Barack Obama’s Dangerous Game Will See Many of Us Killed


“The Jack Bauers if you will … see a President right now who made tough decisions in secret and stood by those decisions when they became public….These same men see the incoming President unwilling to stand behind one of their own.”

The media, let’s face it, want Barack Obama to succeed. They’ll want him to succeed until the moment Americans start getting slaughtered again in American streets by terrorists. And then they’ll want him to succeed even more.

But we must be prepared to set the record straight.

I am deeply concerned that Leon Panetta, a man with no prior intelligence experience, is Obama’s pick for CIA. Obama was scared to make a legitimate pick because the anti-American left opposed John O. Brennan.

And it is crucial to understand this point. Whatever else the CIA may be, it’s not simple. And because the American people entrusted the presidency to someone who needs to learn on the job, we cannot afford for critical advisers to also be learning on the job.

General Michael Hayden and John O. Brennan are career guys. They are not partisans. I could not tell you if either one was a Republican or Democrat or even if they voted.

They are professionals. But because they are connected to the Bush administration and the War on Terror, Obama is throwing them out.

These are the men who have kept us safe and alive for eight years. It was not Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld forcing policy positions on the intelligence community. It was the intelligence community making recommendations that were embraced by Cheney, Rumsfeld, and ultimately the President.

Make no mistake. Leon Panetta is a good man. But the CIA is not the OMB. Lives are at stake, not dollars. It is going to be very difficult for Leon Panetta to get up to speed on the way the CIA works. Leon Panetta is a political guy, not an intelligence guy.

That Obama is sweeping out career intelligence officers is a clear sign he intends to clear out the policies these intelligence officers advocated and implemented — the very same policies that kept us safe for eight years.

But there is an additional, very serious issue at stake here.

The low level guys, the Jack Bauers if you will, are seeing all of this. They see a President right now who made tough decisions in secret and stood by those decisions when they became public, even though those decisions were hugely unpopular. The low level guys intrinsically knew they could kill bad men in undisclosed locations and be supported if the lights came on.

These same men see the incoming President unwilling to stand behind one of their own — a career CIA officer in John O. Brennan. It is an unspoken message to all of them that should they take the bold action needed to keep freedom secure, they may not be backed up by President Obama should the actions come to light.

They will therefore return to their state of being prior to 9/11. And darkness will again start creeping from the shadows.

Barack Obama is playing a dangerous game; a game that will probably see many of us killed. And we should not be shy about saying so.

Category: , , , ,

RSS feed

21 Comments Leave a comment

What you describe at CIA, Erick

Achance Thursday, January 8th at 9:12AM EST (link)

will happen at every agency of the government. Every interest group that supported BHO will have a hit list that goes way down into the merit system employees, not just the appointee level. The unions will purge USDOL. La Raza will purge ICE. CAIR will purge DHS. The ACLU, civil rights groups, and other interests will purge USDOJ, right down into the law enforcement ranks - they may not fire FBI agents, but they’ll sure decide who gets an office with no windows and a seat that flushes. Regional administrators, auditors, and other oversight staff in various agencies will either be removed or find a laser dot on their forehead.

Competence is in short supply in the federal government under the best of circumstances, but that is compounded by the fact that even though we’re supposed to have “civil service” employees, your job is forfeit every four years - even if you’re only a worker bee. Unlike Republicans who are generally afraid to even fire political appointees who engage in outright sedition or treason, Democrats will fire public employees for the crime of actually doing their job.

USDOL and USDOJ have quietly gone after lots of unions over the last eight years, not nearly as much as they should have, but enough for the unions to have really felt the pressure. I will guarantee you that everybody in a management/supervisory role in that will either be fired or not have an office or a phone by March. The employees below that level will either be harrassed out of their jobs or harrased into fetal position for the next four or eight years. That story will be repeated for auditors who went after HSS corruption in Blue states or misspent DOE funds in big city school districts, or non-union contractors on federally funded jobs, and on, and on.

The other side of it is that the efforts of those employees will be “redirected.” Their investigations of anything or anyone that has an “in” with the Administration will be ended. Court cases will be settled or dropped. Administrative appeals will be dropped. Regulatory processess will completely change direction. How long do you think it will take BHO’s Department of the Interior to put the Polar Bear and the Walrus on the Endangered Species list? There goes any further oil development off Alaska’s coasts and potentially ALL future development of ANY industry that produces carbon.

I’ve been on the receiving end of a Democrat transition team. It’s not really a big deal if you’re a political appointee. You expect to get fired if your candidate loses, and if you didn’t, you shouldn’t have taken the appointment. But Democrats go right down to the clerks, and especially they go after husbands, wives, and SOs of the prior administration’s appointees. Under the best of circumstances, government work is a “closed shop.” If it is known that the Administration is after you or has forced you out of a job, you are simply unemployable elsewhere in government; no manager is going to take the risk of having that red dot on his forehead because he gave you a job, or your wife a job, or your kid a job, or anybody who’ll admit to being your friend a job. The new appointees will be going through their employee rolls and comparing them to political contributor lists. If your name is on the wrong list, welcome to employment Hell.

It is easy for Democrats. Republicans don’t fire many people and certainly don’t take the risk of going down into the merit system. High level Democrats that get fired by a Republican adminstration just segue over to one of the non-profits that shadow every federal agency, to a law firm, a union, or some interest group. There’s very little of that for Republicans fired by a Democrat Administration, so you’re in the wilderness and essentially unemployable if your specialty is one of those things done only by government.

I’ll guarantee you there’s a lot of fear and trepidation in the ranks of federal employees these days. And we’ll never hear a word of any of it. Since it is Democrats doing it, the media won’t care or may even applaud what’s going on.

In Vino Veritas

Yep

10ksnooker Thursday, January 8th at 10:22AM EST (link)

And the Commies will never be rooted out afterwards.

When there is even the will, it takes forever.

Achance Thursday, January 8th at 10:43AM EST (link)

This is one of the reasons government workforces tend Democrat. It is safer to be a Democrat and to be uncooperative with Republican Administrations, or at minimum, to not be very enthusiastic about carrying out Republican initiatives - or any iniative that powerful Democrat interests oppose. Every Democrat interest group in the Country has handed BHO’s transition teams a hit list of the federal employees who have given them trouble, auditors, inspectors, investigators, administrators, contract and grant officers. At minimum, when the new boss shows up he or she is going to call those people in and tell them all about the powerful interests that want them fired and how doing his bidding is the only thing between them and unemployment. Since the unions will have supported the Democrat, they aren’t going to help an employee that is crossthreaded with a Democrat Administration, at least not that kind of crossthreaded. The Merit System processes won’t protect the employee because they are run by appointees that will side with the Administration. So, an employee fired under these circumstances can only sue using his own money. In capital cities it is hard to even get a lawyer to represent you against the government, because they don’t want to get crossthreaded with the Administration either.

Frankly, the safest thing a government employee can do is make a career of doing as little as possible, attracting as little attention as possible, and living long enough to collect the retirement check. The reason for that fact is Democrats, not Republicans.

In Vino Veritas

 
 
 

This demonstrates what all of us knew all along

bs Thursday, January 8th at 9:44AM EST (link)

Obama is an incompetent boob who has no experience. He is a politician who knows how to get elected and how to reward his buddies - a lesson learned well in the cesspool of Chicago politics.

As you imply, America may soon learn the sad lesson of electing nothing more than a slogan.

Decorum is fo’ suckas

 

Obviously we disagree over this

Streiff Thursday, January 8th at 10:11AM EST (link)

to reiterate my postion

1. The senior career people at CIA are hostile to the War on Terror. They have demonstrated that consistently via their leaks, books, etc. If you want the War on Terror to continue to be prosecuted as anything other than a law enforcement action, choosing a DCI who came up through the agency is not the way to go.

2. GHW Bush’s first intelligence job was as DCI. When selected he was head of the RNC. I’m not saying Panetta is GHW Bush but I am saying that GHW Bush was better than Stansfield Turner (military intelligence background) or George Tenet (homegrown CIA). As I pointed out yesterday, when you look at the accomplishments/failures of the CIA they are totally unrelated to the DCI’s background.

To the meat of the matter. If something bad does happen, who would you rather be in charge of the CIA? A career professional who will be tossed under the bus or a politically connected insider who will at least provide some amusement while thumping around the rear duals? (I use the worst case example not because I am hoping for an attack but only because I assume Obama will take credit for any and all successes regardless of who is in charge.)

For the record, I don’t think the CIA has kept us safe and I don’t think they are capable of keeping us safe. Given their reduced role under the current DNI framework, the head of CIA is a lot less relevant than who is the DNI.

I think what has kept us safe is the extraordinary covert capability developed by USSOCOM, the fact that we are stationing military covert action teams in assorted countries, and our large scale and active presence in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa which had deprived transnational terror organizations of funds and safe havens for training camps and planning.

“A man does what he can and endures what he must.”

The, Streiff, what is your estimate on whether or not

janis Thursday, January 8th at 10:17AM EST (link)

those same actions that have kept us safe will be allowed to continue? Given that Robert Gates is still SecDef, can we count on anything approaching the same level of pro-active protection that we have seen over the past 8 years?

pretty low

Streiff Thursday, January 8th at 10:21AM EST (link)

having said that, I’m certainly not convinced that an Obama CIA is going to step in to fill the gap regardless of who is in charge because their whole culture is risk averse.

If Obama wanted them to fill the gap, Panetta would be a better choice than someone from inside the agency who would be against the notion from the outset.

“A man does what he can and endures what he must.”

Thanks for the answer and I'm sorry I asked. Is there not

janis Thursday, January 8th at 10:25AM EST (link)

SOME calculation on the part of those who will be in charge that, if we get hit during the O administration and it can be shown that safeguards were deliberately dismantled that led to the attack(s), then O gets the blame? If they want to succeed and go two terms, don’t they by definition HAVE to keep us safe?

I'd say you're dealing with basic game theory here

Streiff Thursday, January 8th at 10:37AM EST (link)

To do something active entails risk that something bad will happen. When you look at the clown car that rolled up to kidnap the muslim cleric off a Milan street you have to acknowledge that risk goes us exponentially with the frequency with which you carry it out.

You could also look at the progress we’ve made in military operations and conclude that it will be a long time before al Qaeda could organize anything significant against us, though they could do so against various European countries at any time. That, however, is not your issue if you are the US president.

So if you want to minimize the risk of bad things for your two terms I think you can safely reduce covert actions.

The real impact of that will come a decade or so from now when they’ve had a chance to reconstitute and reorganize. Just remember, it took about 20 years for them to get around to taking a shot at us on 9/11, they can wait.

“A man does what he can and endures what he must.”

What about the build up of Hezbollah assets in South America?

janis Thursday, January 8th at 10:42AM EST (link)

They weren’t there 10 years ago. With the cozy relationships that Russia, Iran and China are building with Chavez, doesn’t it seem more likely that we will be looking at attacks from some quarter other than just al Qaeda?

 

Let's just say

Erick Erickson Thursday, January 8th at 10:49AM EST (link)

I used to agree with you, but very recently changed my mind.

image

Who will stand on either hand and keep this bridge with me?

 
 
 
 
 

I read your piece Streiff

Jack_Savage Thursday, January 8th at 10:48AM EST (link)

And here is where I agree with you - things being as they are these days, intel experience seems secondary to political experience. Dems have made intel political, now and forever more. In Obama’s opinion, CIA needs a savvy advocate and it needs to become more loyal to the President (don’t think Obama didn’t notice the leaks). They may have that handled in Panetta.

But I keep coming back to this point - picking Panetta is pure capitulation. It is capitulation to the left and it is capitulation to the terrorists, and it is a signal that CIA has become a primarily a political organization. Sure, the upper levels of the CIA are against doing their jobs, but those above them and many below them know that what they have been doing for the past seven years is right, and this has kept the loudmouths in the shadows.

This appointment sends a clear signal to everyone that CIA and the war on terror are now secondary. I am surprised that CIA director is still a cabinet position in the Obama administration.

 

Someone needed to quash culture of betrayal against the President

LJ "Beaglescout" Miller Thursday, January 8th at 10:50AM EST (link)

Panetta may be able to do something good at the CIA after all. As a fierce partisan loyal to the President rather than the CIA he will brook no betrayal of the President in the CIA. These are the same traitors who leaked and burned Bush, their own President and boss, repeatedly, who Bush never called out or prosecuted for their actions. Bush’s inaction was inexcusable. If he had aggressively prosecuted the leaks about secret prisons the much more important and damaging SWIFT and FISA leaks never would have happened, the whole Plame/Wilson fiasco of lies would have been defended much more aggressively, and Scooter Libby might not have been caught in a perjury trap. Obviously the CIA leakers cannot be trusted by any President, and Panetta’s first job is going to be to hamstring and drive them out of the CIA.

“Each of us has a natural right, from God, to defend his person, his liberty, and his property.”

–Frederic Bastiat

They can be trusted by a Democrat President.

Achance Thursday, January 8th at 10:59AM EST (link)

All Republicans at the appointee level will be fired as soon as BHO’s hand comes off the Bible. All supervisors and managers promoted by Republicans will have a laser dot on their forehead. Some will be fired, even if they’re career employees- Democrats can get away with it, some will be reassigned, and some will be given a chair in a closet and no phone. And after all that, if anybody dares do anything considered not in the Administration’s interest, justice will be swift and certain.

Republicans need to watch and learn from the next three months as Democrats move to undo everything the Republicans have done in living memory. The lesson may not do any good because unless the Rs step up quickly, it may be a generation before there is any hope of being in power again.

In Vino Veritas

 
 

Yes.

Jeff Emanuel Thursday, January 8th at 1:05PM EST (link)

I think what has kept us safe is the extraordinary covert capability developed by USSOCOM, the fact that we are stationing military covert action teams in assorted countries, and our large scale and active presence in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the Horn of Africa which had deprived transnational terror organizations of funds and safe havens for training camps and planning.

This USSOCOM veteran couldn’t agree more.

JE

 
 

Eric, I could not disagree with you more

kyle8 Thursday, January 8th at 10:14AM EST (link)

I am happy to have an inconsequential nobody like Panetta in charge of the CIA, I would be even happier if the congress dissolved the CIA.

The CIA is a do-nothing, asinine, ideological left, career bureaucrat dumping ground. They were wrong about nearly everything during the cold war, and have gotten nothing right about jihad.(when they were not actively conspiring with the state department to undermine the president.

I refer you to a good book by John Diamond. The CIA and the Culture of Failure

“Nothing works like freedom, Nothing succeeds like liberty”
Kyle

 

Because the MSM does their job poorly

Illinicon Thursday, January 8th at 10:52AM EST (link)

How much of the CIA chief’s job is being top spy and how much of it is being buraeucrat? I think that is the key question here, if its a bureaucratic job than Panetta is a ok, but underwhelming, pick as he can do that and that agency isnt working that way it should (run up to 9/11 and Iraq War. If it is more of a hands on intelliegence job than he should not be it. I still do not why he did not choose Jane Harmon, she someone who has been critical of Bush adminastration policy, but I think everyone would agree she is a grown up on intellegence issues unlike Panetta.

Jindal/Thompson ‘12

Bringing clear Conservative change to America.

 

When will the Democrats start acting like grownups?

Vladimir Thursday, January 8th at 10:54AM EST (link)

OK, it’s a rhetorical question.

But still, they just seem to be organically unable to get over BDS and their hatred of everything Republican. Collectively, we do have enemies who are capable of inflicting greater damage to the country than Halliburton, Blackwater and Dick Cheney combined.

Their model of behavior relative to the country seems to mimic the relationship between parasitic unions (UAW or SEIU) and their employers. In their single minded power-grabs, they are blissfully unaware that what they’re doing is strangling the host.

There is no opinion, however absurd, which men will not readily embrace as soon as they can be brought to the conviction that it is generally adopted. - Arthur Schopenhauer

 

Erick you are spot on...

tsquare Thursday, January 8th at 10:56AM EST (link)

if not directly about Panetta then about the whole world view of the BHO Administration.

Defenses will come down… be relaxed and there will be another attack… ‘the world’ knows he’s weak, and will want to get him to get out… of everything.

And when it does the carnage it will make 9/11 pale in comparison.

Elections have consequences BHO is who ‘the people’ wanted. Now they will get him.

 

The proxy action is happening now.

kchand Thursday, January 8th at 11:22AM EST (link)

Just watch how Israel/Gaza(Hamas) pans out over the coming months. How BO and his administration acts (and reacts) will tell you everything you need to know. My guess is that Israel will, ultimately, end up weaker unless Hamas is destroyed. Watch how the international community responds to that action AND to BO’s actions.

If Israel is not objectively victorious, the green light is on for Iran and all its proxies. You don’t annoy the termites that are destroying your house, you eliminate them. And, the terminates aren’t destroying your house because of an ideology.

Hopefully, oil prices will stay very low to provide less funding and help increase the unrest in the oil-rich middle east countries. That would help much more than the BO administration will.

——————–
Vista really sucks!

 

I would prefer we dangle them from the trees of DC

JLenardDetroit Thursday, January 8th at 11:13PM EST (link)

This bunch of Political hacks that will be putting forth their Surrender First Doctrine designed to advance/protect the Democrat Party from losing support of its Leftist loonies should be hanged from the nearest Washington DC trees as the Traitors to the Country they are (by putting Country LAST) once it occurs!

Next time I won’t sugar-coat it!

(RS:Help) (JLD) (Hollyweird) (Brain-deads) (SPIN-cycle) (Obamaocare) (Party of kNOw) (Conservatism) (TEApeats) (respectful) (Reco) (Quotes) (removeRINOs.com) (Merry RSmas)
+ 0bama Lies & your Bank acct will Die! (4/15 Truthers)
+ Heil “O” Hell No Obamao is NOT MY PRESIDENT! “No U won’t”
+ I want “O” to FAIL (here, here, & whole Diary (Ofail) here, is why)
The first Liberal was Satan” - a Rush caller (other Quotes)

 

Leave a Comment

 

Be respectful, or be banned. No Profanity.