading the many, many postmortems (including several here) that make it clear that &#8220;better Left than the Left&#8221; doesn&#8217;t work.  Do a little research before spouting off here.  This has been covered ad nauseum over the last three+ weeks here and in many other GOP/conservative circles.</p>
<p>There are certain values that are beyond compromise.  Pro-life is one of them.  We don&#8217;t buckle on what is right just to buy votes.  If that&#8217;s what you&#8217;d like to do, then go right ahead and promote it - you can do it here, even.  But you won&#8217;t be doing it from the RedState front page.  And that is fine by the vast majority of those here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jeffreywturner</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2008/11/26/rs-2009-where-should-we-go/#comment-2808</link>
		<dc:creator>jeffreywturner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:18:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2808</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You MUST know that those appointments were accidents, don't you? I mean, you don't think Reagan KNEW O'Conner &#38; Kennedy would support Roe, do you?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You MUST know that those appointments were accidents, don&#8217;t you? I mean, you don&#8217;t think Reagan KNEW O&#8217;Conner &amp; Kennedy would support Roe, do you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveLA</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2008/11/26/rs-2009-where-should-we-go/#comment-2807</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveLA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2807</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Pippin&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Chill...the hardest of the hard core right that you encounter here on RS and are sparing with do not represent where the party stands on any range of issues, right now or in the future.  Matter of fact, the party is turning inward right now not Left and not Right, and will only do more of the same after "The One" is inaugurated. How that is going to turn out beats the heck out of me. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you want to beleive and spar with the hardest of the hard core posters here on RS and think that they represent mainstream thinking in the Republican brand, knock yourself out, but you'd be wrong and it's a waste of time. Try instead finding things that you agree with the hard right on, instead of spending so much time finding things you disagree on. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Psst...here's a small secret, even the hardest of the hard core far right folks here know the Republican brand is not turning their way, and I think that bugs them almost as much as "The One" is going to over the next four years. Hard Right politicians don't get elected outside of a very few places right now, simple fact, but competent politicians who actually mean what they say and do what they say are getting elected, not ideologues of ether party. Breathe deeply and consider that fact. You'll be a much happier camper.  &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pippin</p>
<p>Chill&#8230;the hardest of the hard core right that you encounter here on RS and are sparing with do not represent where the party stands on any range of issues, right now or in the future.  Matter of fact, the party is turning inward right now not Left and not Right, and will only do more of the same after &#8220;The One&#8221; is inaugurated. How that is going to turn out beats the heck out of me. </p>
<p>If you want to beleive and spar with the hardest of the hard core posters here on RS and think that they represent mainstream thinking in the Republican brand, knock yourself out, but you&#8217;d be wrong and it&#8217;s a waste of time. Try instead finding things that you agree with the hard right on, instead of spending so much time finding things you disagree on. </p>
<p>Psst&#8230;here&#8217;s a small secret, even the hardest of the hard core far right folks here know the Republican brand is not turning their way, and I think that bugs them almost as much as &#8220;The One&#8221; is going to over the next four years. Hard Right politicians don&#8217;t get elected outside of a very few places right now, simple fact, but competent politicians who actually mean what they say and do what they say are getting elected, not ideologues of ether party. Breathe deeply and consider that fact. You&#8217;ll be a much happier camper.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pippin</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2008/11/26/rs-2009-where-should-we-go/#comment-2806</link>
		<dc:creator>Pippin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2806</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;That's real substantive debate right there.  I can tell you care about the future of the party.  Are you five?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s real substantive debate right there.  I can tell you care about the future of the party.  Are you five?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbecker908</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2008/11/26/rs-2009-where-should-we-go/#comment-2805</link>
		<dc:creator>mbecker908</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2805</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/HPM/BM70~Whatever-You-Moron-Posters.jpg" alt="hb" title="" /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/pic/HPM/BM70~Whatever-You-Moron-Posters.jpg" alt="hb" title="" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbecker908</title>
		<link>http://www.redstate.com/erick/2008/11/26/rs-2009-where-should-we-go/#comment-2804</link>
		<dc:creator>mbecker908</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Nov 2008 20:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2804</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Of course, it's worth noting that the reason we're in the mess we're in is because nobody bothered to address any of these issues - like "what does the Party stand for?" - for the last dozen or so years.  It's been Moderate Heaven.  And, please note, it's been the moderate wing of the party that has steered us, full speed ahead, into oblivion and irrelevancy.  O&#38;I is the family home for moderates.  See Bob Michael's career.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If the process gets moving and Republicans actually decide to stand for something other than bipartisanship, we'll start winning.  Until then, enjoy the wilderness.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, it&#8217;s worth noting that the reason we&#8217;re in the mess we&#8217;re in is because nobody bothered to address any of these issues - like &#8220;what does the Party stand for?&#8221; - for the last dozen or so years.  It&#8217;s been Moderate Heaven.  And, please note, it&#8217;s been the moderate wing of the party that has steered us, full speed ahead, into oblivion and irrelevancy.  O&amp;I is the family home for moderates.  See Bob Michael&#8217;s career.</p>
<p>If the process gets moving and Republicans actually decide to stand for something other than bipartisanship, we&#8217;ll start winning.  Until then, enjoy the wilderness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
